From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B4C3C433FE for ; Thu, 26 May 2022 08:21:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE1F210F5FB; Thu, 26 May 2022 08:21:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0A3810F56C for ; Thu, 26 May 2022 08:21:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1653553313; x=1685089313; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to: references:mime-version; bh=SwrfCslnydx6lsKYQVq0vaFIwyg8AoKosLsGE2HkmyY=; b=Iwqe0UWvafXW1Pxa/o2pfyvDK3NdFzfcc3qEvgA5SJpGmoM/UIyK8wHc RGK1t/lwPAriI61AcLOKX06Jdqc+dS/uFpgjNP2z0ON7nLUi/rTKW6vKD 3LWUjiXbW3gpAs0zUjNyJtTeLC5X6I1ACIbrissr1U7sTHIxAqObzWxVW U6ZgfpjmUjNhc2hyjjKDPDoDWwqbK0I6Z8wOVgbDC9sPLi22UoE8c21Bv 5C14Ntj2lfkmMNDHxZiEcxfGhL38npDOS8KreLfAOHXwWeK5lKFUDCUdz j58rjwPLMPa2rJ3JPJDHvtIbqsTxEpt36jdJADx033Sje4s3ZixjtHyRZ w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6400,9594,10358"; a="299416597" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.91,252,1647327600"; d="scan'208";a="299416597" Received: from fmsmga008.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.58]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 May 2022 01:21:53 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.91,252,1647327600"; d="scan'208";a="630783156" Received: from adixit-mobl1.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO adixit-arch.intel.com) ([10.212.199.107]) by fmsmga008-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 May 2022 01:21:53 -0700 Date: Thu, 26 May 2022 01:12:27 -0700 Message-ID: <87v8ts7lw4.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> From: "Dixit, Ashutosh" To: Tvrtko Ursulin In-Reply-To: <877d6ahvkd.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> References: <877d6ahvkd.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM-LB/1.14.9 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Goj=F2?=) APEL-LB/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/28.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 0/7] drm/i915: Media freq factor and per-gt enhancements/fixes X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" On Wed, 25 May 2022 01:21:06 -0700, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote: > > On Mon, 23 May 2022 01:57:51 -0700, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > > > On 13/05/2022 02:36, Ashutosh Dixit wrote: > > > Some recent Intel dGfx platforms allow media IP to work at a different > > > frequency from the base GT. This patch series exposes sysfs controls for > > > this functionality in the new per-gt sysfs. Some enhancements and fixes to > > > previous per-gt functionality are also included to complete the new > > > functionality: > > > * Patches 1 and 2 implement basic sysfs controls for media freq > > > * Patch 3 extends previous pcode functions for multiple gt's > > > * Patch 4 inits pcode on different gt's > > > * Patch 5 adds a couple of pcode helpers > > > * Patch 6 uses the new pcode functions to retrieve media RP0/RPn freq > > > * Patch 7 fixes memory leaks in the previous per-gt sysfs implementation > > > and some code refactoring > > > > Patches 1, 3 and 5 have been merged to drm-intel-next, and then branch > > cross-merged into drm-intel-gt-next. > > > > You can try re-sending the rest of the series now and see if that goes > > smoothly. > > I sent the patches out Mon but am struggling to get a satisfactory CI run > from what it looks like are CI issues (CI runs were fine on previous > versions). Will update after we have successful CI. Thanks. Hi Tvrtko, We now have CI results. They look good to me (except that there is a false positive). In case you think this is good enough to merge these patches now: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/102665/#rev10 Thanks. -- Ashutosh