public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Consolidate binding parameters into flags
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 15:09:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lhy045ih.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1390862093-12195-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

On Tue, 28 Jan 2014, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> Anything more than just one bool parameter is just a pain to read,
> symbolic constants are much better.
>
> Split out from Chris' vma-binding rework patch.
>
> v2: Undo the behaviour change in object_pin that Chris spotted.
>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

[snip]

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> index 032def901f98..9399a6fa4c2f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> @@ -544,19 +544,23 @@ i915_gem_execbuffer_reserve_vma(struct i915_vma *vma,
>  	struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = vma->obj;
>  	struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 *entry = vma->exec_entry;
>  	bool has_fenced_gpu_access = INTEL_INFO(ring->dev)->gen < 4;
> -	bool need_fence, need_mappable;
> -	u32 flags = (entry->flags & EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_GTT) &&
> -		!vma->obj->has_global_gtt_mapping ? GLOBAL_BIND : 0;
> +	bool need_fence;
> +	unsigned flags;
>  	int ret;
>  
> +	flags = 0;
> +
>  	need_fence =
>  		has_fenced_gpu_access &&
>  		entry->flags & EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_FENCE &&
>  		obj->tiling_mode != I915_TILING_NONE;
> -	need_mappable = need_fence || need_reloc_mappable(vma);
> +	if (need_fence || need_reloc_mappable(vma))
> +		flags |= PIN_MAPPABLE;
> +
> +	if (entry->flags & EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_GTT)
> +		flags |= PIN_GLOBAL;

It is not obvious to me that this together with the PIN_GLOBAL handling
in i915_gem_object_pin() do not introduce a functional change. (Stress
on obvious to _me_; it may be obvious to you.)

I would have thought it better to first change the two bool parameters
to two flags, and then add the new flag in a separate patch to not
confuse poor reviewers like myself.

[snip]

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> index d897a19f887f..a0793c929b95 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> @@ -531,9 +531,11 @@ init_pipe_control(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring)
>  		goto err;
>  	}
>  
> -	i915_gem_object_set_cache_level(ring->scratch.obj, I915_CACHE_LLC);
> +	ret = i915_gem_object_set_cache_level(ring->scratch.obj, I915_CACHE_LLC);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto err_unref;

This should be split out from the patch just like patch 4/9.

BR,
Jani.


-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center

  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-28 13:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-27 18:10 Split-up of "drm/i915: Only bind each object rather than for every execbuffer" Daniel Vetter
2014-01-27 18:10 ` [PATCH 1/9] drm/i915: Consolidate binding parameters into flags Daniel Vetter
2014-01-27 21:47   ` Chris Wilson
2014-01-27 21:55     ` Daniel Vetter
2014-01-27 22:34   ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2014-01-28 13:09     ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2014-01-27 18:10 ` [PATCH 2/9] drm/i915: Don't set PIN_MAPPABLE for legacy ringbuffers Daniel Vetter
2014-01-27 18:10 ` [PATCH 3/9] drm/i915: Don't pin the status page as mappable Daniel Vetter
2014-01-27 18:10 ` [PATCH 4/9] drm/i915: Handle set_cache_level errors in the status page setup Daniel Vetter
2014-01-28 13:11   ` Jani Nikula
2014-01-27 18:10 ` [PATCH 5/9] drm/i915: Don't allocate context pages as mappable Daniel Vetter
2014-01-27 18:10 ` [PATCH 6/9] drm/i915: Allow blocking in the PDE alloc when running low on gtt space Daniel Vetter
2014-01-27 18:10 ` [PATCH 7/9] drm/i915: Simplify i915_gem_object_ggtt_unpin Daniel Vetter
2014-01-28 13:13   ` Jani Nikula
2014-01-28 14:21     ` Chris Wilson
2014-01-27 18:10 ` [PATCH 8/9] drm/i915: Directly return the vma from bind_to_vm Daniel Vetter
2014-01-28 13:21   ` Jani Nikula
2014-01-27 18:10 ` [PATCH 9/9] drm/i915: Only bind each object rather than for every execbuffer Daniel Vetter
2014-01-27 22:36   ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2014-01-28 13:29 ` Split-up of "drm/i915: Only bind each object rather than for every execbuffer" Jani Nikula

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87lhy045ih.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=benjamin.widawsky@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox