[PATCH] drm/i915: fix spelling mistake "reserverd" -> "reserved"

[PATCH] drm/i915: fix spelling mistake "reserverd" -> "reserved"

[Alexandre Belloni]

Fix a spelling mistake in a comment.

Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
index f9ce35da4123..742f8ff101e4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
@@ -4280,7 +4280,7 @@ static void gen10_sseu_device_status(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 	for (s = 0; s < info->sseu.max_slices; s++) {
 		/*
 		 * FIXME: Valid SS Mask respects the spec and read
-		 * only valid bits for those registers, excluding reserverd
+		 * only valid bits for those registers, excluding reserved
 		 * although this seems wrong because it would leave many
 		 * subslices without ACK.
 		 */
-- 
2.19.1

✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: fix spelling mistake "reserverd" -> "reserved"

[Patchwork]

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915: fix spelling mistake "reserverd" -> "reserved"
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/52800/
State : success

== Summary ==

= CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_5175 -> Patchwork_10873 =

== Summary - SUCCESS ==

  No regressions found.

  External URL: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/52800/revisions/1/mbox/

== Known issues ==

  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_10873 that come from known issues:

  === IGT changes ===

    ==== Issues hit ====

    igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists:
      fi-apl-guc:         PASS -> INCOMPLETE (fdo#108622, fdo#103927)

    igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@read-crc-pipe-b:
      fi-byt-clapper:     PASS -> FAIL (fdo#107362)

    
    ==== Possible fixes ====

    igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@basic:
      fi-byt-clapper:     FAIL (fdo#103167) -> PASS

    
  fdo#103167 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103167
  fdo#103927 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103927
  fdo#107362 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107362
  fdo#108622 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108622


== Participating hosts (52 -> 46) ==

  Missing    (6): fi-kbl-soraka fi-ilk-m540 fi-hsw-4200u fi-byt-squawks fi-bsw-cyan fi-ctg-p8600 


== Build changes ==

    * Linux: CI_DRM_5175 -> Patchwork_10873

  CI_DRM_5175: eccbba7017aafd70e09bb105c8a6b85572a93eb8 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  IGT_4723: 53bb24ad410b53cdd96f15ced8fd5921c8ab0eac @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
  Patchwork_10873: a454eb85ca0121acd2cbcd279e4fdc42047705a8 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux


== Linux commits ==

a454eb85ca01 drm/i915: fix spelling mistake "reserverd" -> "reserved"

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_10873/issues.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: fix spelling mistake "reserverd" -> "reserved"

[Jani Nikula]

On Tue, 20 Nov 2018, Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> wrote:
> Fix a spelling mistake in a comment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>

Thanks for the patch, pushed to drm-intel-next-queued.

BR,
Jani.

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index f9ce35da4123..742f8ff101e4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -4280,7 +4280,7 @@ static void gen10_sseu_device_status(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  	for (s = 0; s < info->sseu.max_slices; s++) {
>  		/*
>  		 * FIXME: Valid SS Mask respects the spec and read
> -		 * only valid bits for those registers, excluding reserverd
> +		 * only valid bits for those registers, excluding reserved
>  		 * although this seems wrong because it would leave many
>  		 * subslices without ACK.
>  		 */

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center