public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] drm/i915/bdw: Fix the write setting up the	WIZ hashing mode
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 11:42:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87oarbhmdm.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1418060031-4766-1-git-send-email-damien.lespiau@intel.com>

On Mon, 08 Dec 2014, Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> wrote:
> I was playing with clang and oh surprise! a warning trigerred by
> -Wshift-overflow (gcc doesn't have this one):
>
>     WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(GEN7_GT_MODE,
>                       GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_MASK | GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_16x4);
>
>     drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c:786:2: warning: signed shift result
>       (0x28002000000) requires 43 bits to represent, but 'int' only has 32 bits
>       [-Wshift-overflow]
>         WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(GEN7_GT_MODE,
>         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>     drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c:737:15: note: expanded from macro
>       'WA_SET_BIT_MASKED'
>         WA_REG(addr, _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(mask), (mask) & 0xffff)
>
> Turned out GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_MASK was already shifted by 16, and we were
> trying to shift it a bit more.
>
> The other thing is that it's not the usual case of setting WA bits here, we
> need to have separate mask and value.
>
> To fix this, I've introduced a new _MASKED_FIELD() macro that takes both the
> (unshifted) mask and the desired value and the rest of the patch ripples
> through from it.
>
> This bug was introduced when reworking the WA emission in:
>
>   Commit 7225342ab501befdb64bcec76ded41f5897c0855
>   Author: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
>   Date:   Tue Oct 7 17:21:26 2014 +0300
>
>       drm/i915: Build workaround list in ring initialization
>
> v2: Invert the order of the mask and value arguments (Daniel Vetter)
>     Rewrite _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE() and _MASKED_BIT_DISABLE() with
>     _MASKED_FIELD() (Jani Nikula)
>     Make sure we only evaluate 'a' once in _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE() (Dave Gordon)
>     Add check to ensure the value is within the mask boundaries (Chris Wilson)
>
> v3: Ensure the the value and mask are 16 bits (Dave Gordon)
>
> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Arun Siluvery <arun.siluvery@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>

Pushed to drm-intel-next-fixes, replacing the old version. Thanks for
the patch.

Now the question is, do we want [1] for 3.19 or 3.20?

BR,
Jani.


http://mid.gmane.org/1418060138-5004-1-git-send-email-damien.lespiau@intel.com


> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h         | 17 ++++++++++++++---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c         |  6 +++---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c |  8 ++++++--
>  3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index dc03fac..454a3a3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -34,8 +34,19 @@
>  #define _PORT3(port, a, b, c) ((port) == PORT_A ? (a) : \
>  			       (port) == PORT_B ? (b) : (c))
>  
> -#define _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(a) (((a) << 16) | (a))
> -#define _MASKED_BIT_DISABLE(a) ((a) << 16)
> +#define _MASKED_FIELD(mask, value) ({					   \
> +	if (__builtin_constant_p(mask))					   \
> +		BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(((mask) & 0xffff0000), "Incorrect mask"); \
> +	if (__builtin_constant_p(value))				   \
> +		BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG((value) & 0xffff0000, "Incorrect value"); \
> +	if (__builtin_constant_p(mask) && __builtin_constant_p(value))	   \
> +		BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG((value) & ~(mask),			   \
> +				 "Incorrect value for mask");		   \
> +	(mask) << 16 | (value); })
> +#define _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(a)	({ typeof(a) _a = (a); _MASKED_FIELD(_a, _a); })
> +#define _MASKED_BIT_DISABLE(a)	(_MASKED_FIELD((a), 0))
> +
> +
>  
>  /* PCI config space */
>  
> @@ -1284,7 +1295,7 @@ enum punit_power_well {
>  #define   GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_8x8				GEN6_WIZ_HASHING(0, 0)
>  #define   GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_8x4				GEN6_WIZ_HASHING(0, 1)
>  #define   GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_16x4				GEN6_WIZ_HASHING(1, 0)
> -#define   GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_MASK				(GEN6_WIZ_HASHING(1, 1) << 16)
> +#define   GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_MASK				GEN6_WIZ_HASHING(1, 1)
>  #define   GEN6_TD_FOUR_ROW_DISPATCH_DISABLE		(1 << 5)
>  
>  #define GFX_MODE	0x02520
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index 78911e2..0f2febd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -6389,7 +6389,7 @@ static void gen6_init_clock_gating(struct drm_device *dev)
>  	 * to keep in mind (see 3DSTATE_PS and 3DSTATE_WM).
>  	 */
>  	I915_WRITE(GEN6_GT_MODE,
> -		   GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_MASK | GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_16x4);
> +		   _MASKED_FIELD(GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_MASK, GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_16x4));
>  
>  	ilk_init_lp_watermarks(dev);
>  
> @@ -6587,7 +6587,7 @@ static void haswell_init_clock_gating(struct drm_device *dev)
>  	 * to keep in mind (see 3DSTATE_PS and 3DSTATE_WM).
>  	 */
>  	I915_WRITE(GEN7_GT_MODE,
> -		   GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_MASK | GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_16x4);
> +		   _MASKED_FIELD(GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_MASK, GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_16x4));
>  
>  	/* WaSwitchSolVfFArbitrationPriority:hsw */
>  	I915_WRITE(GAM_ECOCHK, I915_READ(GAM_ECOCHK) | HSW_ECOCHK_ARB_PRIO_SOL);
> @@ -6684,7 +6684,7 @@ static void ivybridge_init_clock_gating(struct drm_device *dev)
>  	 * to keep in mind (see 3DSTATE_PS and 3DSTATE_WM).
>  	 */
>  	I915_WRITE(GEN7_GT_MODE,
> -		   GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_MASK | GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_16x4);
> +		   _MASKED_FIELD(GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_MASK, GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_16x4));
>  
>  	snpcr = I915_READ(GEN6_MBCUNIT_SNPCR);
>  	snpcr &= ~GEN6_MBC_SNPCR_MASK;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> index 79b4ca5..9deb152 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> @@ -739,6 +739,9 @@ static int wa_add(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  #define WA_CLR_BIT_MASKED(addr, mask) \
>  	WA_REG(addr, _MASKED_BIT_DISABLE(mask), (mask) & 0xffff)
>  
> +#define WA_SET_FIELD_MASKED(addr, mask, value) \
> +	WA_REG(addr, _MASKED_FIELD(mask, value), mask)
> +
>  #define WA_SET_BIT(addr, mask) WA_REG(addr, I915_READ(addr) | (mask), mask)
>  #define WA_CLR_BIT(addr, mask) WA_REG(addr, I915_READ(addr) & ~(mask), mask)
>  
> @@ -783,8 +786,9 @@ static int bdw_init_workarounds(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
>  	 * disable bit, which we don't touch here, but it's good
>  	 * to keep in mind (see 3DSTATE_PS and 3DSTATE_WM).
>  	 */
> -	WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(GEN7_GT_MODE,
> -			  GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_MASK | GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_16x4);
> +	WA_SET_FIELD_MASKED(GEN7_GT_MODE,
> +			    GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_MASK,
> +			    GEN6_WIZ_HASHING_16x4);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-12-10  9:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-06 20:14 [PATCH] drm/i915/bdw: Fix the write setting up the WIZ hashing mode Damien Lespiau
2014-12-07  4:48 ` shuang.he
2014-12-08 12:33 ` Jani Nikula
2014-12-08 13:59   ` Damien Lespiau
2014-12-08 14:17     ` Dave Gordon
2014-12-08 14:36       ` Damien Lespiau
2014-12-08 14:21     ` Daniel Vetter
2014-12-08 14:23       ` Daniel Vetter
2014-12-08 14:46         ` Damien Lespiau
2014-12-08 16:22   ` [PATCH v2] " Damien Lespiau
2014-12-08 16:27     ` Daniel Vetter
2014-12-08 16:50       ` Dave Gordon
2014-12-08 16:54         ` Damien Lespiau
2014-12-08 16:56     ` Dave Gordon
2014-12-08 17:33       ` [PATCH v3] " Damien Lespiau
2014-12-09 22:14         ` shuang.he
2014-12-10  9:42         ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2014-12-10 12:03           ` Damien Lespiau
2014-12-10 13:55             ` Daniel Vetter
2014-12-09 19:14     ` [PATCH v2] " shuang.he

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87oarbhmdm.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=damien.lespiau@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox