From: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Remove nested work in gpu error handling
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 16:05:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y4of6qgj.fsf@gaia.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150202100818.GC10149@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 10:38:19AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 09:17:14AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 05:03:14PM +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
>> > > @@ -2616,6 +2612,9 @@ void i915_handle_error(struct drm_device *dev, bool wedged,
>> > > va_list args;
>> > > char error_msg[80];
>> > >
>> > > + if (WARN_ON(mutex_is_locked(&dev_priv->dev->struct_mutex)))
>> > > + return;
>> > > +
>> >
>> > Oops, sorry, I should have realised this was wrong earlier. The mutex
>> > breaking occurs later in i915_handle_error.
>>
>> Oh well, already merged. Also, prts seems to complain that a bunch of
>> hang stress-tests changed from fail to timeout because of this one here.
>> Is this patch accidentally fix a bug and we just need to tune the tests,
>> or is there some new deadlock now? prts results are really thin, per usual
>> :(
>
> Yes. It will also prevent the gpu reset which those tests depend upon.
Jani pointed me on the dups. There will be more I think. The test
should have been more deep into the reset handling and instead of
bailing out we should have requeued ourselves to the least.
Sorry.
-Mika
> -Chris
>
> --
> Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-03 14:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-26 16:03 [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: Convert hangcheck from a timer into a delayed work item Mika Kuoppala
2015-01-26 16:03 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: Display current hangcheck status in debugfs Mika Kuoppala
2015-01-26 16:03 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: Remove nested work in gpu error handling Mika Kuoppala
2015-01-27 9:53 ` Chris Wilson
2015-01-28 9:37 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-01-28 15:03 ` [PATCH] " Mika Kuoppala
2015-01-28 15:30 ` Chris Wilson
2015-01-29 17:03 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-02-02 9:17 ` Chris Wilson
2015-02-02 9:38 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-02-02 10:08 ` Chris Wilson
2015-02-03 14:05 ` Mika Kuoppala [this message]
2015-01-26 16:03 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Be consistent on printing seqnos Mika Kuoppala
2015-01-27 9:52 ` Chris Wilson
2015-01-28 11:59 ` shuang.he
2015-02-03 12:23 ` Jani Nikula
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y4of6qgj.fsf@gaia.fi.intel.com \
--to=mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox