From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26227C05027 for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2023 09:39:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A232E10E4B8; Thu, 2 Feb 2023 09:39:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga18.intel.com (mga18.intel.com [134.134.136.126]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79AEA10E4B8; Thu, 2 Feb 2023 09:39:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1675330773; x=1706866773; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:references:from: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TxVncC8sDWqPcKk/0yaKgffM7cA6YOJZMIuLRp/9FCQ=; b=C5lg+1AtOAgaOmJ92XgTQAXVi1oD0TczsuR4uuueM+PRytMfKVaw+nN4 qGy8GAwlS03Fv62m/7J7NaiZ5m8wCZl1zLMz0UdulWyESm4273eI9laCC wQav8aPu6yibDCMdie1J1PHEaH5h/hglZCbIUDSdhT1ovpozH5J4wJV2P 7fog7METueOV+9TGFH9ZWv1qeAtusn4PpHlDLlLtPjcO2eX/e5Dt139Fu YMzPdHAMdEwxU3JSC56S2K5b7On7R39QQdrmN0Jzu7eGlnLNvH4KuxPsg tFZt1HLBcfW3iH2RpvaiFT5PGHn0y0YFAC9aZcMkVn/zG5oK+BiSjFndd g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10608"; a="312051154" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.97,267,1669104000"; d="scan'208";a="312051154" Received: from orsmga007.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.58]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Feb 2023 01:39:29 -0800 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10608"; a="658664509" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.97,267,1669104000"; d="scan'208";a="658664509" Received: from ahajda-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.213.4.221]) ([10.213.4.221]) by orsmga007-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Feb 2023 01:39:28 -0800 Message-ID: <983c9904-e9f7-1aa2-fb8c-738ad47195a7@intel.com> Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2023 10:39:26 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/102.0 Thunderbird/102.6.1 Content-Language: en-US To: Tvrtko Ursulin , Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org References: <20230201165146.4056691-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> <117482b6-7baf-5b79-27ed-7c33630bd86d@linux.intel.com> From: Andrzej Hajda Organization: Intel Technology Poland sp. z o.o. - ul. Slowackiego 173, 80-298 Gdansk - KRS 101882 - NIP 957-07-52-316 In-Reply-To: <117482b6-7baf-5b79-27ed-7c33630bd86d@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] drm/i915: Consolidate TLB invalidation flow X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" On 02.02.2023 09:33, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > On 02/02/2023 07:43, Andrzej Hajda wrote: >> On 01.02.2023 17:51, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > [snip] > > > > Btw - do you have any idea why the test is suppressed already?! CI told > me BAT was a success... Except this patch, igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_tlb always succeeds[1][2]. So I guess this is just CI logic which do not trust new tests, sounds reasonable. Lets wait few days to see if it changes. [1]: http://gfx-ci.igk.intel.com/cibuglog-ng/results/all?query_key=d3cc1f04e52acd0f911cd54fd855a3f085a40e14 [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/intel-gfx/?q=igt%40i915_selftest%40live%40gt_tlb Regards Andrzej > > Regards, > > Tvrtko