public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>,
	Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Remove bogus __init annotation from DMI callbacks
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 10:10:01 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zjephyye.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1409157679-20111-1-git-send-email-minipli@googlemail.com>

On Wed, 27 Aug 2014, Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com> wrote:
> The __init annotations for the DMI callback functions are wrong as this
> code can be called even after the module has been initialized, e.g. like
> this:
>
>   # echo 1 > /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000:00:02.0/remove
>   # modprobe i915
>   # echo 1 > /sys/bus/pci/rescan
>
> The first command will remove the PCI device from the kernel's device
> list so the second command won't see it right away. But as it registers
> a PCI driver it'll see it on the third command. If the system happens to
> match one of the DMI table entries we'll try to call a function in long
> released memory and generate an Oops, at best.
>
> Fix this by removing the bogus annotation.
>
> Modpost should have caught that one but it ignores section reference
> mismatches from the .rodata section. :/
>
> Fixes: 25e341cfc33d ("drm/i915: quirk away broken OpRegion VBT")
> Fixes: 8ca4013d702d ("CHROMIUM: i915: Add DMI override to skip CRT...")
> Fixes: 425d244c8670 ("drm/i915: ignore LVDS on intel graphics systems...")
> Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> Cc: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
> Cc: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>	# Can modpost be fixed?
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

Nice catch! Thanks for the patch, pushed to drm-intel-fixes.

BR,
Jani.



> ---
>
> In the long run me might want to move the DMI tests to some __init code
> to be able to mark the DMI tables as __initconst, thereby allowing to
> release this memory after module initialization. That would safe us some
> ~11 kB of memory, as the DMI data shouldn't change at run-time.
>
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c |    2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c  |    2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c |    2 +-
>  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
> index a66955037e4e..eee79e1c3222 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
> @@ -1123,7 +1123,7 @@ init_vbt_defaults(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -static int __init intel_no_opregion_vbt_callback(const struct dmi_system_id *id)
> +static int intel_no_opregion_vbt_callback(const struct dmi_system_id *id)
>  {
>  	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Falling back to manually reading VBT from "
>  		      "VBIOS ROM for %s\n",
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c
> index e8abfce40976..9212e6504e0f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c
> @@ -804,7 +804,7 @@ static const struct drm_encoder_funcs intel_crt_enc_funcs = {
>  	.destroy = intel_encoder_destroy,
>  };
>  
> -static int __init intel_no_crt_dmi_callback(const struct dmi_system_id *id)
> +static int intel_no_crt_dmi_callback(const struct dmi_system_id *id)
>  {
>  	DRM_INFO("Skipping CRT initialization for %s\n", id->ident);
>  	return 1;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c
> index 881361c0f27e..fdf40267249c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c
> @@ -538,7 +538,7 @@ static const struct drm_encoder_funcs intel_lvds_enc_funcs = {
>  	.destroy = intel_encoder_destroy,
>  };
>  
> -static int __init intel_no_lvds_dmi_callback(const struct dmi_system_id *id)
> +static int intel_no_lvds_dmi_callback(const struct dmi_system_id *id)
>  {
>  	DRM_INFO("Skipping LVDS initialization for %s\n", id->ident);
>  	return 1;
> -- 
> 1.7.10.4
>

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center

      reply	other threads:[~2014-08-28  7:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-27 16:41 [PATCH] drm/i915: Remove bogus __init annotation from DMI callbacks Mathias Krause
2014-08-28  7:10 ` Jani Nikula [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87zjephyye.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dlaurie@chromium.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jarod@redhat.com \
    --cc=minipli@googlemail.com \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox