intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] drm/i915/execlists: Ignore lost completion events
@ 2019-08-31  8:25 Chris Wilson
  2019-08-31  8:37 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2019-08-31  8:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx

Icelake hit an issue where it missed reporting a completion event and
instead jumped straight to a idle->active event (skipping over the
active->idle and not even hitting the lite-restore preemption).

661497511us : process_csb: rcs0 cs-irq head=11, tail=0
661497512us : process_csb: rcs0 csb[0]: status=0x10008002:0x00000020 [lite-restore]
661497512us : trace_ports: rcs0: preempted { 28cc8:11052, 0:0 }
661497513us : trace_ports: rcs0: promote { 28cc8:11054, 0:0 }
661497514us : __i915_request_submit: rcs0 fence 28cc8:11056, current 11052
661497514us : __execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0: queue_priority_hint:-2147483648, submit:yes
661497515us : trace_ports: rcs0: submit { 28cc8:11056, 0:0 }
661497530us : process_csb: rcs0 cs-irq head=0, tail=1
661497530us : process_csb: rcs0 csb[1]: status=0x10008002:0x00000020 [lite-restore]
661497531us : trace_ports: rcs0: preempted { 28cc8:11054!, 0:0 }
661497535us : trace_ports: rcs0: promote { 28cc8:11056, 0:0 }
661497540us : __i915_request_submit: rcs0 fence 28cc8:11058, current 11054
661497544us : __execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0: queue_priority_hint:-2147483648, submit:yes
661497545us : trace_ports: rcs0: submit { 28cc8:11058, 0:0 }
661497553us : process_csb: rcs0 cs-irq head=1, tail=2
661497553us : process_csb: rcs0 csb[2]: status=0x10000001:0x00000000 [idle->active]
661497574us : process_csb: process_csb:1538 GEM_BUG_ON(*execlists->active)

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c | 63 +++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
index 0e28263c7b87..9d50fd3b896c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
@@ -693,6 +693,9 @@ trace_ports(const struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists,
 	const struct intel_engine_cs *engine =
 		container_of(execlists, typeof(*engine), execlists);
 
+	if (!ports[0])
+		return;
+
 	GEM_TRACE("%s: %s { %llx:%lld%s, %llx:%lld }\n",
 		  engine->name, msg,
 		  ports[0]->fence.context,
@@ -1371,13 +1374,6 @@ reset_in_progress(const struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists)
 	return unlikely(!__tasklet_is_enabled(&execlists->tasklet));
 }
 
-enum csb_step {
-	CSB_NOP,
-	CSB_PROMOTE,
-	CSB_PREEMPT,
-	CSB_COMPLETE,
-};
-
 /*
  * Starting with Gen12, the status has a new format:
  *
@@ -1404,7 +1400,7 @@ enum csb_step {
  *     bits 47-57: sw context id of the lrc the GT switched away from
  *     bits 58-63: sw counter of the lrc the GT switched away from
  */
-static inline enum csb_step
+static inline bool
 gen12_csb_parse(const struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists, const u32 *csb)
 {
 	u32 lower_dw = csb[0];
@@ -1414,7 +1410,7 @@ gen12_csb_parse(const struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists, const u32 *csb)
 	bool new_queue = lower_dw & GEN12_CTX_STATUS_SWITCHED_TO_NEW_QUEUE;
 
 	if (!ctx_away_valid && ctx_to_valid)
-		return CSB_PROMOTE;
+		return true;
 
 	/*
 	 * The context switch detail is not guaranteed to be 5 when a preemption
@@ -1424,7 +1420,7 @@ gen12_csb_parse(const struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists, const u32 *csb)
 	 * would require some extra handling, but we don't support that.
 	 */
 	if (new_queue && ctx_away_valid)
-		return CSB_PREEMPT;
+		return true;
 
 	/*
 	 * switch detail = 5 is covered by the case above and we do not expect a
@@ -1433,29 +1429,13 @@ gen12_csb_parse(const struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists, const u32 *csb)
 	 */
 	GEM_BUG_ON(GEN12_CTX_SWITCH_DETAIL(upper_dw));
 
-	if (*execlists->active) {
-		GEM_BUG_ON(!ctx_away_valid);
-		return CSB_COMPLETE;
-	}
-
-	return CSB_NOP;
+	return false;
 }
 
-static inline enum csb_step
+static inline bool
 gen8_csb_parse(const struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists, const u32 *csb)
 {
-	unsigned int status = *csb;
-
-	if (status & GEN8_CTX_STATUS_IDLE_ACTIVE)
-		return CSB_PROMOTE;
-
-	if (status & GEN8_CTX_STATUS_PREEMPTED)
-		return CSB_PREEMPT;
-
-	if (*execlists->active)
-		return CSB_COMPLETE;
-
-	return CSB_NOP;
+	return *csb & (GEN8_CTX_STATUS_IDLE_ACTIVE | GEN8_CTX_STATUS_PREEMPTED);
 }
 
 static void process_csb(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
@@ -1494,7 +1474,7 @@ static void process_csb(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 	rmb();
 
 	do {
-		enum csb_step csb_step;
+		bool promote;
 
 		if (++head == num_entries)
 			head = 0;
@@ -1522,20 +1502,16 @@ static void process_csb(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 			  buf[2 * head + 0], buf[2 * head + 1]);
 
 		if (INTEL_GEN(engine->i915) >= 12)
-			csb_step = gen12_csb_parse(execlists, buf + 2 * head);
+			promote = gen12_csb_parse(execlists, buf + 2 * head);
 		else
-			csb_step = gen8_csb_parse(execlists, buf + 2 * head);
-
-		switch (csb_step) {
-		case CSB_PREEMPT: /* cancel old inflight, prepare for switch */
+			promote = gen8_csb_parse(execlists, buf + 2 * head);
+		if (promote) {
+			/* cancel old inflight, prepare for switch */
 			trace_ports(execlists, "preempted", execlists->active);
-
 			while (*execlists->active)
 				execlists_schedule_out(*execlists->active++);
 
-			/* fallthrough */
-		case CSB_PROMOTE: /* switch pending to inflight */
-			GEM_BUG_ON(*execlists->active);
+			/* switch pending to inflight */
 			GEM_BUG_ON(!assert_pending_valid(execlists, "promote"));
 			execlists->active =
 				memcpy(execlists->inflight,
@@ -1550,9 +1526,10 @@ static void process_csb(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 				ring_set_paused(engine, 0);
 
 			WRITE_ONCE(execlists->pending[0], NULL);
-			break;
+		} else {
+			GEM_BUG_ON(!*execlists->active);
 
-		case CSB_COMPLETE: /* port0 completed, advanced to port1 */
+			/* port0 completed, advanced to port1 */
 			trace_ports(execlists, "completed", execlists->active);
 
 			/*
@@ -1567,10 +1544,6 @@ static void process_csb(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 
 			GEM_BUG_ON(execlists->active - execlists->inflight >
 				   execlists_num_ports(execlists));
-			break;
-
-		case CSB_NOP:
-			break;
 		}
 	} while (head != tail);
 
-- 
2.23.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/execlists: Ignore lost completion events
  2019-08-31  8:25 [PATCH] drm/i915/execlists: Ignore lost completion events Chris Wilson
@ 2019-08-31  8:37 ` Patchwork
  2019-08-31  9:05 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2019-08-31  8:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chris Wilson; +Cc: intel-gfx

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915/execlists: Ignore lost completion events
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/66084/
State : warning

== Summary ==

$ dim checkpatch origin/drm-tip
99fb5a9a9d29 drm/i915/execlists: Ignore lost completion events
-:11: WARNING:COMMIT_LOG_LONG_LINE: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75 chars per line)
#11: 
661497512us : process_csb: rcs0 csb[0]: status=0x10008002:0x00000020 [lite-restore]

total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 checks, 133 lines checked

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/execlists: Ignore lost completion events
  2019-08-31  8:25 [PATCH] drm/i915/execlists: Ignore lost completion events Chris Wilson
  2019-08-31  8:37 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
@ 2019-08-31  9:05 ` Patchwork
  2019-09-01  5:18 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
  2019-09-04  7:16 ` [PATCH] " Mika Kuoppala
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2019-08-31  9:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chris Wilson; +Cc: intel-gfx

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915/execlists: Ignore lost completion events
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/66084/
State : success

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_6814 -> Patchwork_14249
====================================================

Summary
-------

  **SUCCESS**

  No regressions found.

  External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14249/

Known issues
------------

  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_14249 that come from known issues:

### IGT changes ###

#### Issues hit ####

  * igt@i915_selftest@live_mman:
    - fi-bsw-kefka:       [PASS][1] -> [DMESG-WARN][2] ([fdo#111373])
   [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6814/fi-bsw-kefka/igt@i915_selftest@live_mman.html
   [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14249/fi-bsw-kefka/igt@i915_selftest@live_mman.html

  * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@basic:
    - fi-icl-u2:          [PASS][3] -> [FAIL][4] ([fdo#103167])
   [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6814/fi-icl-u2/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@basic.html
   [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14249/fi-icl-u2/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@basic.html

  
#### Possible fixes ####

  * igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-cpu-active:
    - {fi-kbl-soraka}:    [DMESG-WARN][5] ([fdo#106107]) -> [PASS][6]
   [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6814/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-cpu-active.html
   [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14249/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-cpu-active.html

  
#### Warnings ####

  * igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast:
    - fi-kbl-7500u:       [FAIL][7] ([fdo#111407]) -> [FAIL][8] ([fdo#111096])
   [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6814/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast.html
   [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14249/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast.html

  
  {name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
          the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).

  [fdo#103167]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103167
  [fdo#106107]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106107
  [fdo#111096]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111096
  [fdo#111373]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111373
  [fdo#111407]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111407


Participating hosts (52 -> 44)
------------------------------

  Missing    (8): fi-ilk-m540 fi-hsw-4200u fi-byt-squawks fi-bsw-cyan fi-icl-y fi-byt-n2820 fi-byt-clapper fi-bdw-samus 


Build changes
-------------

  * CI: CI-20190529 -> None
  * Linux: CI_DRM_6814 -> Patchwork_14249

  CI-20190529: 20190529
  CI_DRM_6814: 36fe82b28ff02470a9b3a8f7861cf4bc0f44df56 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  IGT_5162: e62ea305fdba2a9cd0dadfa527b54529cb0d1438 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
  Patchwork_14249: 99fb5a9a9d2946553c82dbcd63dc0ed2605f6fbc @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux


== Linux commits ==

99fb5a9a9d29 drm/i915/execlists: Ignore lost completion events

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14249/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915/execlists: Ignore lost completion events
  2019-08-31  8:25 [PATCH] drm/i915/execlists: Ignore lost completion events Chris Wilson
  2019-08-31  8:37 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
  2019-08-31  9:05 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
@ 2019-09-01  5:18 ` Patchwork
  2019-09-04  7:16 ` [PATCH] " Mika Kuoppala
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2019-09-01  5:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chris Wilson; +Cc: intel-gfx

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915/execlists: Ignore lost completion events
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/66084/
State : success

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_6814_full -> Patchwork_14249_full
====================================================

Summary
-------

  **SUCCESS**

  No regressions found.

  

Known issues
------------

  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_14249_full that come from known issues:

### IGT changes ###

#### Issues hit ####

  * igt@debugfs_test@read_all_entries:
    - shard-skl:          [PASS][1] -> [INCOMPLETE][2] ([fdo#108901])
   [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6814/shard-skl4/igt@debugfs_test@read_all_entries.html
   [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14249/shard-skl2/igt@debugfs_test@read_all_entries.html

  * igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-other-chain-bsd:
    - shard-iclb:         [PASS][3] -> [SKIP][4] ([fdo#111325]) +6 similar issues
   [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6814/shard-iclb5/igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-other-chain-bsd.html
   [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14249/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-other-chain-bsd.html

  * igt@gem_workarounds@suspend-resume-context:
    - shard-apl:          [PASS][5] -> [DMESG-WARN][6] ([fdo#108566]) +6 similar issues
   [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6814/shard-apl5/igt@gem_workarounds@suspend-resume-context.html
   [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14249/shard-apl1/igt@gem_workarounds@suspend-resume-context.html

  * igt@i915_pm_rps@reset:
    - shard-skl:          [PASS][7] -> [FAIL][8] ([fdo#102250])
   [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6814/shard-skl10/igt@i915_pm_rps@reset.html
   [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14249/shard-skl10/igt@i915_pm_rps@reset.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-b-cursor-suspend:
    - shard-skl:          [PASS][9] -> [INCOMPLETE][10] ([fdo#110741])
   [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6814/shard-skl10/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-b-cursor-suspend.html
   [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14249/shard-skl10/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-b-cursor-suspend.html

  * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-1p-primscrn-pri-indfb-draw-pwrite:
    - shard-iclb:         [PASS][11] -> [FAIL][12] ([fdo#103167]) +1 similar issue
   [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6814/shard-iclb8/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-1p-primscrn-pri-indfb-draw-pwrite.html
   [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14249/shard-iclb4/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-1p-primscrn-pri-indfb-draw-pwrite.html

  * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-rgb565-draw-blt:
    - shard-iclb:         [PASS][13] -> [INCOMPLETE][14] ([fdo#106978] / [fdo#107713])
   [13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6814/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-rgb565-draw-blt.html
   [14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14249/shard-iclb7/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-rgb565-draw-blt.html

  * igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-b-coverage-7efc:
    - shard-skl:          [PASS][15] -> [FAIL][16] ([fdo#108145] / [fdo#110403])
   [15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6814/shard-skl9/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-b-coverage-7efc.html
   [16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14249/shard-skl3/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-b-coverage-7efc.html

  * igt@kms_psr@psr2_cursor_mmap_gtt:
    - shard-iclb:         [PASS][17] -> [SKIP][18] ([fdo#109441])
   [17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6814/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr@psr2_cursor_mmap_gtt.html
   [18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14249/shard-iclb3/igt@kms_psr@psr2_cursor_mmap_gtt.html

  * igt@kms_vblank@pipe-a-query-busy:
    - shard-snb:          [PASS][19] -> [SKIP][20] ([fdo#109271]) +5 similar issues
   [19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6814/shard-snb4/igt@kms_vblank@pipe-a-query-busy.html
   [20]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14249/shard-snb7/igt@kms_vblank@pipe-a-query-busy.html

  * igt@perf@blocking:
    - shard-skl:          [PASS][21] -> [FAIL][22] ([fdo#110728])
   [21]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6814/shard-skl1/igt@perf@blocking.html
   [22]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14249/shard-skl1/igt@perf@blocking.html

  * igt@perf@oa-exponents:
    - shard-glk:          [PASS][23] -> [FAIL][24] ([fdo#105483])
   [23]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6814/shard-glk4/igt@perf@oa-exponents.html
   [24]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14249/shard-glk7/igt@perf@oa-exponents.html

  * igt@prime_busy@after-bsd2:
    - shard-iclb:         [PASS][25] -> [SKIP][26] ([fdo#109276]) +17 similar issues
   [25]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6814/shard-iclb1/igt@prime_busy@after-bsd2.html
   [26]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14249/shard-iclb8/igt@prime_busy@after-bsd2.html

  
#### Possible fixes ####

  * igt@gem_ctx_shared@exec-single-timeline-bsd:
    - shard-iclb:         [SKIP][27] ([fdo#110841]) -> [PASS][28]
   [27]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6814/shard-iclb1/igt@gem_ctx_shared@exec-single-timeline-bsd.html
   [28]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14249/shard-iclb8/igt@gem_ctx_shared@exec-single-timeline-bsd.html

  * igt@gem_exec_schedule@independent-bsd2:
    - shard-iclb:         [SKIP][29] ([fdo#109276]) -> [PASS][30] +21 similar issues
   [29]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6814/shard-iclb5/igt@gem_exec_schedule@independent-bsd2.html
   [30]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14249/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_exec_schedule@independent-bsd2.html

  * igt@gem_exec_schedule@preemptive-hang-bsd:
    - shard-iclb:         [SKIP][31] ([fdo#111325]) -> [PASS][32] +4 similar issues
   [31]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6814/shard-iclb1/igt@gem_exec_schedule@preemptive-hang-bsd.html
   [32]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14249/shard-iclb8/igt@gem_exec_schedule@preemptive-hang-bsd.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_edge_walk@pipe-a-64x64-top-edge:
    - shard-apl:          [INCOMPLETE][33] ([fdo#103927]) -> [PASS][34] +2 similar issues
   [33]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6814/shard-apl6/igt@kms_cursor_edge_walk@pipe-a-64x64-top-edge.html
   [34]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14249/shard-apl3/igt@kms_cursor_edge_walk@pipe-a-64x64-top-edge.html

  * igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend:
    - shard-hsw:          [INCOMPLETE][35] ([fdo#103540]) -> [PASS][36]
   [35]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6814/shard-hsw4/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend.html
   [36]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14249/shard-hsw6/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend.html

  * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-1p-primscrn-spr-indfb-draw-blt:
    - shard-iclb:         [FAIL][37] ([fdo#103167]) -> [PASS][38] +3 similar issues
   [37]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6814/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-1p-primscrn-spr-indfb-draw-blt.html
   [38]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14249/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-1p-primscrn-spr-indfb-draw-blt.html

  * igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-b-constant-alpha-min:
    - shard-skl:          [FAIL][39] ([fdo#108145]) -> [PASS][40]
   [39]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6814/shard-skl8/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-b-constant-alpha-min.html
   [40]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14249/shard-skl4/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-b-constant-alpha-min.html

  * igt@kms_psr@psr2_primary_mmap_cpu:
    - shard-iclb:         [SKIP][41] ([fdo#109441]) -> [PASS][42] +2 similar issues
   [41]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6814/shard-iclb3/igt@kms_psr@psr2_primary_mmap_cpu.html
   [42]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14249/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr@psr2_primary_mmap_cpu.html

  * igt@kms_vblank@pipe-c-ts-continuation-suspend:
    - shard-apl:          [DMESG-WARN][43] ([fdo#108566]) -> [PASS][44] +2 similar issues
   [43]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6814/shard-apl1/igt@kms_vblank@pipe-c-ts-continuation-suspend.html
   [44]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14249/shard-apl7/igt@kms_vblank@pipe-c-ts-continuation-suspend.html

  * igt@perf@polling:
    - shard-skl:          [FAIL][45] ([fdo#110728]) -> [PASS][46]
   [45]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6814/shard-skl1/igt@perf@polling.html
   [46]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14249/shard-skl8/igt@perf@polling.html

  
  [fdo#102250]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102250
  [fdo#103167]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103167
  [fdo#103540]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103540
  [fdo#103927]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103927
  [fdo#105483]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105483
  [fdo#106978]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106978
  [fdo#107713]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107713
  [fdo#108145]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108145
  [fdo#108566]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108566
  [fdo#108901]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108901
  [fdo#109271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109271
  [fdo#109276]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109276
  [fdo#109441]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109441
  [fdo#110403]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110403
  [fdo#110728]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110728
  [fdo#110741]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110741
  [fdo#110841]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110841
  [fdo#111325]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111325


Participating hosts (10 -> 10)
------------------------------

  No changes in participating hosts


Build changes
-------------

  * CI: CI-20190529 -> None
  * Linux: CI_DRM_6814 -> Patchwork_14249

  CI-20190529: 20190529
  CI_DRM_6814: 36fe82b28ff02470a9b3a8f7861cf4bc0f44df56 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  IGT_5162: e62ea305fdba2a9cd0dadfa527b54529cb0d1438 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
  Patchwork_14249: 99fb5a9a9d2946553c82dbcd63dc0ed2605f6fbc @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  piglit_4509: fdc5a4ca11124ab8413c7988896eec4c97336694 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/piglit

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14249/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/execlists: Ignore lost completion events
  2019-08-31  8:25 [PATCH] drm/i915/execlists: Ignore lost completion events Chris Wilson
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2019-09-01  5:18 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
@ 2019-09-04  7:16 ` Mika Kuoppala
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Mika Kuoppala @ 2019-09-04  7:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chris Wilson, intel-gfx

Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:

> Icelake hit an issue where it missed reporting a completion event and
> instead jumped straight to a idle->active event (skipping over the
> active->idle and not even hitting the lite-restore preemption).
>
> 661497511us : process_csb: rcs0 cs-irq head=11, tail=0
> 661497512us : process_csb: rcs0 csb[0]: status=0x10008002:0x00000020 [lite-restore]
> 661497512us : trace_ports: rcs0: preempted { 28cc8:11052, 0:0 }
> 661497513us : trace_ports: rcs0: promote { 28cc8:11054, 0:0 }
> 661497514us : __i915_request_submit: rcs0 fence 28cc8:11056, current 11052
> 661497514us : __execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0: queue_priority_hint:-2147483648, submit:yes
> 661497515us : trace_ports: rcs0: submit { 28cc8:11056, 0:0 }
> 661497530us : process_csb: rcs0 cs-irq head=0, tail=1
> 661497530us : process_csb: rcs0 csb[1]: status=0x10008002:0x00000020 [lite-restore]
> 661497531us : trace_ports: rcs0: preempted { 28cc8:11054!, 0:0 }
> 661497535us : trace_ports: rcs0: promote { 28cc8:11056, 0:0 }
> 661497540us : __i915_request_submit: rcs0 fence 28cc8:11058, current 11054
> 661497544us : __execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0: queue_priority_hint:-2147483648, submit:yes
> 661497545us : trace_ports: rcs0: submit { 28cc8:11058, 0:0 }
> 661497553us : process_csb: rcs0 cs-irq head=1, tail=2
> 661497553us : process_csb: rcs0 csb[2]: status=0x10000001:0x00000000 [idle->active]
> 661497574us : process_csb: process_csb:1538 GEM_BUG_ON(*execlists->active)
>

In CI? (ref)

> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c | 63 +++++++++--------------------
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
> index 0e28263c7b87..9d50fd3b896c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
> @@ -693,6 +693,9 @@ trace_ports(const struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists,
>  	const struct intel_engine_cs *engine =
>  		container_of(execlists, typeof(*engine), execlists);
>  
> +	if (!ports[0])
> +		return;
> +
>  	GEM_TRACE("%s: %s { %llx:%lld%s, %llx:%lld }\n",
>  		  engine->name, msg,
>  		  ports[0]->fence.context,
> @@ -1371,13 +1374,6 @@ reset_in_progress(const struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists)
>  	return unlikely(!__tasklet_is_enabled(&execlists->tasklet));
>  }
>  
> -enum csb_step {
> -	CSB_NOP,
> -	CSB_PROMOTE,
> -	CSB_PREEMPT,
> -	CSB_COMPLETE,
> -};
> -
>  /*
>   * Starting with Gen12, the status has a new format:
>   *
> @@ -1404,7 +1400,7 @@ enum csb_step {
>   *     bits 47-57: sw context id of the lrc the GT switched away from
>   *     bits 58-63: sw counter of the lrc the GT switched away from
>   */
> -static inline enum csb_step
> +static inline bool
>  gen12_csb_parse(const struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists, const u32 *csb)

should it be gen11_should_promote now?
-Mika

>  {
>  	u32 lower_dw = csb[0];
> @@ -1414,7 +1410,7 @@ gen12_csb_parse(const struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists, const u32 *csb)
>  	bool new_queue = lower_dw & GEN12_CTX_STATUS_SWITCHED_TO_NEW_QUEUE;
>  
>  	if (!ctx_away_valid && ctx_to_valid)
> -		return CSB_PROMOTE;
> +		return true;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * The context switch detail is not guaranteed to be 5 when a preemption
> @@ -1424,7 +1420,7 @@ gen12_csb_parse(const struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists, const u32 *csb)
>  	 * would require some extra handling, but we don't support that.
>  	 */
>  	if (new_queue && ctx_away_valid)
> -		return CSB_PREEMPT;
> +		return true;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * switch detail = 5 is covered by the case above and we do not expect a
> @@ -1433,29 +1429,13 @@ gen12_csb_parse(const struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists, const u32 *csb)
>  	 */
>  	GEM_BUG_ON(GEN12_CTX_SWITCH_DETAIL(upper_dw));
>  
> -	if (*execlists->active) {
> -		GEM_BUG_ON(!ctx_away_valid);
> -		return CSB_COMPLETE;
> -	}
> -
> -	return CSB_NOP;
> +	return false;
>  }
>  
> -static inline enum csb_step
> +static inline bool
>  gen8_csb_parse(const struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists, const u32 *csb)
>  {
> -	unsigned int status = *csb;
> -
> -	if (status & GEN8_CTX_STATUS_IDLE_ACTIVE)
> -		return CSB_PROMOTE;
> -
> -	if (status & GEN8_CTX_STATUS_PREEMPTED)
> -		return CSB_PREEMPT;
> -
> -	if (*execlists->active)
> -		return CSB_COMPLETE;
> -
> -	return CSB_NOP;
> +	return *csb & (GEN8_CTX_STATUS_IDLE_ACTIVE | GEN8_CTX_STATUS_PREEMPTED);
>  }
>  
>  static void process_csb(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> @@ -1494,7 +1474,7 @@ static void process_csb(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>  	rmb();
>  
>  	do {
> -		enum csb_step csb_step;
> +		bool promote;
>  
>  		if (++head == num_entries)
>  			head = 0;
> @@ -1522,20 +1502,16 @@ static void process_csb(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>  			  buf[2 * head + 0], buf[2 * head + 1]);
>  
>  		if (INTEL_GEN(engine->i915) >= 12)
> -			csb_step = gen12_csb_parse(execlists, buf + 2 * head);
> +			promote = gen12_csb_parse(execlists, buf + 2 * head);
>  		else
> -			csb_step = gen8_csb_parse(execlists, buf + 2 * head);
> -
> -		switch (csb_step) {
> -		case CSB_PREEMPT: /* cancel old inflight, prepare for switch */
> +			promote = gen8_csb_parse(execlists, buf + 2 * head);
> +		if (promote) {
> +			/* cancel old inflight, prepare for switch */
>  			trace_ports(execlists, "preempted", execlists->active);
> -
>  			while (*execlists->active)
>  				execlists_schedule_out(*execlists->active++);
>  
> -			/* fallthrough */
> -		case CSB_PROMOTE: /* switch pending to inflight */
> -			GEM_BUG_ON(*execlists->active);
> +			/* switch pending to inflight */
>  			GEM_BUG_ON(!assert_pending_valid(execlists, "promote"));
>  			execlists->active =
>  				memcpy(execlists->inflight,
> @@ -1550,9 +1526,10 @@ static void process_csb(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>  				ring_set_paused(engine, 0);
>  
>  			WRITE_ONCE(execlists->pending[0], NULL);
> -			break;
> +		} else {
> +			GEM_BUG_ON(!*execlists->active);
>  
> -		case CSB_COMPLETE: /* port0 completed, advanced to port1 */
> +			/* port0 completed, advanced to port1 */
>  			trace_ports(execlists, "completed", execlists->active);
>  
>  			/*
> @@ -1567,10 +1544,6 @@ static void process_csb(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>  
>  			GEM_BUG_ON(execlists->active - execlists->inflight >
>  				   execlists_num_ports(execlists));
> -			break;
> -
> -		case CSB_NOP:
> -			break;
>  		}
>  	} while (head != tail);
>  
> -- 
> 2.23.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] drm/i915/execlists: Ignore lost completion events
@ 2019-09-07  8:43 Chris Wilson
  2019-09-10 10:17 ` Mika Kuoppala
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2019-09-07  8:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx

Icelake hit an issue where it missed reporting a completion event and
instead jumped straight to a idle->active event (skipping over the
active->idle and not even hitting the lite-restore preemption).

661497511us : process_csb: rcs0 cs-irq head=11, tail=0
661497512us : process_csb: rcs0 csb[0]: status=0x10008002:0x00000020 [lite-restore]
661497512us : trace_ports: rcs0: preempted { 28cc8:11052, 0:0 }
661497513us : trace_ports: rcs0: promote { 28cc8:11054, 0:0 }
661497514us : __i915_request_submit: rcs0 fence 28cc8:11056, current 11052
661497514us : __execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0: queue_priority_hint:-2147483648, submit:yes
661497515us : trace_ports: rcs0: submit { 28cc8:11056, 0:0 }
661497530us : process_csb: rcs0 cs-irq head=0, tail=1
661497530us : process_csb: rcs0 csb[1]: status=0x10008002:0x00000020 [lite-restore]
661497531us : trace_ports: rcs0: preempted { 28cc8:11054!, 0:0 }
661497535us : trace_ports: rcs0: promote { 28cc8:11056, 0:0 }
661497540us : __i915_request_submit: rcs0 fence 28cc8:11058, current 11054
661497544us : __execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0: queue_priority_hint:-2147483648, submit:yes
661497545us : trace_ports: rcs0: submit { 28cc8:11058, 0:0 }
661497553us : process_csb: rcs0 cs-irq head=1, tail=2
661497553us : process_csb: rcs0 csb[2]: status=0x10000001:0x00000000 [idle->active]
661497574us : process_csb: process_csb:1538 GEM_BUG_ON(*execlists->active)

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c | 63 +++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
index 0ddfbebbcbbc..3aad35b570d4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
@@ -693,6 +693,9 @@ trace_ports(const struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists,
 	const struct intel_engine_cs *engine =
 		container_of(execlists, typeof(*engine), execlists);
 
+	if (!ports[0])
+		return;
+
 	GEM_TRACE("%s: %s { %llx:%lld%s, %llx:%lld }\n",
 		  engine->name, msg,
 		  ports[0]->fence.context,
@@ -1381,13 +1384,6 @@ reset_in_progress(const struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists)
 	return unlikely(!__tasklet_is_enabled(&execlists->tasklet));
 }
 
-enum csb_step {
-	CSB_NOP,
-	CSB_PROMOTE,
-	CSB_PREEMPT,
-	CSB_COMPLETE,
-};
-
 /*
  * Starting with Gen12, the status has a new format:
  *
@@ -1414,7 +1410,7 @@ enum csb_step {
  *     bits 47-57: sw context id of the lrc the GT switched away from
  *     bits 58-63: sw counter of the lrc the GT switched away from
  */
-static inline enum csb_step
+static inline bool
 gen12_csb_parse(const struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists, const u32 *csb)
 {
 	u32 lower_dw = csb[0];
@@ -1424,7 +1420,7 @@ gen12_csb_parse(const struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists, const u32 *csb)
 	bool new_queue = lower_dw & GEN12_CTX_STATUS_SWITCHED_TO_NEW_QUEUE;
 
 	if (!ctx_away_valid && ctx_to_valid)
-		return CSB_PROMOTE;
+		return true;
 
 	/*
 	 * The context switch detail is not guaranteed to be 5 when a preemption
@@ -1434,7 +1430,7 @@ gen12_csb_parse(const struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists, const u32 *csb)
 	 * would require some extra handling, but we don't support that.
 	 */
 	if (new_queue && ctx_away_valid)
-		return CSB_PREEMPT;
+		return true;
 
 	/*
 	 * switch detail = 5 is covered by the case above and we do not expect a
@@ -1443,29 +1439,13 @@ gen12_csb_parse(const struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists, const u32 *csb)
 	 */
 	GEM_BUG_ON(GEN12_CTX_SWITCH_DETAIL(upper_dw));
 
-	if (*execlists->active) {
-		GEM_BUG_ON(!ctx_away_valid);
-		return CSB_COMPLETE;
-	}
-
-	return CSB_NOP;
+	return false;
 }
 
-static inline enum csb_step
+static inline bool
 gen8_csb_parse(const struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists, const u32 *csb)
 {
-	unsigned int status = *csb;
-
-	if (status & GEN8_CTX_STATUS_IDLE_ACTIVE)
-		return CSB_PROMOTE;
-
-	if (status & GEN8_CTX_STATUS_PREEMPTED)
-		return CSB_PREEMPT;
-
-	if (*execlists->active)
-		return CSB_COMPLETE;
-
-	return CSB_NOP;
+	return *csb & (GEN8_CTX_STATUS_IDLE_ACTIVE | GEN8_CTX_STATUS_PREEMPTED);
 }
 
 static void process_csb(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
@@ -1504,7 +1484,7 @@ static void process_csb(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 	rmb();
 
 	do {
-		enum csb_step csb_step;
+		bool promote;
 
 		if (++head == num_entries)
 			head = 0;
@@ -1532,20 +1512,16 @@ static void process_csb(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 			  buf[2 * head + 0], buf[2 * head + 1]);
 
 		if (INTEL_GEN(engine->i915) >= 12)
-			csb_step = gen12_csb_parse(execlists, buf + 2 * head);
+			promote = gen12_csb_parse(execlists, buf + 2 * head);
 		else
-			csb_step = gen8_csb_parse(execlists, buf + 2 * head);
-
-		switch (csb_step) {
-		case CSB_PREEMPT: /* cancel old inflight, prepare for switch */
+			promote = gen8_csb_parse(execlists, buf + 2 * head);
+		if (promote) {
+			/* cancel old inflight, prepare for switch */
 			trace_ports(execlists, "preempted", execlists->active);
-
 			while (*execlists->active)
 				execlists_schedule_out(*execlists->active++);
 
-			/* fallthrough */
-		case CSB_PROMOTE: /* switch pending to inflight */
-			GEM_BUG_ON(*execlists->active);
+			/* switch pending to inflight */
 			GEM_BUG_ON(!assert_pending_valid(execlists, "promote"));
 			execlists->active =
 				memcpy(execlists->inflight,
@@ -1560,9 +1536,10 @@ static void process_csb(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 				ring_set_paused(engine, 0);
 
 			WRITE_ONCE(execlists->pending[0], NULL);
-			break;
+		} else {
+			GEM_BUG_ON(!*execlists->active);
 
-		case CSB_COMPLETE: /* port0 completed, advanced to port1 */
+			/* port0 completed, advanced to port1 */
 			trace_ports(execlists, "completed", execlists->active);
 
 			/*
@@ -1577,10 +1554,6 @@ static void process_csb(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 
 			GEM_BUG_ON(execlists->active - execlists->inflight >
 				   execlists_num_ports(execlists));
-			break;
-
-		case CSB_NOP:
-			break;
 		}
 	} while (head != tail);
 
-- 
2.23.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/execlists: Ignore lost completion events
  2019-09-07  8:43 Chris Wilson
@ 2019-09-10 10:17 ` Mika Kuoppala
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Mika Kuoppala @ 2019-09-10 10:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chris Wilson, intel-gfx

Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:

> Icelake hit an issue where it missed reporting a completion event and
> instead jumped straight to a idle->active event (skipping over the
> active->idle and not even hitting the lite-restore preemption).
>
> 661497511us : process_csb: rcs0 cs-irq head=11, tail=0
> 661497512us : process_csb: rcs0 csb[0]: status=0x10008002:0x00000020 [lite-restore]
> 661497512us : trace_ports: rcs0: preempted { 28cc8:11052, 0:0 }
> 661497513us : trace_ports: rcs0: promote { 28cc8:11054, 0:0 }
> 661497514us : __i915_request_submit: rcs0 fence 28cc8:11056, current 11052
> 661497514us : __execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0: queue_priority_hint:-2147483648, submit:yes
> 661497515us : trace_ports: rcs0: submit { 28cc8:11056, 0:0 }
> 661497530us : process_csb: rcs0 cs-irq head=0, tail=1
> 661497530us : process_csb: rcs0 csb[1]: status=0x10008002:0x00000020 [lite-restore]
> 661497531us : trace_ports: rcs0: preempted { 28cc8:11054!, 0:0 }
> 661497535us : trace_ports: rcs0: promote { 28cc8:11056, 0:0 }
> 661497540us : __i915_request_submit: rcs0 fence 28cc8:11058, current 11054
> 661497544us : __execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0: queue_priority_hint:-2147483648, submit:yes
> 661497545us : trace_ports: rcs0: submit { 28cc8:11058, 0:0 }
> 661497553us : process_csb: rcs0 cs-irq head=1, tail=2
> 661497553us : process_csb: rcs0 csb[2]: status=0x10000001:0x00000000 [idle->active]
> 661497574us : process_csb: process_csb:1538 GEM_BUG_ON(*execlists->active)
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>

Trace is convincing, tho always it feels bit uneasy
for the hardware to change the behaviour 'suddenly'.
And state folds to a binary so othing much to argue against.

Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c | 63 +++++++++--------------------
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
> index 0ddfbebbcbbc..3aad35b570d4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
> @@ -693,6 +693,9 @@ trace_ports(const struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists,
>  	const struct intel_engine_cs *engine =
>  		container_of(execlists, typeof(*engine), execlists);
>  
> +	if (!ports[0])
> +		return;
> +
>  	GEM_TRACE("%s: %s { %llx:%lld%s, %llx:%lld }\n",
>  		  engine->name, msg,
>  		  ports[0]->fence.context,
> @@ -1381,13 +1384,6 @@ reset_in_progress(const struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists)
>  	return unlikely(!__tasklet_is_enabled(&execlists->tasklet));
>  }
>  
> -enum csb_step {
> -	CSB_NOP,
> -	CSB_PROMOTE,
> -	CSB_PREEMPT,
> -	CSB_COMPLETE,
> -};
> -
>  /*
>   * Starting with Gen12, the status has a new format:
>   *
> @@ -1414,7 +1410,7 @@ enum csb_step {
>   *     bits 47-57: sw context id of the lrc the GT switched away from
>   *     bits 58-63: sw counter of the lrc the GT switched away from
>   */
> -static inline enum csb_step
> +static inline bool
>  gen12_csb_parse(const struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists, const u32 *csb)
>  {
>  	u32 lower_dw = csb[0];
> @@ -1424,7 +1420,7 @@ gen12_csb_parse(const struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists, const u32 *csb)
>  	bool new_queue = lower_dw & GEN12_CTX_STATUS_SWITCHED_TO_NEW_QUEUE;
>  
>  	if (!ctx_away_valid && ctx_to_valid)
> -		return CSB_PROMOTE;
> +		return true;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * The context switch detail is not guaranteed to be 5 when a preemption
> @@ -1434,7 +1430,7 @@ gen12_csb_parse(const struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists, const u32 *csb)
>  	 * would require some extra handling, but we don't support that.
>  	 */
>  	if (new_queue && ctx_away_valid)
> -		return CSB_PREEMPT;
> +		return true;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * switch detail = 5 is covered by the case above and we do not expect a
> @@ -1443,29 +1439,13 @@ gen12_csb_parse(const struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists, const u32 *csb)
>  	 */
>  	GEM_BUG_ON(GEN12_CTX_SWITCH_DETAIL(upper_dw));
>  
> -	if (*execlists->active) {
> -		GEM_BUG_ON(!ctx_away_valid);
> -		return CSB_COMPLETE;
> -	}
> -
> -	return CSB_NOP;
> +	return false;
>  }
>  
> -static inline enum csb_step
> +static inline bool
>  gen8_csb_parse(const struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists, const u32 *csb)
>  {
> -	unsigned int status = *csb;
> -
> -	if (status & GEN8_CTX_STATUS_IDLE_ACTIVE)
> -		return CSB_PROMOTE;
> -
> -	if (status & GEN8_CTX_STATUS_PREEMPTED)
> -		return CSB_PREEMPT;
> -
> -	if (*execlists->active)
> -		return CSB_COMPLETE;
> -
> -	return CSB_NOP;
> +	return *csb & (GEN8_CTX_STATUS_IDLE_ACTIVE | GEN8_CTX_STATUS_PREEMPTED);
>  }
>  
>  static void process_csb(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> @@ -1504,7 +1484,7 @@ static void process_csb(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>  	rmb();
>  
>  	do {
> -		enum csb_step csb_step;
> +		bool promote;
>  
>  		if (++head == num_entries)
>  			head = 0;
> @@ -1532,20 +1512,16 @@ static void process_csb(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>  			  buf[2 * head + 0], buf[2 * head + 1]);
>  
>  		if (INTEL_GEN(engine->i915) >= 12)
> -			csb_step = gen12_csb_parse(execlists, buf + 2 * head);
> +			promote = gen12_csb_parse(execlists, buf + 2 * head);
>  		else
> -			csb_step = gen8_csb_parse(execlists, buf + 2 * head);
> -
> -		switch (csb_step) {
> -		case CSB_PREEMPT: /* cancel old inflight, prepare for switch */
> +			promote = gen8_csb_parse(execlists, buf + 2 * head);
> +		if (promote) {
> +			/* cancel old inflight, prepare for switch */
>  			trace_ports(execlists, "preempted", execlists->active);
> -
>  			while (*execlists->active)
>  				execlists_schedule_out(*execlists->active++);
>  
> -			/* fallthrough */
> -		case CSB_PROMOTE: /* switch pending to inflight */
> -			GEM_BUG_ON(*execlists->active);
> +			/* switch pending to inflight */
>  			GEM_BUG_ON(!assert_pending_valid(execlists, "promote"));
>  			execlists->active =
>  				memcpy(execlists->inflight,
> @@ -1560,9 +1536,10 @@ static void process_csb(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>  				ring_set_paused(engine, 0);
>  
>  			WRITE_ONCE(execlists->pending[0], NULL);
> -			break;
> +		} else {
> +			GEM_BUG_ON(!*execlists->active);
>  
> -		case CSB_COMPLETE: /* port0 completed, advanced to port1 */
> +			/* port0 completed, advanced to port1 */
>  			trace_ports(execlists, "completed", execlists->active);
>  
>  			/*
> @@ -1577,10 +1554,6 @@ static void process_csb(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>  
>  			GEM_BUG_ON(execlists->active - execlists->inflight >
>  				   execlists_num_ports(execlists));
> -			break;
> -
> -		case CSB_NOP:
> -			break;
>  		}
>  	} while (head != tail);
>  
> -- 
> 2.23.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-09-10 10:18 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-08-31  8:25 [PATCH] drm/i915/execlists: Ignore lost completion events Chris Wilson
2019-08-31  8:37 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2019-08-31  9:05 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-09-01  5:18 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2019-09-04  7:16 ` [PATCH] " Mika Kuoppala
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-09-07  8:43 Chris Wilson
2019-09-10 10:17 ` Mika Kuoppala

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).