From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Anholt Subject: Re: [PATCH] Encorage dead-code elimination for unused interpolation channels Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 11:21:57 +0800 Message-ID: <87k4kb9uzu.fsf@pollan.anholt.net> References: <1289967925.30171.1.camel@pcjc2lap> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1863292175==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1289967925.30171.1.camel@pcjc2lap> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Peter Clifton , Intel List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org --===============1863292175== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" --=-=-= On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 04:25:25 +0000, Peter Clifton wrote: > After some discussion with Eric on IRC, this is what I came up with > (which appears to work!) The other way (fix up dead code eliminator) ended up deleting the same gen code while also deleting C code. As I thought about it, since at some point we may want to handle, say, key.linear_color, I think it'll be easier to not split interpolation into two separate regs. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkzkm9UACgkQHUdvYGzw6veDCQCeKZX69dZPmXDjhH7C23heX/vV l2QAn0ACDta+DzXOLsrxKtDOUq8UeJFV =83yB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- --===============1863292175== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx --===============1863292175==--