From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/7] drm/i915: Parameterize PWRCTX_MAXCNT
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 13:06:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pmozalyu.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220108044055.3123418-3-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
On Fri, 07 Jan 2022, Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> wrote:
> Rather than having separate definitions for each engine, create a single
> parameterized macro that takes the engine base offset. This will also
> ensure we get to the proper offset if we ever need to use these
> registers on newer platforms (where the media engine offsets have
> changed).
>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rc6.c | 8 ++++----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 6 +-----
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rc6.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rc6.c
> index c3155ee58689..45891e6f0b98 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rc6.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rc6.c
> @@ -449,10 +449,10 @@ static bool bxt_check_bios_rc6_setup(struct intel_rc6 *rc6)
> enable_rc6 = false;
> }
>
> - if (!((intel_uncore_read(uncore, PWRCTX_MAXCNT_RCSUNIT) & IDLE_TIME_MASK) > 1 &&
> - (intel_uncore_read(uncore, PWRCTX_MAXCNT_VCSUNIT0) & IDLE_TIME_MASK) > 1 &&
> - (intel_uncore_read(uncore, PWRCTX_MAXCNT_BCSUNIT) & IDLE_TIME_MASK) > 1 &&
> - (intel_uncore_read(uncore, PWRCTX_MAXCNT_VECSUNIT) & IDLE_TIME_MASK) > 1)) {
> + if (!((intel_uncore_read(uncore, PWRCTX_MAXCNT(RENDER_RING_BASE)) & IDLE_TIME_MASK) > 1 &&
> + (intel_uncore_read(uncore, PWRCTX_MAXCNT(GEN6_BSD_RING_BASE)) & IDLE_TIME_MASK) > 1 &&
> + (intel_uncore_read(uncore, PWRCTX_MAXCNT(BLT_RING_BASE)) & IDLE_TIME_MASK) > 1 &&
> + (intel_uncore_read(uncore, PWRCTX_MAXCNT(VEBOX_RING_BASE)) & IDLE_TIME_MASK) > 1)) {
> drm_dbg(&i915->drm,
> "Engine Idle wait time not set properly.\n");
> enable_rc6 = false;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index 86e459010465..23330faecf07 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -9297,11 +9297,7 @@ enum {
> #define RC6_CTX_IN_DRAM (1 << 0)
> #define RC6_CTX_BASE _MMIO(0xD48)
> #define RC6_CTX_BASE_MASK 0xFFFFFFF0
> -#define PWRCTX_MAXCNT_RCSUNIT _MMIO(0x2054)
> -#define PWRCTX_MAXCNT_VCSUNIT0 _MMIO(0x12054)
> -#define PWRCTX_MAXCNT_BCSUNIT _MMIO(0x22054)
> -#define PWRCTX_MAXCNT_VECSUNIT _MMIO(0x1A054)
> -#define PWRCTX_MAXCNT_VCSUNIT1 _MMIO(0x1C054)
> +#define PWRCTX_MAXCNT(base) _MMIO((base) + 0x54)
> #define IDLE_TIME_MASK 0xFFFFF
> #define FORCEWAKE _MMIO(0xA18C)
> #define FORCEWAKE_VLV _MMIO(0x1300b0)
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-10 11:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-08 4:40 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 0/7] Start cleaning up register definitions Matt Roper
2022-01-08 4:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/7] drm/i915: Use parameterized GPR register definitions everywhere Matt Roper
2022-01-10 11:20 ` Jani Nikula
2022-01-08 4:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/7] drm/i915: Parameterize PWRCTX_MAXCNT Matt Roper
2022-01-10 11:06 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2022-01-08 4:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/7] drm/i915: Parameterize ECOSKPD Matt Roper
2022-01-10 11:10 ` Jani Nikula
2022-01-08 4:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/7] drm/i915: Use RING_PSMI_CTL rather than per-engine macros Matt Roper
2022-01-10 11:14 ` Jani Nikula
2022-01-08 4:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 5/7] drm/i915: Replace GFX_MODE_GEN7 with RING_MODE_GEN7 Matt Roper
2022-01-10 11:15 ` Jani Nikula
2022-01-08 4:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 6/7] drm/i915/gt: Move engine registers to their own header Matt Roper
2022-01-10 10:59 ` Jani Nikula
2022-01-08 4:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 7/7] drm/i915: Move SNPS PHY " Matt Roper
2022-01-10 11:02 ` Jani Nikula
2022-01-10 11:03 ` Jani Nikula
2022-01-08 5:12 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Start cleaning up register definitions (rev2) Patchwork
2022-01-08 5:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-01-08 5:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-01-08 7:00 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87pmozalyu.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox