intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] drm: Add definitions for DP compliance Video pattern tests
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 17:33:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ziilbva8.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1484893418-11309-4-git-send-email-manasi.d.navare@intel.com>

On Fri, 20 Jan 2017, Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com> wrote:
> v3:
> * Fix the conventions in bit definitions (Jani Nikula)
> v2:
> * Add all the other DP Complianec TEST register defs (Jani Nikula)
> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
> Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> ---
>  include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 64 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h b/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
> index 0468135..7ab4153 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
> @@ -417,6 +417,70 @@
>  #define DP_TEST_LANE_COUNT		    0x220
>  
>  #define DP_TEST_PATTERN			    0x221
> +# define DP_NO_TEST_PATTERN                 0x0
> +# define DP_COLOR_RAMP                      0x1
> +# define DP_BLACK_AND_WHITE_VERTICAL_LINES  0x2
> +# define DP_COLOR_SQUARE                    0x3
> +
> +#define DP_TEST_H_TOTAL_HI                  0x222
> +#define DP_TEST_H_TOTAl_LO                  0x223
                         ^
Sorry, didn't notice it before, but the l in TOTAL is lower case.

> +
> +#define DP_TEST_V_TOTAL_HI                  0x224
> +#define DP_TEST_V_TOTAl_LO                  0x225
                         ^
Ditto.

> +
> +#define DP_TEST_H_START_HI                  0x226
> +#define DP_TEST_H_START_LO                  0x227
> +
> +#define DP_TEST_V_START_HI                  0x228
> +#define DP_TEST_V_START_LO                  0x229
> +
> +#define DP_TEST_HSYNC_HI                    0x22A
> +# define DP_TEST_HSYNC_POLARITY             (1 << 7)
> +# define DP_TEST_HSYNC_WIDTH_HI_MASK        (127 << 0)
> +#define DP_TEST_HSYNC_WIDTH_LO              0x22B
> +
> +#define DP_TEST_VSYNC_HI                    0x22C
> +# define DP_TEST_VSYNC_POLARITY             (1 << 7)
> +# define DP_TEST_VSYNC_WIDTH_HI_MASK        (127 << 0)
> +#define DP_TEST_VSYNC_WIDTH_LO              0x22D
> +
> +#define DP_TEST_H_WIDTH_HI                  0x22E
> +#define DP_TEST_H_WIDTH_LO                  0x22F
> +
> +#define DP_TEST_V_HEIGHT_HI                 0x230
> +#define DP_TEST_V_HEIGHT_LO                 0x231
> +
> +#define DP_TEST_MISC0                       0x232
> +# define DP_TEST_SYNC_CLOCK                 (1 << 0)
> +# define DP_CLOCK_ASYNC                     0x0
> +# define DP_CLOCK_SYNC                      0x1

The above two are not necessary.

> +# define DP_TEST_COLOR_FORMAT_MASK          (3 << 1)
> +# define DP_TEST_COLOR_FORMAT_SHIFT         1
> +# define DP_COLOR_FORMAT_RGB                (0 << 1)
> +# define DP_COLOR_FORMAT_YCbCr422           (1 << 1)
> +# define DP_COLOR_FORMAT_YCbCr444           (2 << 1)
> +# define DP_TEST_DYNAMIC_RANGE              (1 << 3)

I'd just name this DP_TEST_DYNAMIC_RANGE_CEA...

> +# define DP_VESA_RANGE                      (0 << 3)
> +# define DP_CEA_RANGE                       (1 << 3)

...and drop these two. But whatever.

> +# define DP_TEST_YCBCR_COEFFICIENTS         (1 << 4)
> +# define DP_YCBCR_COEFFICIENTS_ITU601       (0 << 4)
> +# define DP_YCBCR_COEFFICIENTS_ITU709       (1 << 4)
> +# define DP_TEST_BIT_DEPTH_MASK             (7 << 5)
> +# define DP_TEST_BIT_DEPTH_SHIFT            5
> +# define DP_TEST_BIT_DEPTH_6                (0 << 5)
> +# define DP_TEST_BIT_DEPTH_8                (1 << 5)
> +# define DP_TEST_BIT_DEPTH_10               (2 << 5)
> +# define DP_TEST_BIT_DEPTH_12               (3 << 5)
> +# define DP_TEST_BIT_DEPTH_16               (4 << 5)

Blank line here.

> +#define DP_TEST_MISC1                       0x233
> +# define DP_TEST_REFRESH_DENOMINATOR        (1 << 0)
> +# define REFRESH_DENOMINATOR_1              0x0
> +# define REFRESH_DENOMINATOR_1_001          0x1

DP_ prefix.

> +# define DP_TEST_INTERLACED                 (1 << 1)
> +# define DP_NON_INTERLACED                  (0 << 1)
> +# define DP_INTERLACED                      (1 << 1)

No need for these two. DP_TEST_INTERLACED is sufficient.

> +
> +#define DP_TEST_REFRESH_RATE_NUMERATOR      0x234
>  
>  #define DP_TEST_CRC_R_CR		    0x240
>  #define DP_TEST_CRC_G_Y			    0x242

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-20 15:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-20  6:23 [PATCH 0/4] Add Automation Support for DP Compliance (Rev 5) Manasi Navare
2017-01-20  6:23 ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: Add support for DP link training compliance Manasi Navare
2017-01-20 15:05   ` Jani Nikula
2017-01-23 20:50     ` Manasi Navare
2017-01-23 23:54       ` Manasi Navare
2017-01-20  6:23 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: Fixes to support DP Compliance EDID tests Manasi Navare
2017-01-20  6:23 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm: Add definitions for DP compliance Video pattern tests Manasi Navare
2017-01-20 15:33   ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2017-01-20 16:13     ` Manasi Navare
2017-01-20 16:28       ` Jani Nikula
2017-01-20  6:23 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Add support for DP Video pattern compliance tests Manasi Navare
2017-01-20 18:34   ` Manasi Navare
2017-01-20  6:54 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Add Automation Support for DP Compliance (Rev 5) Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-01-21  3:09 [PATCH 0/4] Add automation support for DP Compliance (Rev 6) Manasi Navare
2017-01-21  3:09 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm: Add definitions for DP compliance Video pattern tests Manasi Navare
2017-01-24 16:05   ` Jani Nikula
2017-01-17 22:57 [PATCH 0/4] Add Automation Support for DP Compliance Testing (Rev 4) Manasi Navare
2017-01-17 22:57 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm: Add definitions for DP compliance Video pattern tests Manasi Navare
2017-01-18 17:35   ` Manasi Navare
2017-01-19 13:31   ` Jani Nikula

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ziilbva8.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=manasi.d.navare@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).