From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5260FC5479D for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 15:01:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F7DB10E440; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 15:00:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 043D710E440 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 15:00:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1673276455; x=1704812455; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=r9Y1g26n/Ssg2vcH2HKymnnb0cgq9vA0t781z6vBCYc=; b=Juac0+YKPIbIXwW8XszL/kYF8oUTBpW9RGhcrE94cAGH/ugwBXoLd9Ff 2P8PLxOCber6VFdsWLtF2SDbixZ59m9gm75J6etkobug6IlLvM38rFrmN l7m7Zu0hleiHsOHnLOaPdNA7QBkwQlzJzkS/oIRWjVl2oy39NKmbzdg3w 6dR7JwONZXh0IUh7h9afWBl98NxHhOvr+vy75vXU+Bx7sG9qO0m4fhkHM RdsHv2hWVxGkXbh4QEPlHspATG6AvY5kwM7kCFD24tfRUFiJm/tcbn0cb BHZHaMtkneNhyynh9pkwKdSpBt6K3NUEFYfaYWjeajTrZ6WLTHKOUpZ8h A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10585"; a="350103027" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,311,1665471600"; d="scan'208";a="350103027" Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Jan 2023 07:00:53 -0800 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10585"; a="799047989" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,311,1665471600"; d="scan'208";a="799047989" Received: from lherman-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.213.209.244]) ([10.213.209.244]) by fmsmga001-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Jan 2023 07:00:51 -0800 Message-ID: <9c86dff0-e7f4-60b9-ed3e-6ad51cacaa01@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 15:00:49 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.1 Content-Language: en-US To: Mirsad Goran Todorovac , srinivas pandruvada , LKML , jani.nikula@linux.intel.com, joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com, Rodrigo Vivi References: <05424a5351a847786377a548dba0759917d8046c.camel@linux.intel.com> <15ef1bb9-7312-5d98-8bf0-0af1a37cfd2a@linux.intel.com> <619bdecc-cf87-60a4-f50d-836f4c073ea7@alu.unizg.hr> <8e080674-36ab-9260-046e-f4e3c931a3b9@alu.unizg.hr> <96661293-32d7-0bb4-fb0e-28086eaaecc3@linux.intel.com> From: Tvrtko Ursulin Organization: Intel Corporation UK Plc In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] LOOKS GOOD: Possible regression in drm/i915 driver: memleak X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Thorsten Leemhuis Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" On 25/12/2022 22:48, Mirsad Goran Todorovac wrote: > On 22. 12. 2022. 09:04, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: >> >> In the meantime definitely thanks a lot for testing this quickly and >> reporting back! > > Don't think much of it - anyone with CONFIG_KMEMLEAK enabled could have > caught this bug. > > I was surprised that you found the fix in less than an hour without me > having to bisect :) Fix sadly has a problem handling shared buffers so different version will hopefully appear soon. Regards, Tvrtko