From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB151C48297 for ; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 12:07:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3907310F09E; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 12:07:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: gabe.freedesktop.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Z1pukkJQ"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.19]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB03210EE80; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 12:07:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1707480449; x=1739016449; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date: message-id:mime-version; bh=jsV1Z2yguwUVdxBBsziY9m+bhLEE+xWD3WOAuTiGCC0=; b=Z1pukkJQToLfU/8nBypqcb8mTCyElsvXcV6qOXj95Aj3WY/sQDmumhEO bnTJbUTddWq8gdEyNLQGzOrKG1/Yx5jOx6+pOe57v8M1J2SqZBajhPE8c rn680GGaTpx32tFQqChPX6HLz1qMQ09QG1bpMjMJQKcPDQPQ2vCwlj8Gv T6aQMtaCjjPQ+dgTiPtE59kLfUk0ciNAaXDKtYiH0e50QXM2SuQQzEmWs Oyjc61harJwlCIhRsPseURFCC78f1bX3X/Vnn4m6rWsz0TYz9+T+Qbv6a 4b39NfVW0l1XlH45i6jgw5Ngl8kYrKQs54k4ZRhnSQxTKigjqFYgscXDx w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10978"; a="1274632" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.05,256,1701158400"; d="scan'208";a="1274632" Received: from orviesa010.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.150]) by orvoesa111.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Feb 2024 04:07:28 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.05,256,1701158400"; d="scan'208";a="1955382" Received: from dfischbe-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.252.62.64]) by orviesa010-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Feb 2024 04:07:26 -0800 From: Jani Nikula To: Lucas De Marchi Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Thomas =?utf-8?Q?Hellstr=C3=B6m?= , Oded Gabbay , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 09/10] drm/xe: switch from drm_debug_printer() to device specific drm_dbg_printer() In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo References: <35929b030f7ba67cd32808d42e916aa9cfb5709d.1705410327.git.jani.nikula@intel.com> <87y1c4fis8.fsf@intel.com> Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2024 14:07:22 +0200 Message-ID: <87r0hlalj9.fsf@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" On Thu, 01 Feb 2024, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > Do you plan to also merge the last patch where you remove > drm_debug_printer()? Any conflict to be solved in the merge commit? > > This is just a question to know what's the plan, not preferring > something else. I looked into it, didn't see any conflicts, and merged away. Hopefully none pop up until the branches merge again. > Acked-by: Lucas De Marchi Thanks, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel