From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: imre.deak@intel.com, "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/ddi: Avoid long delays during system suspend / eDP disabling
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 17:40:40 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wp8vhitz.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170601142046.GD14610@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com>
On Thu, 01 Jun 2017, Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 04:58:50PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 03:55:13PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> > On Wed, 31 May 2017, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> > > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 08:05:35PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
>> > >> Atm disabling either DP or eDP outputs can generate a spurious short
>> > >> pulse interrupt. The reason is that after disabling the port the source
>> > >> will stop sending a valid stream data, while the sink expects either a
>> > >> valid stream or the idle pattern. Since neither of this is sent the sink
>> > >> assumes (after an arbitrary delay) that the link is lost and requests
>> > >> for link retraining with a short pulse.
>> > >>
>> > >> The spurious pulse is a real problem at least for eDP panels with long
>> > >> power-off / power-cycle delays: as part of disabling the output we
>> > >> disable the panel power. The subsequent spurious short pulse handling
>> > >> will have to turn the power back on, which means the driver has to do a
>> > >> redundant wait for the power-off and power-cycle delays. During system
>> > >> suspend this leads to an unnecessary delay up to ~1s on systems with
>> > >> such panels as reported by Rui.
>> > >>
>> > >> To fix this put the sink to DPMS D3 state before turning off the port.
>> > >> According to the DP spec in this state the sink should not request
>> > >> retraining. This is also what we do already on pre-ddi platforms.
>> > >>
>> > >> As an alternative I also tried configuring the port to send idle pattern
>> > >> - which is against BSPec - and leave the port in normal mode before
>> > >> turning off the port. Neither of these resolved the problem.
>> > >>
>> > >> Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
>> > >> Cc: David Weinehall <david.weinehall@linux.intel.com>
>> > >> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>> > >> Reported-and-tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
>> > >> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
>> > >
>> > > Makes sense to me.
>> >
>> > I wonder if we should write D0 on hotplug.
>>
>> D0 is the default power state IIRC, so when you plug something in it
>> should automagically go into D0. That's actually a slight problem
>> power-wise if there's no subsequent modeset to drop it into D3.
>
> There was this DP->VGA adaptor that seems to require that we set D0
> explicitly:
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99114#c5
>
> But it's an odd behaviour, the DPCD read itself succeeds, only reading a
> certain register fails (DPCD_SINK_COUNT). Based on the DP spec a sink
> should respond to AUX transfers even after being put to D3, possibly
> with a longer wake-up delay (up to 20ms AFAIR).
Also [1] where AFAICT there isn't even a hotplug after D3.
BR,
Jani.
[1] https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101044
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-01 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-31 17:05 [PATCH] drm/i915/ddi: Avoid long delays during system suspend / eDP disabling Imre Deak
2017-05-31 17:18 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-06-01 12:55 ` Jani Nikula
2017-06-01 13:58 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-06-01 14:18 ` Jani Nikula
2017-06-01 14:20 ` Imre Deak
2017-06-01 14:40 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2017-05-31 17:34 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2017-06-01 12:17 ` Imre Deak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wp8vhitz.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).