From: "Dixit, Ashutosh" <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
To: "Belgaumkar, Vinay" <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4] drm/i915/slpc: Optmize waitboost for SLPC
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2022 12:22:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tu3vpste.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <102c7cfd-c7b0-48b4-8fa6-7719f5529783@intel.com>
On Sat, 22 Oct 2022 10:56:03 -0700, Belgaumkar, Vinay wrote:
>
Hi Vinay,
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
> >> index fc23c562d9b2..32e1f5dde5bb 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
> >> @@ -1016,9 +1016,15 @@ void intel_rps_boost(struct i915_request *rq)
> >> if (rps_uses_slpc(rps)) {
> >> slpc = rps_to_slpc(rps);
> >>
> >> + if (slpc->min_freq_softlimit == slpc->boost_freq)
> >> + return;
> > nit but is it possible that 'slpc->min_freq_softlimit > slpc->boost_freq'
> > (looks possible to me from the code though we might not have intended it)?
> > Then we can change this to:
> >
> > if (slpc->min_freq_softlimit >= slpc->boost_freq)
> > return;
Any comment about this? It looks clearly possible to me from the code.
So with the above change this is:
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-22 19:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-22 0:24 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4] drm/i915/slpc: Optmize waitboost for SLPC Vinay Belgaumkar
2022-10-22 0:57 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/slpc: Optmize waitboost for SLPC (rev4) Patchwork
2022-10-22 1:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-10-22 2:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4] drm/i915/slpc: Optmize waitboost for SLPC Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-10-22 17:56 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2022-10-22 19:22 ` Dixit, Ashutosh [this message]
2022-10-24 16:17 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2022-10-22 22:33 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/slpc: Optmize waitboost for SLPC (rev4) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87tu3vpste.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--to=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox