Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/locking: fix drm_modeset_acquire_ctx kernel-doc

[Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>]

On Thu, 20 Jan 2022, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 10:49 AM Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> The stack_depot member was added without kernel-doc, leading to below
>> warning. Fix it.
>>
>> ./include/drm/drm_modeset_lock.h:74: warning: Function parameter or
>> member 'stack_depot' not described in 'drm_modeset_acquire_ctx'
>>
>> Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
>> Fixes: cd06ab2fd48f ("drm/locking: add backtrace for locking contended locks without backoff")
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>> ---
>>  include/drm/drm_modeset_lock.h | 1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_modeset_lock.h b/include/drm/drm_modeset_lock.h
>> index b84693fbd2b5..ec4f543c3d95 100644
>> --- a/include/drm/drm_modeset_lock.h
>> +++ b/include/drm/drm_modeset_lock.h
>> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ struct drm_modeset_lock;
>>   * struct drm_modeset_acquire_ctx - locking context (see ww_acquire_ctx)
>>   * @ww_ctx: base acquire ctx
>>   * @contended: used internally for -EDEADLK handling
>> + * @stack_depot: used internally for contention debugging
>
> Uh would be nice to switch to the inline style, since we already have
> inline comments (just not kerneldoc). Either way:

Considered that, but looks like it's been intentionally split to
kernel-doc documentation and internal comments, and just wanted to get
this quick fix out of the way.

>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Thanks!

>
>
>>   * @locked: list of held locks
>>   * @trylock_only: trylock mode used in atomic contexts/panic notifiers
>>   * @interruptible: whether interruptible locking should be used.
>> --
>> 2.30.2
>>

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center