public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/12] drm/i915/psr: Re-create a	hsw_psr_enable_source.
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 13:06:27 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zic7jpss.fsf@nikula.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170712192042.19782-8-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

On Wed, 12 Jul 2017, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> wrote:
> This sequence is part of enable source anyways, but they
> only need to be executed once and not on every activation,
> So let's re-create hsw_enable_source.
>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
> Cc: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Vathsala NAgaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> index 2fbf803f0667..422033a6f9f6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> @@ -219,6 +219,47 @@ static void hsw_psr_enable_sink(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  	I915_WRITE(aux_ctl_reg, aux_ctl);
>  }
>  
> +static void hsw_psr_enable_source(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +{
> +	struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> +	struct drm_device *dev = dig_port->base.base.dev;
> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> +	struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(dig_port->base.base.crtc);
> +	enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = crtc->config->cpu_transcoder;
> +
> +	u32 chicken;
> +
> +	if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_support) {
> +		chicken = PSR2_VSC_ENABLE_PROG_HEADER;
> +		if (dev_priv->psr.y_cord_support)
> +			chicken |= PSR2_ADD_VERTICAL_LINE_COUNT;
> +		I915_WRITE(CHICKEN_TRANS(cpu_transcoder), chicken);
> +		I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_DEBUG_CTL,
> +			   EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_MEMUP |
> +			   EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_HPD |
> +			   EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_LPSP |
> +			   EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_MAX_SLEEP |
> +			   EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_DISP_REG_WRITE);
> +	} else {
> +		/*
> +		 * Per Spec: Avoid continuous PSR exit by masking MEMUP
> +		 * and HPD. also mask LPSP to avoid dependency on other
> +		 * drivers that might block runtime_pm besides
> +		 * preventing  other hw tracking issues now we can rely
> +		 * on frontbuffer tracking.
> +		 */
> +		I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_DEBUG_CTL,
> +			   EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_MEMUP |
> +			   EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_HPD |
> +			   EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_LPSP);
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The rest of enable source sequence that should be here is actually
> +	 * executed during activation time. So check hsw_psr_activate().
> +	 */
> +}
> +
>  static void vlv_psr_enable_source(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  {
>  	struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> @@ -474,9 +515,6 @@ void intel_psr_enable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  	struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
>  	struct drm_device *dev = intel_dig_port->base.base.dev;
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> -	struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(intel_dig_port->base.base.crtc);
> -	enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = crtc->config->cpu_transcoder;
> -	u32 chicken;
>  
>  	if (!HAS_PSR(dev_priv))
>  		return;
> @@ -501,34 +539,11 @@ void intel_psr_enable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  
>  		hsw_psr_setup_vsc(intel_dp);
>  
> -		if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_support) {
> -			chicken = PSR2_VSC_ENABLE_PROG_HEADER;
> -			if (dev_priv->psr.y_cord_support)
> -				chicken |= PSR2_ADD_VERTICAL_LINE_COUNT;
> -			I915_WRITE(CHICKEN_TRANS(cpu_transcoder), chicken);
> -			I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_DEBUG_CTL,
> -				   EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_MEMUP |
> -				   EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_HPD |
> -				   EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_LPSP |
> -				   EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_MAX_SLEEP |
> -				   EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_DISP_REG_WRITE);
> -		} else {
> -			/*
> -			 * Per Spec: Avoid continuous PSR exit by masking MEMUP
> -			 * and HPD. also mask LPSP to avoid dependency on other
> -			 * drivers that might block runtime_pm besides
> -			 * preventing  other hw tracking issues now we can rely
> -			 * on frontbuffer tracking.
> -			 */
> -			I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_DEBUG_CTL,
> -				   EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_MEMUP |
> -				   EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_HPD |
> -				   EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_LPSP);
> -		}
> -
>  		/* Enable PSR on the panel */
>  		hsw_psr_enable_sink(intel_dp);
>  
> +		hsw_psr_enable_source(intel_dp);
> +

Wouldn't it be better to keep the order? Or have the order changed in a
separate patch if you need the order changed?

BR,
Jani.

>  		if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 9)
>  			intel_psr_activate(intel_dp);
>  	} else {
> @@ -537,12 +552,6 @@ void intel_psr_enable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  		/* Enable PSR on the panel */
>  		vlv_psr_enable_sink(intel_dp);
>  
> -		/* On HSW+ enable_source also means go to PSR entry/active
> -		 * state as soon as idle_frame achieved and here would be
> -		 * to soon. However on VLV enable_source just enable PSR
> -		 * but let it on inactive state. So we might do this prior
> -		 * to active transition, i.e. here.
> -		 */
>  		vlv_psr_enable_source(intel_dp);
>  	}

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-14 10:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-12 19:20 [PATCH 00/12] PSR clean-up, new vfuncs and more use of HW tracking Rodrigo Vivi
2017-07-12 19:20 ` [PATCH 01/12] drm/i915/psr: Remove vlv_is_active function Rodrigo Vivi
2017-07-12 19:56   ` Chris Wilson
2017-07-12 21:07     ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-07-12 19:20 ` [PATCH 02/12] drm/i915/psr: Avoid any PSR stuff on platforms without support Rodrigo Vivi
2017-07-12 19:20 ` [PATCH 03/12] drm/i915/psr: vfunc for disabling source Rodrigo Vivi
2017-07-12 19:20 ` [PATCH 04/12] drm/i915/psr: hsw_psr_activate Rodrigo Vivi
2017-09-07 20:07   ` Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2017-07-12 19:20 ` [PATCH 05/12] drm/i915/psr: Add activate vfunc Rodrigo Vivi
2017-07-12 19:20 ` [PATCH 06/12] drm/i915/psr: Unify VSC setup functions Rodrigo Vivi
2017-07-12 19:20 ` [PATCH 07/12] drm/i915/psr: Re-create a hsw_psr_enable_source Rodrigo Vivi
2017-07-14 10:06   ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2017-07-14 16:35     ` [PATCH 1/2] " Rodrigo Vivi
2017-07-14 16:35       ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/psr: Move hsw_enable_source after enabling sink Rodrigo Vivi
2017-07-12 19:20 ` [PATCH 08/12] drm/i915/psr: Re-org Activate after enable Rodrigo Vivi
2017-07-14 10:07   ` Jani Nikula
2017-07-14 16:40     ` [PATCH] " Rodrigo Vivi
2017-07-12 19:20 ` [PATCH 09/12] drm/i915/psr: Add setup VSC vfunc Rodrigo Vivi
2017-07-12 19:20 ` [PATCH 10/12] drm/i915/psr: Add enable_sink vfunc Rodrigo Vivi
2017-09-07 20:29   ` Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2017-07-12 19:20 ` [PATCH 11/12] drm/i915/psr: Add enable_source vfunc Rodrigo Vivi
2017-09-07 20:30   ` Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
2017-07-12 19:20 ` [PATCH 12/12] drm/i915/psr: Use more PSR HW tracking Rodrigo Vivi
2017-07-12 19:37 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for PSR clean-up, new vfuncs and more use of " Patchwork
2017-07-14 16:38 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for PSR clean-up, new vfuncs and more use of HW tracking. (rev3) Patchwork
2017-07-14 16:58 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for PSR clean-up, new vfuncs and more use of HW tracking. (rev4) Patchwork
2017-09-07 20:18 ` [PATCH 00/12] PSR clean-up, new vfuncs and more use of HW tracking Pandiyan, Dhinakaran

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87zic7jpss.fsf@nikula.org \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox