* [PATCH] drm/i915/bxt: BLC implementation
@ 2015-05-05 9:21 Vandana Kannan
2015-05-05 11:33 ` Jani Nikula
2015-05-05 14:30 ` shuang.he
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Vandana Kannan @ 2015-05-05 9:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
Enabling BLC on BXT.
Includes register definition, and new functions for BXT.
In BXT, there are 2 sets of registers for BLC. Until there is clarity
about which set would be effective, set 1 is being used.
This would have to be re-visited if there is any change or when 2 LFPs are
enabled on BXT.
This patch enables brightness change which would be effected by use of
hot-keys or sysfs entry.
TODO:- BLC implementation will have to re-visited when
1. there is clarity about which set of registers has to be used and when.
2. CDCLK frequency is changed
v2: Jani's review comments
- Modified comment in i915_reg.h
- Renamed register defintions
- Removed definition of duty cycle max. Not required now and its not 64-bit.
v3:
- Rebase on top of VLV/CHV backlight changes, in particuliar
bxt_set_backlight() now has a different prototype (Damien)
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vandana Kannan <vandana.kannan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Shankar, Uma <uma.shankar@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 12 ++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
index 36805b6..9d79e17 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
@@ -3480,6 +3480,18 @@ enum skl_disp_power_wells {
#define UTIL_PIN_CTL 0x48400
#define UTIL_PIN_ENABLE (1 << 31)
+/* BXT backlight register definition. */
+#define BXT_BLC_PWM_CTL1 0xC8250
+#define BXT_BLC_PWM_ENABLE (1 << 31)
+#define BXT_BLC_PWM_POLARITY (1 << 29)
+#define BXT_BLC_PWM_FREQ1 0xC8254
+#define BXT_BLC_PWM_DUTY1 0xC8258
+
+#define BXT_BLC_PWM_CTL2 0xC8350
+#define BXT_BLC_PWM_FREQ2 0xC8354
+#define BXT_BLC_PWM_DUTY2 0xC8358
+
+
#define PCH_GTC_CTL 0xe7000
#define PCH_GTC_ENABLE (1 << 31)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
index d8686ce..06d0953 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
@@ -535,6 +535,14 @@ static u32 vlv_get_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector)
return _vlv_get_backlight(dev, pipe);
}
+static u32 bxt_get_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector)
+{
+ struct drm_device *dev = connector->base.dev;
+ struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
+
+ return I915_READ(BXT_BLC_PWM_DUTY1);
+}
+
static u32 intel_panel_get_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector)
{
struct drm_device *dev = connector->base.dev;
@@ -615,6 +623,14 @@ static void vlv_set_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector, u32 level)
I915_WRITE(VLV_BLC_PWM_CTL(pipe), tmp | level);
}
+static void bxt_set_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector, u32 level)
+{
+ struct drm_device *dev = connector->base.dev;
+ struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
+
+ I915_WRITE(BXT_BLC_PWM_DUTY1, level);
+}
+
static void
intel_panel_actually_set_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector, u32 level)
{
@@ -740,6 +756,18 @@ static void vlv_disable_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector)
I915_WRITE(VLV_BLC_PWM_CTL2(pipe), tmp & ~BLM_PWM_ENABLE);
}
+static void bxt_disable_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector)
+{
+ struct drm_device *dev = connector->base.dev;
+ struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
+ u32 tmp;
+
+ intel_panel_actually_set_backlight(connector, 0);
+
+ tmp = I915_READ(BXT_BLC_PWM_CTL1);
+ I915_WRITE(BXT_BLC_PWM_CTL1, tmp & ~BXT_BLC_PWM_ENABLE);
+}
+
void intel_panel_disable_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector)
{
struct drm_device *dev = connector->base.dev;
@@ -946,6 +974,33 @@ static void vlv_enable_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector)
I915_WRITE(VLV_BLC_PWM_CTL2(pipe), ctl2 | BLM_PWM_ENABLE);
}
+static void bxt_enable_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector)
+{
+ struct drm_device *dev = connector->base.dev;
+ struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
+ struct intel_panel *panel = &connector->panel;
+ u32 pwm_ctl;
+
+ pwm_ctl = I915_READ(BXT_BLC_PWM_CTL1);
+ if (pwm_ctl & BXT_BLC_PWM_ENABLE) {
+ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("backlight already enabled\n");
+ pwm_ctl &= ~BXT_BLC_PWM_ENABLE;
+ I915_WRITE(BXT_BLC_PWM_CTL1, pwm_ctl);
+ }
+
+ I915_WRITE(BXT_BLC_PWM_FREQ1, panel->backlight.max);
+
+ intel_panel_actually_set_backlight(connector, panel->backlight.level);
+
+ pwm_ctl = 0;
+ if (panel->backlight.active_low_pwm)
+ pwm_ctl |= BXT_BLC_PWM_POLARITY;
+
+ I915_WRITE(BXT_BLC_PWM_CTL1, pwm_ctl);
+ POSTING_READ(BXT_BLC_PWM_CTL1);
+ I915_WRITE(BXT_BLC_PWM_CTL1, pwm_ctl | BXT_BLC_PWM_ENABLE);
+}
+
void intel_panel_enable_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector)
{
struct drm_device *dev = connector->base.dev;
@@ -1298,6 +1353,30 @@ static int vlv_setup_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector, enum pipe pipe
return 0;
}
+static int
+bxt_setup_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector, enum pipe unused)
+{
+ struct drm_device *dev = connector->base.dev;
+ struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
+ struct intel_panel *panel = &connector->panel;
+ u32 pwm_ctl, val;
+
+ pwm_ctl = I915_READ(BXT_BLC_PWM_CTL1);
+ panel->backlight.active_low_pwm = pwm_ctl & BXT_BLC_PWM_POLARITY;
+
+ panel->backlight.max = I915_READ(BXT_BLC_PWM_FREQ1);
+ if (!panel->backlight.max)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ val = bxt_get_backlight(connector);
+ panel->backlight.level = intel_panel_compute_brightness(connector, val);
+
+ panel->backlight.enabled = (pwm_ctl & BXT_BLC_PWM_ENABLE) &&
+ panel->backlight.level != 0;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
int intel_panel_setup_backlight(struct drm_connector *connector, enum pipe pipe)
{
struct drm_device *dev = connector->dev;
@@ -1349,7 +1428,13 @@ void intel_panel_init_backlight_funcs(struct drm_device *dev)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
- if (IS_BROADWELL(dev) || (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 9)) {
+ if (IS_BROXTON(dev)) {
+ dev_priv->display.setup_backlight = bxt_setup_backlight;
+ dev_priv->display.enable_backlight = bxt_enable_backlight;
+ dev_priv->display.disable_backlight = bxt_disable_backlight;
+ dev_priv->display.set_backlight = bxt_set_backlight;
+ dev_priv->display.get_backlight = bxt_get_backlight;
+ } else if (IS_BROADWELL(dev) || IS_SKYLAKE(dev)) {
dev_priv->display.setup_backlight = bdw_setup_backlight;
dev_priv->display.enable_backlight = bdw_enable_backlight;
dev_priv->display.disable_backlight = pch_disable_backlight;
--
2.0.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/bxt: BLC implementation
2015-05-05 9:21 [PATCH] drm/i915/bxt: BLC implementation Vandana Kannan
@ 2015-05-05 11:33 ` Jani Nikula
2015-05-06 11:17 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-05-05 14:30 ` shuang.he
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2015-05-05 11:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vandana Kannan, intel-gfx
On Tue, 05 May 2015, Vandana Kannan <vandana.kannan@intel.com> wrote:
> Enabling BLC on BXT.
> Includes register definition, and new functions for BXT.
>
> In BXT, there are 2 sets of registers for BLC. Until there is clarity
> about which set would be effective, set 1 is being used.
> This would have to be re-visited if there is any change or when 2 LFPs are
> enabled on BXT.
>
> This patch enables brightness change which would be effected by use of
> hot-keys or sysfs entry.
>
> TODO:- BLC implementation will have to re-visited when
> 1. there is clarity about which set of registers has to be used and when.
> 2. CDCLK frequency is changed
>
> v2: Jani's review comments
> - Modified comment in i915_reg.h
> - Renamed register defintions
> - Removed definition of duty cycle max. Not required now and its not 64-bit.
>
> v3:
> - Rebase on top of VLV/CHV backlight changes, in particuliar
> bxt_set_backlight() now has a different prototype (Damien)
>
> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Yup.
> Signed-off-by: Vandana Kannan <vandana.kannan@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Shankar, Uma <uma.shankar@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 12 ++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index 36805b6..9d79e17 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -3480,6 +3480,18 @@ enum skl_disp_power_wells {
> #define UTIL_PIN_CTL 0x48400
> #define UTIL_PIN_ENABLE (1 << 31)
>
> +/* BXT backlight register definition. */
> +#define BXT_BLC_PWM_CTL1 0xC8250
> +#define BXT_BLC_PWM_ENABLE (1 << 31)
> +#define BXT_BLC_PWM_POLARITY (1 << 29)
> +#define BXT_BLC_PWM_FREQ1 0xC8254
> +#define BXT_BLC_PWM_DUTY1 0xC8258
> +
> +#define BXT_BLC_PWM_CTL2 0xC8350
> +#define BXT_BLC_PWM_FREQ2 0xC8354
> +#define BXT_BLC_PWM_DUTY2 0xC8358
> +
> +
> #define PCH_GTC_CTL 0xe7000
> #define PCH_GTC_ENABLE (1 << 31)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
> index d8686ce..06d0953 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
> @@ -535,6 +535,14 @@ static u32 vlv_get_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector)
> return _vlv_get_backlight(dev, pipe);
> }
>
> +static u32 bxt_get_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector)
> +{
> + struct drm_device *dev = connector->base.dev;
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> +
> + return I915_READ(BXT_BLC_PWM_DUTY1);
> +}
> +
> static u32 intel_panel_get_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector)
> {
> struct drm_device *dev = connector->base.dev;
> @@ -615,6 +623,14 @@ static void vlv_set_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector, u32 level)
> I915_WRITE(VLV_BLC_PWM_CTL(pipe), tmp | level);
> }
>
> +static void bxt_set_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector, u32 level)
> +{
> + struct drm_device *dev = connector->base.dev;
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> +
> + I915_WRITE(BXT_BLC_PWM_DUTY1, level);
> +}
> +
> static void
> intel_panel_actually_set_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector, u32 level)
> {
> @@ -740,6 +756,18 @@ static void vlv_disable_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector)
> I915_WRITE(VLV_BLC_PWM_CTL2(pipe), tmp & ~BLM_PWM_ENABLE);
> }
>
> +static void bxt_disable_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector)
> +{
> + struct drm_device *dev = connector->base.dev;
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> + u32 tmp;
> +
> + intel_panel_actually_set_backlight(connector, 0);
> +
> + tmp = I915_READ(BXT_BLC_PWM_CTL1);
> + I915_WRITE(BXT_BLC_PWM_CTL1, tmp & ~BXT_BLC_PWM_ENABLE);
> +}
> +
> void intel_panel_disable_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector)
> {
> struct drm_device *dev = connector->base.dev;
> @@ -946,6 +974,33 @@ static void vlv_enable_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector)
> I915_WRITE(VLV_BLC_PWM_CTL2(pipe), ctl2 | BLM_PWM_ENABLE);
> }
>
> +static void bxt_enable_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector)
> +{
> + struct drm_device *dev = connector->base.dev;
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> + struct intel_panel *panel = &connector->panel;
> + u32 pwm_ctl;
> +
> + pwm_ctl = I915_READ(BXT_BLC_PWM_CTL1);
> + if (pwm_ctl & BXT_BLC_PWM_ENABLE) {
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("backlight already enabled\n");
> + pwm_ctl &= ~BXT_BLC_PWM_ENABLE;
> + I915_WRITE(BXT_BLC_PWM_CTL1, pwm_ctl);
> + }
> +
> + I915_WRITE(BXT_BLC_PWM_FREQ1, panel->backlight.max);
> +
> + intel_panel_actually_set_backlight(connector, panel->backlight.level);
> +
> + pwm_ctl = 0;
> + if (panel->backlight.active_low_pwm)
> + pwm_ctl |= BXT_BLC_PWM_POLARITY;
> +
> + I915_WRITE(BXT_BLC_PWM_CTL1, pwm_ctl);
> + POSTING_READ(BXT_BLC_PWM_CTL1);
> + I915_WRITE(BXT_BLC_PWM_CTL1, pwm_ctl | BXT_BLC_PWM_ENABLE);
> +}
> +
> void intel_panel_enable_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector)
> {
> struct drm_device *dev = connector->base.dev;
> @@ -1298,6 +1353,30 @@ static int vlv_setup_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector, enum pipe pipe
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int
> +bxt_setup_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector, enum pipe unused)
> +{
> + struct drm_device *dev = connector->base.dev;
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> + struct intel_panel *panel = &connector->panel;
> + u32 pwm_ctl, val;
> +
> + pwm_ctl = I915_READ(BXT_BLC_PWM_CTL1);
> + panel->backlight.active_low_pwm = pwm_ctl & BXT_BLC_PWM_POLARITY;
> +
> + panel->backlight.max = I915_READ(BXT_BLC_PWM_FREQ1);
> + if (!panel->backlight.max)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + val = bxt_get_backlight(connector);
> + panel->backlight.level = intel_panel_compute_brightness(connector, val);
> +
> + panel->backlight.enabled = (pwm_ctl & BXT_BLC_PWM_ENABLE) &&
> + panel->backlight.level != 0;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> int intel_panel_setup_backlight(struct drm_connector *connector, enum pipe pipe)
> {
> struct drm_device *dev = connector->dev;
> @@ -1349,7 +1428,13 @@ void intel_panel_init_backlight_funcs(struct drm_device *dev)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>
> - if (IS_BROADWELL(dev) || (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 9)) {
> + if (IS_BROXTON(dev)) {
> + dev_priv->display.setup_backlight = bxt_setup_backlight;
> + dev_priv->display.enable_backlight = bxt_enable_backlight;
> + dev_priv->display.disable_backlight = bxt_disable_backlight;
> + dev_priv->display.set_backlight = bxt_set_backlight;
> + dev_priv->display.get_backlight = bxt_get_backlight;
> + } else if (IS_BROADWELL(dev) || IS_SKYLAKE(dev)) {
> dev_priv->display.setup_backlight = bdw_setup_backlight;
> dev_priv->display.enable_backlight = bdw_enable_backlight;
> dev_priv->display.disable_backlight = pch_disable_backlight;
> --
> 2.0.1
>
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/bxt: BLC implementation
2015-05-05 11:33 ` Jani Nikula
@ 2015-05-06 11:17 ` Daniel Vetter
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vetter @ 2015-05-06 11:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jani Nikula; +Cc: intel-gfx
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 02:33:39PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 05 May 2015, Vandana Kannan <vandana.kannan@intel.com> wrote:
> > Enabling BLC on BXT.
> > Includes register definition, and new functions for BXT.
> >
> > In BXT, there are 2 sets of registers for BLC. Until there is clarity
> > about which set would be effective, set 1 is being used.
> > This would have to be re-visited if there is any change or when 2 LFPs are
> > enabled on BXT.
> >
> > This patch enables brightness change which would be effected by use of
> > hot-keys or sysfs entry.
> >
> > TODO:- BLC implementation will have to re-visited when
> > 1. there is clarity about which set of registers has to be used and when.
> > 2. CDCLK frequency is changed
> >
> > v2: Jani's review comments
> > - Modified comment in i915_reg.h
> > - Renamed register defintions
> > - Removed definition of duty cycle max. Not required now and its not 64-bit.
> >
> > v3:
> > - Rebase on top of VLV/CHV backlight changes, in particuliar
> > bxt_set_backlight() now has a different prototype (Damien)
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>
> Yup.
Queued for -next, thanks for the patch.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/bxt: BLC implementation
2015-05-05 9:21 [PATCH] drm/i915/bxt: BLC implementation Vandana Kannan
2015-05-05 11:33 ` Jani Nikula
@ 2015-05-05 14:30 ` shuang.he
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: shuang.he @ 2015-05-05 14:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: shuang.he, ethan.gao, intel-gfx, vandana.kannan
Tested-By: Intel Graphics QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact: shuang.he@intel.com)
Task id: 6318
-------------------------------------Summary-------------------------------------
Platform Delta drm-intel-nightly Series Applied
PNV 276/276 276/276
ILK 302/302 302/302
SNB 316/316 316/316
IVB 342/342 342/342
BYT 286/286 286/286
BDW 318/318 318/318
-------------------------------------Detailed-------------------------------------
Platform Test drm-intel-nightly Series Applied
Note: You need to pay more attention to line start with '*'
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-05-06 11:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-05-05 9:21 [PATCH] drm/i915/bxt: BLC implementation Vandana Kannan
2015-05-05 11:33 ` Jani Nikula
2015-05-06 11:17 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-05-05 14:30 ` shuang.he
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox