From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, HK_RANDOM_FROM,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1975DC43603 for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 08:00:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC6F724684 for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 08:00:41 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org EC6F724684 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DFC78989F; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 08:00:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06ECD8989F for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 08:00:40 +0000 (UTC) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Dec 2019 00:00:33 -0800 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.69,335,1571727600"; d="scan'208";a="210742247" Received: from dtriolet-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.251.84.191]) ([10.251.84.191]) by orsmga008-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 20 Dec 2019 00:00:32 -0800 To: Chris Wilson , Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org References: <20191219180019.25562-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> <20191219180019.25562-8-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> <157678905483.6469.13631061410344244883@skylake-alporthouse-com> From: Tvrtko Ursulin Organization: Intel Corporation UK Plc Message-ID: <92110a8c-16ba-e6ba-0c0e-53482c4ce98d@linux.intel.com> Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2019 08:00:30 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <157678905483.6469.13631061410344244883@skylake-alporthouse-com> Content-Language: en-US Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC 7/8] drm/i915: Contexts can use struct pid stored in the client X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" On 19/12/2019 20:57, Chris Wilson wrote: > Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-12-19 18:00:18) >> From: Tvrtko Ursulin >> >> Now that contexts keep their parent client reference counted, we can >> remove separate struct pid reference owned by contexts in favour of the >> one already held by the client. > > Ok. I do like the client abstraction, and I think we want to develop it > further. Okay, we'll have to see what you have in mind for a gem vs drm client and so on then. Regards, Tvrtko _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx