From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Calculate common rates and max lane count in Long pulse handler
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 23:25:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mvg7l9di.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1480651329-21578-1-git-send-email-manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
On Fri, 02 Dec 2016, Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com> wrote:
> Supported link rate common to source and sink as well as the
> maximum supported lane count based on source and sink capabilities should
> be set only once on hotplug and then used anytime they are requested.
> This patch creates and array of common rates and max lane count as the
> intel_dp member. It gets calculated only once in the long pulse handler
> and then gets used when requested in compute_config and other functions.
>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
> Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++----------------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 5 +++++
> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index 9dfbde4..de37807 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -274,8 +274,7 @@ static int intersect_rates(const int *source_rates, int source_len,
> return k;
> }
>
> -static int intel_dp_common_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> - int *common_rates)
> +static int intel_dp_common_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
This here is a bad interface change. After this, you can only use the
function to update intel_dp->common_rates. However, this doesn't finish
the job, and leaves it up to the caller to set intel_dp->common_len. The
sole remaining call site of intel_dp_common_rates() should set the alarm
bells ringing.
Please keep it as a helper, passing in common_rates. There's follow-up
work to be done on top, but we can leave that for later.
> {
> const int *source_rates, *sink_rates;
> int source_len, sink_len;
> @@ -285,7 +284,7 @@ static int intel_dp_common_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>
> return intersect_rates(source_rates, source_len,
> sink_rates, sink_len,
> - common_rates);
> + intel_dp->common_rates);
> }
>
> static enum drm_mode_status
> @@ -312,7 +311,7 @@ static int intel_dp_common_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> }
>
> max_link_clock = intel_dp_max_link_rate(intel_dp);
> - max_lanes = intel_dp_max_lane_count(intel_dp);
> + max_lanes = intel_dp->max_lane_count;
>
> max_rate = intel_dp_max_data_rate(max_link_clock, max_lanes);
> mode_rate = intel_dp_link_required(target_clock, 18);
> @@ -1430,8 +1429,7 @@ static void snprintf_int_array(char *str, size_t len,
> static void intel_dp_print_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> {
> const int *source_rates, *sink_rates;
> - int source_len, sink_len, common_len;
> - int common_rates[DP_MAX_SUPPORTED_RATES];
> + int source_len, sink_len;
> char str[128]; /* FIXME: too big for stack? */
>
> if ((drm_debug & DRM_UT_KMS) == 0)
> @@ -1445,8 +1443,8 @@ static void intel_dp_print_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> snprintf_int_array(str, sizeof(str), sink_rates, sink_len);
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("sink rates: %s\n", str);
>
> - common_len = intel_dp_common_rates(intel_dp, common_rates);
> - snprintf_int_array(str, sizeof(str), common_rates, common_len);
> + snprintf_int_array(str, sizeof(str), intel_dp->common_rates,
> + intel_dp->common_len);
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("common rates: %s\n", str);
> }
>
> @@ -1495,14 +1493,12 @@ static int rate_to_index(int find, const int *rates)
> int
> intel_dp_max_link_rate(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> {
> - int rates[DP_MAX_SUPPORTED_RATES] = {};
> - int len;
> + int len = intel_dp->common_len;
>
> - len = intel_dp_common_rates(intel_dp, rates);
> if (WARN_ON(len <= 0))
> return 162000;
>
> - return rates[len - 1];
> + return intel_dp->common_rates[len - 1];
> }
>
> int intel_dp_rate_select(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, int rate)
> @@ -1550,22 +1546,18 @@ static int intel_dp_compute_bpp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> struct intel_connector *intel_connector = intel_dp->attached_connector;
> int lane_count, clock;
> int min_lane_count = 1;
> - int max_lane_count = intel_dp_max_lane_count(intel_dp);
> + int max_lane_count = intel_dp->max_lane_count;
> /* Conveniently, the link BW constants become indices with a shift...*/
> int min_clock = 0;
> int max_clock;
> int bpp, mode_rate;
> int link_avail, link_clock;
> - int common_rates[DP_MAX_SUPPORTED_RATES] = {};
> - int common_len;
> uint8_t link_bw, rate_select;
>
> - common_len = intel_dp_common_rates(intel_dp, common_rates);
> -
> /* No common link rates between source and sink */
> - WARN_ON(common_len <= 0);
> + WARN_ON(intel_dp->common_len <= 0);
This would be better right after setting intel_dp->common_len.
>
> - max_clock = common_len - 1;
> + max_clock = intel_dp->common_len - 1;
>
> if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev_priv) && !HAS_DDI(dev_priv) && port != PORT_A)
> pipe_config->has_pch_encoder = true;
> @@ -1597,7 +1589,7 @@ static int intel_dp_compute_bpp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DP link computation with max lane count %i "
> "max bw %d pixel clock %iKHz\n",
> - max_lane_count, common_rates[max_clock],
> + max_lane_count, intel_dp->common_rates[max_clock],
> adjusted_mode->crtc_clock);
>
> /* Walk through all bpp values. Luckily they're all nicely spaced with 2
> @@ -1633,7 +1625,7 @@ static int intel_dp_compute_bpp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> lane_count <= max_lane_count;
> lane_count <<= 1) {
>
> - link_clock = common_rates[clock];
> + link_clock = intel_dp->common_rates[clock];
> link_avail = intel_dp_max_data_rate(link_clock,
> lane_count);
>
> @@ -1663,7 +1655,7 @@ static int intel_dp_compute_bpp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> pipe_config->lane_count = lane_count;
>
> pipe_config->pipe_bpp = bpp;
> - pipe_config->port_clock = common_rates[clock];
> + pipe_config->port_clock = intel_dp->common_rates[clock];
>
> intel_dp_compute_rate(intel_dp, pipe_config->port_clock,
> &link_bw, &rate_select);
> @@ -4400,7 +4392,9 @@ static bool intel_digital_port_connected(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> yesno(intel_dp_source_supports_hbr2(intel_dp)),
> yesno(drm_dp_tps3_supported(intel_dp->dpcd)));
>
> + intel_dp->common_len = intel_dp_common_rates(intel_dp);
See how this looks bad, as updating of the length and contents are
divided between caller and callee?
> intel_dp_print_rates(intel_dp);
> + intel_dp->max_lane_count = intel_dp_max_lane_count(intel_dp);
>
> intel_dp_read_desc(intel_dp);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> index 1d126c2..7c8885e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> @@ -906,6 +906,11 @@ struct intel_dp {
> /* sink rates as reported by DP_SUPPORTED_LINK_RATES */
> uint8_t num_sink_rates;
> int sink_rates[DP_MAX_SUPPORTED_RATES];
> + /* supported link rates common between source and sink */
> + int common_rates[DP_MAX_SUPPORTED_RATES];
> + int common_len;
> + /* Maximum supported lane count common between source and sink */
> + uint8_t max_lane_count;
> /* sink or branch descriptor */
> struct intel_dp_desc desc;
> struct drm_dp_aux aux;
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-07 21:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-02 4:02 [PATCH] drm/i915: Calculate common rates and max lane count in Long pulse handler Manasi Navare
2016-12-02 4:15 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for " Patchwork
2016-12-02 11:35 ` Saarinen, Jani
2016-12-02 17:39 ` [PATCH] " Manasi Navare
2016-12-07 21:25 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2016-12-07 21:44 ` Manasi Navare
2016-12-07 22:04 ` Jani Nikula
2016-12-07 23:10 ` Manasi Navare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87mvg7l9di.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=manasi.d.navare@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox