From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/display: Add bits for link_n_exended for DISPLAY >= 14
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2024 16:22:35 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87seuep750.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240905115505.3629087-2-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
On Thu, 05 Sep 2024, Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com> wrote:
> LINK_N register has bits 31:24 for extended link N value used for
> HDMI2.1 and for an alternate mode of operation of DP TG DDA
> (Bspec:50488).
>
> Add support for these extra bits.
Please throw away the link_n_ext member, and go from there. Most of the
changes here are unnecessary.
Mask N after reading and before writing to 24 bits on older platforms,
don't mask on display >= 14.
That's all there is to it.
BR,
Jani.
> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 31 +++++++++++++++----
> .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index b4ef4d59da1a..60cdd7a37b03 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -2595,6 +2595,8 @@ intel_link_compute_m_n(u16 bits_per_pixel_x16, int nlanes,
> compute_m_n(&m_n->link_m, &m_n->link_n,
> pixel_clock, link_symbol_clock,
> 0x80000);
> +
> + m_n->link_n_ext = 0;
> }
>
> void intel_panel_sanitize_ssc(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> @@ -2632,6 +2634,7 @@ void intel_set_m_n(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> i915_reg_t data_m_reg, i915_reg_t data_n_reg,
> i915_reg_t link_m_reg, i915_reg_t link_n_reg)
> {
> + u8 link_n_ext = 0;
> intel_de_write(i915, data_m_reg, TU_SIZE(m_n->tu) | m_n->data_m);
> intel_de_write(i915, data_n_reg, m_n->data_n);
> intel_de_write(i915, link_m_reg, m_n->link_m);
> @@ -2639,7 +2642,11 @@ void intel_set_m_n(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> * On BDW+ writing LINK_N arms the double buffered update
> * of all the M/N registers, so it must be written last.
> */
> - intel_de_write(i915, link_n_reg, m_n->link_n);
> +
> + if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 14 && m_n->link_n_ext)
> + link_n_ext = PIPE_LINK_N1_EXTENDED(m_n->link_n_ext);
> +
> + intel_de_write(i915, link_n_reg, m_n->link_n | link_n_ext);
> }
>
> bool intel_cpu_transcoder_has_m2_n2(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> @@ -3346,8 +3353,17 @@ void intel_get_m_n(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> i915_reg_t data_m_reg, i915_reg_t data_n_reg,
> i915_reg_t link_m_reg, i915_reg_t link_n_reg)
> {
> + u32 link_n;
> +
> m_n->link_m = intel_de_read(i915, link_m_reg) & DATA_LINK_M_N_MASK;
> - m_n->link_n = intel_de_read(i915, link_n_reg) & DATA_LINK_M_N_MASK;
> +
> + link_n = intel_de_read(i915, link_n_reg);
> + m_n->link_n = link_n & DATA_LINK_M_N_MASK;
> + if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 14)
> + m_n->link_n_ext = REG_FIELD_GET(PIPE_LINK_N1_EXTENDED_MASK, link_n);
> + else
> + m_n->link_n_ext = 0;
> +
> m_n->data_m = intel_de_read(i915, data_m_reg) & DATA_LINK_M_N_MASK;
> m_n->data_n = intel_de_read(i915, data_n_reg) & DATA_LINK_M_N_MASK;
> m_n->tu = REG_FIELD_GET(TU_SIZE_MASK, intel_de_read(i915, data_m_reg)) + 1;
> @@ -4843,7 +4859,8 @@ intel_compare_link_m_n(const struct intel_link_m_n *m_n,
> m_n->data_m == m2_n2->data_m &&
> m_n->data_n == m2_n2->data_n &&
> m_n->link_m == m2_n2->link_m &&
> - m_n->link_n == m2_n2->link_n;
> + m_n->link_n == m2_n2->link_n &&
> + m_n->link_n_ext == m2_n2->link_n_ext;
> }
>
> static bool
> @@ -5133,18 +5150,20 @@ intel_pipe_config_compare(const struct intel_crtc_state *current_config,
> if (!intel_compare_link_m_n(¤t_config->name, \
> &pipe_config->name)) { \
> pipe_config_mismatch(&p, fastset, crtc, __stringify(name), \
> - "(expected tu %i data %i/%i link %i/%i, " \
> - "found tu %i, data %i/%i link %i/%i)", \
> + "(expected tu %i data %i/%i link %i/%i link_n_ext %i, " \
> + "found tu %i, data %i/%i link %i/%i link_n_ext %i)", \
> current_config->name.tu, \
> current_config->name.data_m, \
> current_config->name.data_n, \
> current_config->name.link_m, \
> current_config->name.link_n, \
> + current_config->name.link_n_ext, \
> pipe_config->name.tu, \
> pipe_config->name.data_m, \
> pipe_config->name.data_n, \
> pipe_config->name.link_m, \
> - pipe_config->name.link_n); \
> + pipe_config->name.link_n, \
> + pipe_config->name.link_n_ext); \
> ret = false; \
> } \
> } while (0)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> index f29e5dc3db91..1328e2e89786 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> @@ -1028,6 +1028,7 @@ struct intel_link_m_n {
> u32 data_n;
> u32 link_m;
> u32 link_n;
> + u8 link_n_ext;
> };
>
> struct intel_csc_matrix {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index 41f4350a7c6c..941d273dbf8c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -2172,6 +2172,8 @@
> #define _PIPEB_DATA_N2 0x6103c
> #define _PIPEB_LINK_M1 0x61040
> #define _PIPEB_LINK_N1 0x61044
> +#define PIPE_LINK_N1_EXTENDED_MASK REG_GENMASK(31, 24)
> +#define PIPE_LINK_N1_EXTENDED(val) REG_FIELD_PREP(PIPE_LINK_N1_EXTENDED_MASK, (val))
> #define _PIPEB_LINK_M2 0x61048
> #define _PIPEB_LINK_N2 0x6104c
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-05 13:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-05 11:55 [PATCH 0/5] Implement Wa_14021768792 to bypass m_n ratio limit Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-05 11:55 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/display: Add bits for link_n_exended for DISPLAY >= 14 Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-05 13:22 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2024-09-05 14:38 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-09-05 11:55 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915/display: Limit m/n ratio to 10 for display > 12 Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-05 11:55 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915/display: Add bits for Wa_14021768792 for linkm/n ratio > 10 Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-05 11:55 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915/display: Implement Wa_14021768792 for BMG DP for link_m/n " Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-05 11:55 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Add Wa_14021768792 as per WA framework Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-06 9:11 ` Jani Nikula
2024-09-05 15:05 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Implement Wa_14021768792 to bypass m_n ratio limit Patchwork
2024-09-05 15:05 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2024-09-05 15:35 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-09-07 6:20 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87seuep750.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).