From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21AA8C433F5 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 15:50:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E022561247 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 15:50:39 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org E022561247 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BE556E512; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 15:50:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 489C96E512 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 15:50:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1631634636; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=jJZEdwvFQ3ljWbLKCYoI62KGMcI1gt7/agR2sAPSxa0=; b=XRtPb7vWBFqmWqr0JaSO+N7EC7b524wqv47V4WczEDyw9EePkg1o/a/Bqu4CSBHXRcRybc jVIQZYWg/RzCBJaosvKdSz8Q6c/XI8xRnezXEg8cSwTH9QZzx6SzcxuTeAHwBp1/Cuk3PQ lpUnfJIu4jd/TiuxheWVXwJcaB0dsn4= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-161-GmG0s0aDNHqI4HgOwagdZQ-1; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 11:50:35 -0400 X-MC-Unique: GmG0s0aDNHqI4HgOwagdZQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB3DFCC623; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 15:50:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.39.193.211]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28282100AE35; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 15:50:27 +0000 (UTC) From: Cornelia Huck To: Christoph Hellwig , Jason Gunthorpe Cc: David Airlie , Tony Krowiak , Alex Williamson , Christian Borntraeger , Daniel Vetter , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Eric Farman , Harald Freudenberger , Vasily Gorbik , Heiko Carstens , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, Jani Nikula , Jason Herne , Joonas Lahtinen , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Kirti Wankhede , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Matthew Rosato , Peter Oberparleiter , Halil Pasic , Rodrigo Vivi , Vineeth Vijayan , Zhenyu Wang , Zhi Wang , Christoph Hellwig In-Reply-To: Organization: Red Hat GmbH References: <0-v2-7d3a384024cf+2060-ccw_mdev_jgg@nvidia.com> <1-v2-7d3a384024cf+2060-ccw_mdev_jgg@nvidia.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.32.1 (https://notmuchmail.org) Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 17:50:25 +0200 Message-ID: <87sfy7gnr2.fsf@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/9] vfio/ccw: Use functions for alloc/free of the vfio_ccw_private X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" On Fri, Sep 10 2021, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 04:38:41PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: >> + >> + private = kzalloc(sizeof(*private), GFP_KERNEL | GFP_DMA); >> + if (!private) >> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); > > Nit: there is no need to add GFP_KERNEL when using GFP_DMA. > > Also a question to the s390 maintainers: why do we need 31-bit > addressability for the main private data structure? I don't think we need it anymore since c98e16b2fa12 ("s390/cio: Convert ccw_io_region to pointer") and probably should just drop the GFP_DMA.