public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Gaurav K Singh <gaurav.k.singh@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] drm/i915: Update the DSI disable path to	support dual link panel disabling
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 13:37:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87oarjlk76.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1417670936-31032-10-git-send-email-gaurav.k.singh@intel.com>

On Thu, 04 Dec 2014, Gaurav K Singh <gaurav.k.singh@intel.com> wrote:
> We need to program both port registers during dual link disable path.
>
> v2: Address review comments by Jani
>     - Used a for loop instead of do-while loop.
>
> v3: Used for_each_dsi_port macro instead of for loop
>
> Signed-off-by: Gaurav K Singh <gaurav.k.singh@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c |   67 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> index 22b1570..5ae4015 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> @@ -281,9 +281,8 @@ static void intel_dsi_disable(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
>  {
>  	struct drm_device *dev = encoder->base.dev;
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> -	struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(encoder->base.crtc);
>  	struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi = enc_to_intel_dsi(&encoder->base);
> -	enum port port = intel_dsi_pipe_to_port(intel_crtc->pipe);
> +	enum port port;
>  	u32 temp;
>  
>  	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("\n");
> @@ -295,23 +294,24 @@ static void intel_dsi_disable(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
>  		msleep(2);
>  	}
>  
> -	/* Panel commands can be sent when clock is in LP11 */
> -	I915_WRITE(MIPI_DEVICE_READY(port), 0x0);
> -
> -	temp = I915_READ(MIPI_CTRL(port));
> -	temp &= ~ESCAPE_CLOCK_DIVIDER_MASK;
> -	I915_WRITE(MIPI_CTRL(port), temp |
> -		   intel_dsi->escape_clk_div <<
> -		   ESCAPE_CLOCK_DIVIDER_SHIFT);
> +	for_each_dsi_port(port, intel_dsi->ports) {
> +		/* Panel commands can be sent when clock is in LP11 */
> +		I915_WRITE(MIPI_DEVICE_READY(port), 0x0);
>  
> -	I915_WRITE(MIPI_EOT_DISABLE(port), CLOCKSTOP);
> +		temp = I915_READ(MIPI_CTRL(port));
> +		temp &= ~ESCAPE_CLOCK_DIVIDER_MASK;
> +		I915_WRITE(MIPI_CTRL(port), temp |
> +			   intel_dsi->escape_clk_div <<
> +			   ESCAPE_CLOCK_DIVIDER_SHIFT);
>  
> -	temp = I915_READ(MIPI_DSI_FUNC_PRG(port));
> -	temp &= ~VID_MODE_FORMAT_MASK;
> -	I915_WRITE(MIPI_DSI_FUNC_PRG(port), temp);
> +		I915_WRITE(MIPI_EOT_DISABLE(port), CLOCKSTOP);
>  
> -	I915_WRITE(MIPI_DEVICE_READY(port), 0x1);
> +		temp = I915_READ(MIPI_DSI_FUNC_PRG(port));
> +		temp &= ~VID_MODE_FORMAT_MASK;
> +		I915_WRITE(MIPI_DSI_FUNC_PRG(port), temp);
>  
> +		I915_WRITE(MIPI_DEVICE_READY(port), 0x1);
> +	}
>  	/* if disable packets are sent before sending shutdown packet then in
>  	 * some next enable sequence send turn on packet error is observed */
>  	if (intel_dsi->dev.dev_ops->disable)
> @@ -323,31 +323,36 @@ static void intel_dsi_disable(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
>  static void intel_dsi_clear_device_ready(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
>  {
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = encoder->base.dev->dev_private;
> -	struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(encoder->base.crtc);
> -	enum port port = intel_dsi_pipe_to_port(intel_crtc->pipe);
> +	struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi = enc_to_intel_dsi(&encoder->base);
> +	enum port port;
>  	u32 val;
>  
>  	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("\n");
> +	for_each_dsi_port(port, intel_dsi->ports) {
>  
> -	I915_WRITE(MIPI_DEVICE_READY(port), DEVICE_READY | ULPS_STATE_ENTER);
> -	usleep_range(2000, 2500);
> +		I915_WRITE(MIPI_DEVICE_READY(port), DEVICE_READY |
> +							ULPS_STATE_ENTER);
> +		usleep_range(2000, 2500);
>  
> -	I915_WRITE(MIPI_DEVICE_READY(port), DEVICE_READY | ULPS_STATE_EXIT);
> -	usleep_range(2000, 2500);
> +		I915_WRITE(MIPI_DEVICE_READY(port), DEVICE_READY |
> +							ULPS_STATE_EXIT);
> +		usleep_range(2000, 2500);
>  
> -	I915_WRITE(MIPI_DEVICE_READY(port), DEVICE_READY | ULPS_STATE_ENTER);
> -	usleep_range(2000, 2500);
> +		I915_WRITE(MIPI_DEVICE_READY(port), DEVICE_READY |
> +							ULPS_STATE_ENTER);
> +		usleep_range(2000, 2500);
>  
> -	if (wait_for(((I915_READ(MIPI_PORT_CTRL(port)) & AFE_LATCHOUT)
> -		      == 0x00000), 30))
> -		DRM_ERROR("DSI LP not going Low\n");
> +		if (wait_for(((I915_READ(MIPI_PORT_CTRL(PORT_A)) & AFE_LATCHOUT)
> +							== 0x00000), 30))
> +			DRM_ERROR("DSI LP not going Low\n");

I find it a bit odd that you do the sequence for each port, while this
bit is specific to port A. It deserves a comment at the very least.

But perhaps we need several for_each_dsi_port() loops here, doing some
things for all ports, then common things (like this one, and maybe group
sleeps into one too?), then again some things for all ports, etc.

I am really not sure what the right thing is, but this *feels* a bit
odd. Please explain at least.

In the end, I don't see anything particularly wrong with the patch, so

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>


>  
> -	val = I915_READ(MIPI_PORT_CTRL(port));
> -	I915_WRITE(MIPI_PORT_CTRL(port), val & ~LP_OUTPUT_HOLD);
> -	usleep_range(1000, 1500);
> +		val = I915_READ(MIPI_PORT_CTRL(port));
> +		I915_WRITE(MIPI_PORT_CTRL(port), val & ~LP_OUTPUT_HOLD);
> +		usleep_range(1000, 1500);
>  
> -	I915_WRITE(MIPI_DEVICE_READY(port), 0x00);
> -	usleep_range(2000, 2500);
> +		I915_WRITE(MIPI_DEVICE_READY(port), 0x00);
> +		usleep_range(2000, 2500);
> +	}
>  
>  	vlv_disable_dsi_pll(encoder);
>  }
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2014-12-04 11:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-04  5:28 [PATCH 00/10] BYT DSI Dual Link Support Gaurav K Singh
2014-12-04  5:28 ` [PATCH 01/10] drm/i915: New functions added for enabling & disabling MIPI Port Ctrl reg Gaurav K Singh
2014-12-04  9:13   ` Jani Nikula
2014-12-04  5:28 ` [PATCH 02/10] drm/i915: Added port as parameter to the functions which does read/write of DSI Controller Gaurav K Singh
2014-12-04  9:14   ` Jani Nikula
2014-12-04 11:22     ` Daniel Vetter
2014-12-05 12:50       ` Singh, Gaurav K
2014-12-05 14:38         ` Daniel Vetter
2014-12-05 20:35           ` Singh, Gaurav K
2014-12-04  5:28 ` [PATCH 03/10] drm/i915: Add support for port enable/disable for dual link configuration Gaurav K Singh
2014-12-04  9:17   ` Jani Nikula
2014-12-05  8:39     ` [PATCH v4 " Gaurav K Singh
2014-12-05 12:52       ` Jani Nikula
2014-12-04  5:28 ` [PATCH 04/10] drm/i915: Pixel Clock changes for DSI dual link Gaurav K Singh
2014-12-04  9:27   ` Jani Nikula
2014-12-05  8:43     ` [PATCH v3 " Gaurav K Singh
2014-12-05 16:33     ` [PATCH " Singh, Gaurav K
2014-12-05 16:54       ` Siluvery, Arun
2014-12-05 17:18         ` Singh, Gaurav K
2014-12-05 17:36         ` Jani Nikula
2014-12-05 17:48           ` Siluvery, Arun
2014-12-05 20:43             ` Singh, Gaurav K
2014-12-04  5:28 ` [PATCH 05/10] drm/i915: Dual link needs Shutdown and Turn on packet for both ports Gaurav K Singh
2014-12-04 10:41   ` Jani Nikula
2014-12-05 19:10     ` [PATCH 5/5] " Gaurav K Singh
2014-12-05 20:53       ` Daniel Vetter
2014-12-04  5:28 ` [PATCH 06/10] drm/i915: Enable DSI PLL for both DSI0 and DSI1 in case of dual link Gaurav K Singh
2014-12-04 11:17   ` Jani Nikula
2014-12-04  5:28 ` [PATCH 07/10] drm/i915: cck reg used for checking DSI Pll locked Gaurav K Singh
2014-12-04 11:22   ` Jani Nikula
2014-12-05  8:46     ` [PATCH v2 " Gaurav K Singh
2014-12-04  5:28 ` [PATCH 08/10] drm/i915: MIPI Timings related changes for dual link Gaurav K Singh
2014-12-04 11:24   ` Jani Nikula
2014-12-04  5:28 ` [PATCH 09/10] drm/i915: Update the DSI disable path to support dual link panel disabling Gaurav K Singh
2014-12-04 11:37   ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2014-12-05  8:52     ` [PATCH v4 " Gaurav K Singh
2014-12-04  5:28 ` [PATCH 10/10] drm/i915: Update the DSI enable path to support dual link panel enabling Gaurav K Singh
2014-12-04 11:49   ` Jani Nikula
2014-12-05  8:54     ` [PATCH v4 10/10] drm/i915: Update the DSI enable path to support dual Gaurav K Singh
2014-12-05 20:31       ` [PATCH " Gaurav K Singh
2014-12-05  4:04   ` [PATCH 10/10] drm/i915: Update the DSI enable path to support dual link panel enabling shuang.he

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87oarjlk76.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gaurav.k.singh@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=shobhit.kumar@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox