From: Matthew Auld <matthew.william.auld@gmail.com>
To: Robert Bragg <robert@sixbynine.org>
Cc: Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH igt v3 08/11] igt/gem_exec_parse: update cmd-crossing-page for >= v8
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 22:10:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAM0jSHOWFLcLyhSFCXKR=nbbz8h04Du-FeY5ZRVRc6nAB7XoDQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161109161602.2402-9-robert@sixbynine.org>
On 9 November 2016 at 16:15, Robert Bragg <robert@sixbynine.org> wrote:
> Since an access violation won't return an error to userspace for v >= 8
> of the command parser this updates the cmd-crossing-page test to
> explicitly read back from SO_WRITE_OFFSET[0] to see that the command
> wasn't squashed to a NOOP.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Bragg <robert@sixbynine.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-11 22:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-09 16:15 [PATCH igt v3 00/11] corresponding changes for i915-perf interface Robert Bragg
2016-11-09 16:15 ` [PATCH igt v3 01/11] igt/perf: add i915 perf stream tests for Haswell Robert Bragg
2016-11-09 16:33 ` Chris Wilson
2016-11-10 23:03 ` Matthew Auld
2016-11-14 15:52 ` Robert Bragg
2016-11-09 16:15 ` [PATCH igt v3 02/11] igt/gem_exec_parse: some minor cleanups Robert Bragg
2016-11-11 21:49 ` Matthew Auld
2016-11-09 16:15 ` [PATCH igt v3 03/11] igt/gem_exec_parse: move hsw_load_register_reg down Robert Bragg
2016-11-11 21:51 ` Matthew Auld
2016-11-09 16:15 ` [PATCH igt v3 04/11] igt/gem_exec_parse: update hsw_load_register_reg Robert Bragg
2016-11-11 22:01 ` Matthew Auld
2016-11-09 16:15 ` [PATCH igt v3 05/11] igt/gem_exec_parse: req. v < 9 for oacontrol tracking test Robert Bragg
2016-11-11 22:07 ` Matthew Auld
2016-11-09 16:15 ` [PATCH igt v3 06/11] igt/gem_exec_parse: make basic-rejected version agnostic Robert Bragg
2016-11-14 18:57 ` Matthew Auld
2016-11-09 16:15 ` [PATCH igt v3 07/11] igt/gem_exec_parse: update bitmasks test for v >=8 Robert Bragg
2016-11-11 22:08 ` Matthew Auld
2016-11-09 16:15 ` [PATCH igt v3 08/11] igt/gem_exec_parse: update cmd-crossing-page for >= v8 Robert Bragg
2016-11-11 22:10 ` Matthew Auld [this message]
2016-11-09 16:16 ` [PATCH igt v3 09/11] igt/gem_exec_parse: update hsw_load_register_reg for v >= 8 Robert Bragg
2016-11-11 22:14 ` Matthew Auld
2016-11-09 16:16 ` [PATCH igt v3 10/11] igt/gem_exec_parse: update registers test " Robert Bragg
2016-11-11 22:28 ` Matthew Auld
2016-11-09 16:16 ` [PATCH igt v3 11/11] igt/gem_exec_parse: check oacontrol lri bad for >= v9 Robert Bragg
2016-11-11 22:36 ` Matthew Auld
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAM0jSHOWFLcLyhSFCXKR=nbbz8h04Du-FeY5ZRVRc6nAB7XoDQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=matthew.william.auld@gmail.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=robert@sixbynine.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).