Re: [PATCH 00/71] drm/i915/chv: Add Cherryview support

From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
	"S, Deepak" <deepak.s@intel.com>
Cc: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/71] drm/i915/chv: Add Cherryview support
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 16:41:10 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y4zdwbd5.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140410125938.GY18465@intel.com>

On Thu, 10 Apr 2014, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 09:31:39AM +0530, S, Deepak wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On 4/10/2014 1:30 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:42:42AM +0530, S, Deepak wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 4/9/2014 10:23 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> >>> On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 06:05:27PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 02:30:52PM +0000, S, Deepak wrote:
>> >>>>> Hi Ville,
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I am Ok with  cleaning up and pushing the Code. Can you please tell me
>> >>>>> when we need to start pushing the code and branch to use
>> >>>>> (drm-intel-next)?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Well you can consider it pushed now that it's in the open. The patches
>> >>>> just need a bit of extra polish I think. Well, unless you're planning
>> >>>> a full blown rewrite of the code ;)
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I guess you need to take into consideration whatever bdw rc6/rps patches
>> >>>> are still in flight, but since you've been doing some review there I
>> >>>> think you have a better idea than I do how things are progressing.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I always work on top of nightly, so I guess that's a good choice :)
>> >>>
>> >>> Yes, -nightly is always the recommended branch to base upstream patches
>> >>> on. I'll sort out the conflict mess (or well, try to) if it doesn't apply
>> >>> to plain dinq or some other branch. drm-intel-next tends to be too
>> >>> outdated ;-)
>> >>> -Daniel
>> >>
>> >> Hi Daniel/Ville.
>> >>
>> >> Some of the patches are lined up for squashing right? So you want me
>> >> to work on this patches to align to upstream code and resubmit it to
>> >> same email thread?
>> >
>> > Hm, I expect this chv thread to become a bit mess really quickly tbh ;-)
>> > And since we don't have chv merged yet there's not really a baseline to do
>> > this on top.
>> >
>> > I guess the simplest approach would be for you to grab ville's chv tree,
>> > squash in the patches as discussed and then just starting on polishing
>> > your chv patches. Then as I pull in patches from this series you can drop
>> > them from yours. A bit messy, but I don't see any other approach really.
>> >
>> > Note that a pile of people are signed up to review this, so maybe hold off
>> > a bit until the review for your patches have been done.
>> > -Daniel
>> 
>> Thanks Daniel.
>> Ville can you please share your chv tree details?
>
> I rebased the lot and pushed here:
> git://gitorious.org/vsyrjala/linux.git chv_rebase

/me being lazy, did you squash/reorder patches, i.e. do the patch #
assignments [1] for review still apply?

Jani.

[1] http://mid.gmane.org/20140410110857.GW18465@intel.com

>
> -- 
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel OTC
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx