From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/rps: Prefer REG_FIELD_GET in intel_rps_get_cagf
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 12:11:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y1LEr6pVKwFdxsMx@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221019233721.3270601-2-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 04:37:17PM -0700, Ashutosh Dixit wrote:
> Instead of masks/shifts settle on REG_FIELD_GET as the standard way to
> extract reg fields. This allows future patches touching this code to also
> consistently use REG_FIELD_GET and friends.
>
> Suggested-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm_debugfs.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h | 12 ++++--------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c | 11 +++++------
> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm_debugfs.c
> index 40d0a3be42acf..979e602946549 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm_debugfs.c
> @@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ void intel_gt_pm_frequency_dump(struct intel_gt *gt, struct drm_printer *p)
> drm_printf(p, "Current VID: %d\n", (rgvstat & MEMSTAT_VID_MASK) >>
> MEMSTAT_VID_SHIFT);
> drm_printf(p, "Current P-state: %d\n",
> - (rgvstat & MEMSTAT_PSTATE_MASK) >> MEMSTAT_PSTATE_SHIFT);
> + REG_FIELD_GET(MEMSTAT_PSTATE_MASK, rgvstat));
> } else if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(i915) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(i915)) {
> u32 rpmodectl, freq_sts;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h
> index 36d95b79022c0..35c039573294c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h
> @@ -794,12 +794,9 @@
> #define GEN6_RP_DOWN_TIMEOUT _MMIO(0xa010)
> #define GEN6_RP_INTERRUPT_LIMITS _MMIO(0xa014)
> #define GEN6_RPSTAT1 _MMIO(0xa01c)
> -#define GEN6_CAGF_SHIFT 8
> -#define HSW_CAGF_SHIFT 7
> -#define GEN9_CAGF_SHIFT 23
> -#define GEN6_CAGF_MASK (0x7f << GEN6_CAGF_SHIFT)
> -#define HSW_CAGF_MASK (0x7f << HSW_CAGF_SHIFT)
> -#define GEN9_CAGF_MASK (0x1ff << GEN9_CAGF_SHIFT)
> +#define GEN6_CAGF_MASK REG_GENMASK(14, 8)
> +#define HSW_CAGF_MASK REG_GENMASK(13, 7)
> +#define GEN9_CAGF_MASK REG_GENMASK(31, 23)
> #define GEN6_RP_CONTROL _MMIO(0xa024)
> #define GEN6_RP_MEDIA_TURBO (1 << 11)
> #define GEN6_RP_MEDIA_MODE_MASK (3 << 9)
> @@ -1370,8 +1367,7 @@
> #define MEMSTAT_ILK _MMIO(0x111f8)
> #define MEMSTAT_VID_MASK 0x7f00
> #define MEMSTAT_VID_SHIFT 8
> -#define MEMSTAT_PSTATE_MASK 0x00f8
> -#define MEMSTAT_PSTATE_SHIFT 3
> +#define MEMSTAT_PSTATE_MASK REG_GENMASK(7, 3)
> #define MEMSTAT_MON_ACTV (1 << 2)
> #define MEMSTAT_SRC_CTL_MASK 0x0003
> #define MEMSTAT_SRC_CTL_CORE 0
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
> index fc23c562d9b2a..5bd6671554a6e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
> @@ -2074,16 +2074,15 @@ u32 intel_rps_get_cagf(struct intel_rps *rps, u32 rpstat)
> u32 cagf;
>
> if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(i915) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(i915))
> - cagf = (rpstat >> 8) & 0xff;
> + cagf = REG_FIELD_GET(RPE_MASK, rpstat);
> else if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) >= 9)
> - cagf = (rpstat & GEN9_CAGF_MASK) >> GEN9_CAGF_SHIFT;
> + cagf = REG_FIELD_GET(GEN9_CAGF_MASK, rpstat);
> else if (IS_HASWELL(i915) || IS_BROADWELL(i915))
> - cagf = (rpstat & HSW_CAGF_MASK) >> HSW_CAGF_SHIFT;
> + cagf = REG_FIELD_GET(HSW_CAGF_MASK, rpstat);
> else if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) >= 6)
> - cagf = (rpstat & GEN6_CAGF_MASK) >> GEN6_CAGF_SHIFT;
> + cagf = REG_FIELD_GET(GEN6_CAGF_MASK, rpstat);
> else
> - cagf = gen5_invert_freq(rps, (rpstat & MEMSTAT_PSTATE_MASK) >>
> - MEMSTAT_PSTATE_SHIFT);
> + cagf = gen5_invert_freq(rps, REG_FIELD_GET(MEMSTAT_PSTATE_MASK, rpstat));
>
> return cagf;
> }
> --
> 2.38.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-21 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-19 23:37 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/5] i915: CAGF and RC6 changes for MTL Ashutosh Dixit
2022-10-19 23:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/rps: Prefer REG_FIELD_GET in intel_rps_get_cagf Ashutosh Dixit
2022-10-21 16:11 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2022-10-19 23:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: Use GEN12_RPSTAT register for GT freq Ashutosh Dixit
2022-10-21 16:12 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2022-10-19 23:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915/mtl: Modify CAGF functions for MTL Ashutosh Dixit
2022-10-21 16:02 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-10-21 16:12 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2022-10-19 23:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915/gt: Use RC6 residency types as arguments to residency functions Ashutosh Dixit
2022-10-21 16:15 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2022-10-19 23:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915/mtl: C6 residency and C state type for MTL SAMedia Ashutosh Dixit
2022-10-21 16:35 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2022-10-24 19:16 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2022-10-24 19:49 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2022-10-20 0:17 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for i915: CAGF and RC6 changes for MTL (rev8) Patchwork
2022-10-20 0:38 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2022-10-21 17:43 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for i915: CAGF and RC6 changes for MTL (rev9) Patchwork
2022-10-21 18:04 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-10-22 9:58 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-10-24 19:13 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/5] i915: CAGF and RC6 changes for MTL Ashutosh Dixit
2022-10-24 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/rps: Prefer REG_FIELD_GET in intel_rps_get_cagf Ashutosh Dixit
2022-10-24 20:24 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/5] i915: CAGF and RC6 changes for MTL Ashutosh Dixit
2022-10-24 20:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/rps: Prefer REG_FIELD_GET in intel_rps_get_cagf Ashutosh Dixit
2022-11-14 12:33 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/5] i915: CAGF and RC6 changes for MTL Badal Nilawar
2022-11-14 12:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/rps: Prefer REG_FIELD_GET in intel_rps_get_cagf Badal Nilawar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y1LEr6pVKwFdxsMx@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox