From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: "Kahola, Mika" <mika.kahola@intel.com>,
"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] drm/i915/cx0: split out mtl_get_cx0_buf_trans() to c10 and c20 variants
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2024 11:21:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87plm73isn.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <MW4PR11MB7054E2FC4DA3275E9FF14F42EF372@MW4PR11MB7054.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On Wed, 04 Dec 2024, "Kahola, Mika" <mika.kahola@intel.com> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>> Sent: Friday, 29 November 2024 13.42
>> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
>> Cc: Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula@intel.com>; Kahola, Mika <mika.kahola@intel.com>
>> Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915/cx0: split out mtl_get_cx0_buf_trans() to c10 and c20
>> variants
>>
>> The PHY is either c10 or c20, there's no need to check at runtime and complicate
>> the conditions in mtl_get_cx0_buf_trans().
>>
>> While at it, replace the direct port clock check with intel_dp_is_uhbr().
>>
>> Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
>
> The change is reasonable and solid.
>
> Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Thanks, pushed to drm-intel-next.
BR,
Jani.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>> ---
>> .../drm/i915/display/intel_ddi_buf_trans.c | 23 +++++++++++++------
>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi_buf_trans.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi_buf_trans.c
>> index 4d21ce734343..9389b295036e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi_buf_trans.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi_buf_trans.c
>> @@ -1687,18 +1687,24 @@ dg2_get_snps_buf_trans(struct intel_encoder
>> *encoder, }
>>
>> static const struct intel_ddi_buf_trans * -mtl_get_cx0_buf_trans(struct
>> intel_encoder *encoder,
>> +mtl_get_c10_buf_trans(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>> const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>> int *n_entries)
>> {
>> - if (intel_crtc_has_dp_encoder(crtc_state) && crtc_state->port_clock >=
>> 1000000)
>> + return intel_get_buf_trans(&mtl_c10_trans_dp14, n_entries); }
>> +
>> +static const struct intel_ddi_buf_trans * mtl_get_c20_buf_trans(struct
>> +intel_encoder *encoder,
>> + const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>> + int *n_entries)
>> +{
>> + if (intel_crtc_has_dp_encoder(crtc_state) &&
>> +intel_dp_is_uhbr(crtc_state))
>> return intel_get_buf_trans(&mtl_c20_trans_uhbr, n_entries);
>> - else if (intel_crtc_has_type(crtc_state, INTEL_OUTPUT_HDMI) &&
>> !(intel_encoder_is_c10phy(encoder)))
>> + else if (intel_crtc_has_type(crtc_state, INTEL_OUTPUT_HDMI))
>> return intel_get_buf_trans(&mtl_c20_trans_hdmi, n_entries);
>> - else if (!intel_encoder_is_c10phy(encoder))
>> - return intel_get_buf_trans(&mtl_c20_trans_dp14, n_entries);
>> else
>> - return intel_get_buf_trans(&mtl_c10_trans_dp14, n_entries);
>> + return intel_get_buf_trans(&mtl_c20_trans_dp14, n_entries);
>> }
>>
>> void intel_ddi_buf_trans_init(struct intel_encoder *encoder) @@ -1706,7
>> +1712,10 @@ void intel_ddi_buf_trans_init(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
>> struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(encoder->base.dev);
>>
>> if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 14) {
>> - encoder->get_buf_trans = mtl_get_cx0_buf_trans;
>> + if (intel_encoder_is_c10phy(encoder))
>> + encoder->get_buf_trans = mtl_get_c10_buf_trans;
>> + else
>> + encoder->get_buf_trans = mtl_get_c20_buf_trans;
>> } else if (IS_DG2(i915)) {
>> encoder->get_buf_trans = dg2_get_snps_buf_trans;
>> } else if (IS_ALDERLAKE_P(i915)) {
>> --
>> 2.39.5
>
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-04 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-29 11:41 [PATCH] drm/i915/cx0: split out mtl_get_cx0_buf_trans() to c10 and c20 variants Jani Nikula
2024-11-29 12:23 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2024-11-29 16:39 ` ✓ i915.CI.Full: " Patchwork
2024-12-04 8:54 ` [PATCH] " Kahola, Mika
2024-12-04 9:21 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87plm73isn.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=mika.kahola@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).