* Re: v3.14-rc7: Backlight control broken on Dell XPS13
[not found] <87eh213q70.fsf@kima.orebokech.com>
@ 2014-03-17 13:44 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-03-17 14:05 ` Romain Francoise
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vetter @ 2014-03-17 13:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Romain Francoise; +Cc: Jani Nikula, intel-gfx
Please never just send a mail to maintainers, always cc mailing lists.
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Romain Francoise <romain@orebokech.com> wrote:
> Moving from v3.13 to v3.14-rc7 breaks backlight control on my Dell
> XPS13, which I assume is because of this change:
>
> http://git.kernel.org/linus/bc0bb9fd1c7810407ab810d204bbaecb255fddde
>
> Is this right? Is backlight supposed to work correctly without the quirk
> now?
Yeah, it should work without the quirk. Have you tested with the patch
reverted to confirm that it's indeed this commit and not something
else (e.g. in the acpi code)?
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: v3.14-rc7: Backlight control broken on Dell XPS13
2014-03-17 13:44 ` v3.14-rc7: Backlight control broken on Dell XPS13 Daniel Vetter
@ 2014-03-17 14:05 ` Romain Francoise
2014-03-17 15:03 ` Jani Nikula
2014-03-17 16:41 ` Jani Nikula
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Romain Francoise @ 2014-03-17 14:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Vetter; +Cc: Jani Nikula, intel-gfx
Hi Daniel,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> writes:
> Please never just send a mail to maintainers, always cc mailing lists.
Yes, sorry, I sent this privately because it wasn't a fully-formed bug
report; I just wanted Jani to confirm that it wasn't intentionally
broken as of -rc7.
> Have you tested with the patch reverted to confirm that it's indeed
> this commit and not something else (e.g. in the acpi code)?
I hadn't, but I've now reverted the revert and things work again as in
v3.13. So as far as I can tell the quirk is still definitely needed.
Thanks!
-r
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: v3.14-rc7: Backlight control broken on Dell XPS13
2014-03-17 14:05 ` Romain Francoise
@ 2014-03-17 15:03 ` Jani Nikula
2014-03-17 15:42 ` Jani Nikula
2014-03-17 16:41 ` Jani Nikula
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2014-03-17 15:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Romain Francoise, Daniel Vetter; +Cc: intel-gfx
On Mon, 17 Mar 2014, Romain Francoise <romain@orebokech.com> wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> writes:
>
>> Please never just send a mail to maintainers, always cc mailing lists.
>
> Yes, sorry, I sent this privately because it wasn't a fully-formed bug
> report; I just wanted Jani to confirm that it wasn't intentionally
> broken as of -rc7.
>
>> Have you tested with the patch reverted to confirm that it's indeed
>> this commit and not something else (e.g. in the acpi code)?
>
> I hadn't, but I've now reverted the revert and things work again as in
> v3.13. So as far as I can tell the quirk is still definitely needed.
I still don't think having the quirk is the way to go. Let's fix this
properly, shall we?
Please file a new bug on DRM/Intel component at [1]. Please attach
intel_reg_dumper output (tool from intel-gpu-tools [2]) with and without
the revert. Please also attach dmesg with drm.debug=0xe from early boot.
Do you have the snb or ivb model?
BR,
Jani.
[1] https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=DRI
[2] http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools/
>
> Thanks!
> -r
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: v3.14-rc7: Backlight control broken on Dell XPS13
2014-03-17 15:03 ` Jani Nikula
@ 2014-03-17 15:42 ` Jani Nikula
2014-03-17 16:34 ` Romain Francoise
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2014-03-17 15:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Romain Francoise, Daniel Vetter; +Cc: intel-gfx
On Mon, 17 Mar 2014, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Mar 2014, Romain Francoise <romain@orebokech.com> wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> writes:
>>
>>> Please never just send a mail to maintainers, always cc mailing lists.
>>
>> Yes, sorry, I sent this privately because it wasn't a fully-formed bug
>> report; I just wanted Jani to confirm that it wasn't intentionally
>> broken as of -rc7.
>>
>>> Have you tested with the patch reverted to confirm that it's indeed
>>> this commit and not something else (e.g. in the acpi code)?
>>
>> I hadn't, but I've now reverted the revert and things work again as in
>> v3.13. So as far as I can tell the quirk is still definitely needed.
>
> I still don't think having the quirk is the way to go. Let's fix this
> properly, shall we?
>
> Please file a new bug on DRM/Intel component at [1]. Please attach
> intel_reg_dumper output (tool from intel-gpu-tools [2]) with and without
> the revert. Please also attach dmesg with drm.debug=0xe from early boot.
The register dump from *before* i915 gets loaded is also interesting.
BR,
Jani.
>
> Do you have the snb or ivb model?
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
>
> [1] https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=DRI
> [2] http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools/
>
>>
>> Thanks!
>> -r
>
> --
> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: v3.14-rc7: Backlight control broken on Dell XPS13
2014-03-17 15:42 ` Jani Nikula
@ 2014-03-17 16:34 ` Romain Francoise
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Romain Francoise @ 2014-03-17 16:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jani Nikula; +Cc: Daniel Vetter, intel-gfx
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> writes:
> Please file a new bug on DRM/Intel component at [1]. Please attach
> intel_reg_dumper output (tool from intel-gpu-tools [2]) with and without
> the revert. Please also attach dmesg with drm.debug=0xe from early
> boot.
Done, https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76276
Let me know if you need more info.
> Do you have the snb or ivb model?
IVB.
> The register dump from *before* i915 gets loaded is also interesting.
That's more difficult to procure, is it really necessary?
Thanks,
-r
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: v3.14-rc7: Backlight control broken on Dell XPS13
2014-03-17 14:05 ` Romain Francoise
2014-03-17 15:03 ` Jani Nikula
@ 2014-03-17 16:41 ` Jani Nikula
2014-03-17 17:27 ` Romain Francoise
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2014-03-17 16:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Romain Francoise, Daniel Vetter; +Cc: intel-gfx
On Mon, 17 Mar 2014, Romain Francoise <romain@orebokech.com> wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> writes:
>
>> Please never just send a mail to maintainers, always cc mailing lists.
>
> Yes, sorry, I sent this privately because it wasn't a fully-formed bug
> report; I just wanted Jani to confirm that it wasn't intentionally
> broken as of -rc7.
>
>> Have you tested with the patch reverted to confirm that it's indeed
>> this commit and not something else (e.g. in the acpi code)?
>
> I hadn't, but I've now reverted the revert and things work again as in
> v3.13. So as far as I can tell the quirk is still definitely needed.
Here's two patches to try, separately, *without* the quirk:
Patch #1:
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
index cb058408c70e..ef26115dbe68 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
@@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ static void pch_enable_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector)
/* This won't stick until the above enable. */
intel_panel_actually_set_backlight(connector, panel->backlight.level);
- pch_ctl2 = panel->backlight.max << 16;
+ pch_ctl2 = panel->backlight.max << 16 | panel->backlight.level;
I915_WRITE(BLC_PWM_PCH_CTL2, pch_ctl2);
pch_ctl1 = 0;
Patch #2:
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
index cb058408c70e..10849104fa1e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
@@ -669,6 +669,8 @@ static void pch_enable_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector)
I915_WRITE(BLC_PWM_PCH_CTL1, pch_ctl1);
POSTING_READ(BLC_PWM_PCH_CTL1);
I915_WRITE(BLC_PWM_PCH_CTL1, pch_ctl1 | BLM_PCH_PWM_ENABLE);
+
+ intel_panel_actually_set_backlight(connector, panel->backlight.level);
}
static void i9xx_enable_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector)
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: v3.14-rc7: Backlight control broken on Dell XPS13
2014-03-17 16:41 ` Jani Nikula
@ 2014-03-17 17:27 ` Romain Francoise
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Romain Francoise @ 2014-03-17 17:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jani Nikula; +Cc: Daniel Vetter, intel-gfx
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> writes:
> Here's two patches to try, separately, *without* the quirk: [...]
Okay, I've tried both and neither works. However, I've noticed that
while the backlight level never changes even though I'm changing it with
Fn+F4/Fn+F5, it *does* get registered somewhere because if I bring it
all the day down and reboot, the brightness is reduced in the next BIOS
POST (loading i915 gets it back to 100%).
Thanks,
-r
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-03-17 17:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <87eh213q70.fsf@kima.orebokech.com>
2014-03-17 13:44 ` v3.14-rc7: Backlight control broken on Dell XPS13 Daniel Vetter
2014-03-17 14:05 ` Romain Francoise
2014-03-17 15:03 ` Jani Nikula
2014-03-17 15:42 ` Jani Nikula
2014-03-17 16:34 ` Romain Francoise
2014-03-17 16:41 ` Jani Nikula
2014-03-17 17:27 ` Romain Francoise
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox