From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Anholt Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Check whether the output is running after completing the modeswitch Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:07:45 -0700 Message-ID: <87pqp93lem.fsf@pollan.anholt.net> References: <1301406226-13396-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1016357052==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1301406226-13396-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Chris Wilson , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org --===============1016357052== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" --=-=-= On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 14:43:46 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > Proof-of-concept sanity check to see if we did successfully enable the > pipe. Without a means of report back the error and forcibly reverting back > to the previous configuration, the error message is a little useless. I still like it -- it's something that could be watched for in testing, at least. Did you find that some failures to successfully program modes not incrementing scanlines? --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk2SEeEACgkQHUdvYGzw6vcpogCfZajJEVQLcEdBekyvaP5WDAKa vkMAn0ux2C+2PmcxLHyNW45WWr4ylXQV =Q3Fj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- --===============1016357052== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx --===============1016357052==--