Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 20/20] dma-resv: Give the docs a do-over

Daniel Vetter
2021-08-30T19:38:25Z

On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 12:47:05PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Specifically document the new/clarified rules around how the shared
> fences do not have any ordering requirements against the exclusive
> fence.
>
> But also document all the things a bit better, given how central
> struct dma_resv to dynamic buffer management the docs have been very
> inadequat.
>
> - Lots more links to other pieces of the puzzle. Unfortunately
> ttm_buffer_object has no docs, so no links :-(
>
> - Explain/complain a bit about dma_resv_locking_ctx(). I still don't
> like that one, but fixing the ttm call chains is going to be
> horrible. Plus we want to plug in real slowpath locking when we do
> that anyway.
>
> - Main part of the patch is some actual docs for struct dma_resv.
>
> Overall I think we still have a lot of bad naming in this area (e.g.
> dma_resv.fence is singular, but contains the multiple shared fences),
> but I think that's more indicative of how the semantics and rules are
> just not great.
>
> Another thing that's real awkard is how chaining exclusive fences
> right now means direct dma_resv.exclusive_fence pointer access with an
> rcu_assign_pointer. Not so great either.
>
> v2:
> - Fix a pile of typos (Matt, Jason)
> - Hammer it in that breaking the rules leads to use-after-free issues
> around dma-buf sharing (Christian)
>
> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
> Cc: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
> Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
> Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
> Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org

Also pushed to drm-misc-next.
-Daniel

> ---
> drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c | 24 ++++++---
> include/linux/dma-buf.h | 7 +++
> include/linux/dma-resv.h | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 3 files changed, 124 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c
> index e744fd87c63c..84fbe60629e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c
> @@ -48,6 +48,8 @@
> * write operations) or N shared fences (read operations). The RCU
> * mechanism is used to protect read access to fences from locked
> * write-side updates.
> + *
> + * See struct dma_resv for more details.
> */
>
> DEFINE_WD_CLASS(reservation_ww_class);
> @@ -137,7 +139,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_resv_fini);
> * @num_fences: number of fences we want to add
> *
> * Should be called before dma_resv_add_shared_fence(). Must
> - * be called with obj->lock held.
> + * be called with @obj locked through dma_resv_lock().
> + *
> + * Note that the preallocated slots need to be re-reserved if @obj is unlocked
> + * at any time before calling dma_resv_add_shared_fence(). This is validated
> + * when CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES is enabled.
> *
> * RETURNS
> * Zero for success, or -errno
> @@ -234,8 +240,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_resv_reset_shared_max);
> * @obj: the reservation object
> * @fence: the shared fence to add
> *
> - * Add a fence to a shared slot, obj->lock must be held, and
> + * Add a fence to a shared slot, @obj must be locked with dma_resv_lock(), and
> * dma_resv_reserve_shared() has been called.
> + *
> + * See also &dma_resv.fence for a discussion of the semantics.
> */
> void dma_resv_add_shared_fence(struct dma_resv *obj, struct dma_fence *fence)
> {
> @@ -278,9 +286,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_resv_add_shared_fence);
> /**
> * dma_resv_add_excl_fence - Add an exclusive fence.
> * @obj: the reservation object
> - * @fence: the shared fence to add
> + * @fence: the exclusive fence to add
> *
> - * Add a fence to the exclusive slot. The obj->lock must be held.
> + * Add a fence to the exclusive slot. @obj must be locked with dma_resv_lock().
> + * Note that this function replaces all fences attached to @obj, see also
> + * &dma_resv.fence_excl for a discussion of the semantics.
> */
> void dma_resv_add_excl_fence(struct dma_resv *obj, struct dma_fence *fence)
> {
> @@ -609,9 +619,11 @@ static inline int dma_resv_test_signaled_single(struct dma_fence *passed_fence)
> * fence
> *
> * Callers are not required to hold specific locks, but maybe hold
> - * dma_resv_lock() already
> + * dma_resv_lock() already.
> + *
> * RETURNS
> - * true if all fences signaled, else false
> + *
> + * True if all fences signaled, else false.
> */
> bool dma_resv_test_signaled(struct dma_resv *obj, bool test_all)
> {
> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-buf.h b/include/linux/dma-buf.h
> index 678b2006be78..fc62b5f9980c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dma-buf.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dma-buf.h
> @@ -420,6 +420,13 @@ struct dma_buf {
> * - Dynamic importers should set fences for any access that they can't
> * disable immediately from their &dma_buf_attach_ops.move_notify
> * callback.
> + *
> + * IMPORTANT:
> + *
> + * All drivers must obey the struct dma_resv rules, specifically the
> + * rules for updating fences, see &dma_resv.fence_excl and
> + * &dma_resv.fence. If these dependency rules are broken access tracking
> + * can be lost resulting in use after free issues.
> */
> struct dma_resv *resv;
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-resv.h b/include/linux/dma-resv.h
> index e1ca2080a1ff..9100dd3dc21f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dma-resv.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dma-resv.h
> @@ -62,16 +62,90 @@ struct dma_resv_list {
>
> /**
> * struct dma_resv - a reservation object manages fences for a buffer
> - * @lock: update side lock
> - * @seq: sequence count for managing RCU read-side synchronization
> - * @fence_excl: the exclusive fence, if there is one currently
> - * @fence: list of current shared fences
> + *
> + * There are multiple uses for this, with sometimes slightly different rules in
> + * how the fence slots are used.
> + *
> + * One use is to synchronize cross-driver access to a struct dma_buf, either for
> + * dynamic buffer management or just to handle implicit synchronization between
> + * different users of the buffer in userspace. See &dma_buf.resv for a more
> + * in-depth discussion.
> + *
> + * The other major use is to manage access and locking within a driver in a
> + * buffer based memory manager. struct ttm_buffer_object is the canonical
> + * example here, since this is where reservation objects originated from. But
> + * use in drivers is spreading and some drivers also manage struct
> + * drm_gem_object with the same scheme.
> */
> struct dma_resv {
> + /**
> + * @lock:
> + *
> + * Update side lock. Don't use directly, instead use the wrapper
> + * functions like dma_resv_lock() and dma_resv_unlock().
> + *
> + * Drivers which use the reservation object to manage memory dynamically
> + * also use this lock to protect buffer object state like placement,
> + * allocation policies or throughout command submission.
> + */
> struct ww_mutex lock;
> +
> + /**
> + * @seq:
> + *
> + * Sequence count for managing RCU read-side synchronization, allows
> + * read-only access to @fence_excl and @fence while ensuring we take a
> + * consistent snapshot.
> + */
> seqcount_ww_mutex_t seq;
>
> + /**
> + * @fence_excl:
> + *
> + * The exclusive fence, if there is one currently.
> + *
> + * There are two ways to update this fence:
> + *
> + * - First by calling dma_resv_add_excl_fence(), which replaces all
> + * fences attached to the reservation object. To guarantee that no
> + * fences are lost, this new fence must signal only after all previous
> + * fences, both shared and exclusive, have signalled. In some cases it
> + * is convenient to achieve that by attaching a struct dma_fence_array
> + * with all the new and old fences.
> + *
> + * - Alternatively the fence can be set directly, which leaves the
> + * shared fences unchanged. To guarantee that no fences are lost, this
> + * new fence must signal only after the previous exclusive fence has
> + * signalled. Since the shared fences are staying intact, it is not
> + * necessary to maintain any ordering against those. If semantically
> + * only a new access is added without actually treating the previous
> + * one as a dependency the exclusive fences can be strung together
> + * using struct dma_fence_chain.
> + *
> + * Note that actual semantics of what an exclusive or shared fence mean
> + * is defined by the user, for reservation objects shared across drivers
> + * see &dma_buf.resv.
> + */
> struct dma_fence __rcu *fence_excl;
> +
> + /**
> + * @fence:
> + *
> + * List of current shared fences.
> + *
> + * There are no ordering constraints of shared fences against the
> + * exclusive fence slot. If a waiter needs to wait for all access, it
> + * has to wait for both sets of fences to signal.
> + *
> + * A new fence is added by calling dma_resv_add_shared_fence(). Since
> + * this often needs to be done past the point of no return in command
> + * submission it cannot fail, and therefore sufficient slots need to be
> + * reserved by calling dma_resv_reserve_shared().
> + *
> + * Note that actual semantics of what an exclusive or shared fence mean
> + * is defined by the user, for reservation objects shared across drivers
> + * see &dma_buf.resv.
> + */
> struct dma_resv_list __rcu *fence;
> };
>
> @@ -98,6 +172,13 @@ static inline void dma_resv_reset_shared_max(struct dma_resv *obj) {}
> * undefined order, a #ww_acquire_ctx is passed to unwind if a cycle
> * is detected. See ww_mutex_lock() and ww_acquire_init(). A reservation
> * object may be locked by itself by passing NULL as @ctx.
> + *
> + * When a die situation is indicated by returning -EDEADLK all locks held by
> + * @ctx must be unlocked and then dma_resv_lock_slow() called on @obj.
> + *
> + * Unlocked by calling dma_resv_unlock().
> + *
> + * See also dma_resv_lock_interruptible() for the interruptible variant.
> */
> static inline int dma_resv_lock(struct dma_resv *obj,
> struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
> @@ -119,6 +200,12 @@ static inline int dma_resv_lock(struct dma_resv *obj,
> * undefined order, a #ww_acquire_ctx is passed to unwind if a cycle
> * is detected. See ww_mutex_lock() and ww_acquire_init(). A reservation
> * object may be locked by itself by passing NULL as @ctx.
> + *
> + * When a die situation is indicated by returning -EDEADLK all locks held by
> + * @ctx must be unlocked and then dma_resv_lock_slow_interruptible() called on
> + * @obj.
> + *
> + * Unlocked by calling dma_resv_unlock().
> */
> static inline int dma_resv_lock_interruptible(struct dma_resv *obj,
> struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
> @@ -134,6 +221,8 @@ static inline int dma_resv_lock_interruptible(struct dma_resv *obj,
> * Acquires the reservation object after a die case. This function
> * will sleep until the lock becomes available. See dma_resv_lock() as
> * well.
> + *
> + * See also dma_resv_lock_slow_interruptible() for the interruptible variant.
> */
> static inline void dma_resv_lock_slow(struct dma_resv *obj,
> struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
> @@ -167,7 +256,7 @@ static inline int dma_resv_lock_slow_interruptible(struct dma_resv *obj,
> * if they overlap with a writer.
> *
> * Also note that since no context is provided, no deadlock protection is
> - * possible.
> + * possible, which is also not needed for a trylock.
> *
> * Returns true if the lock was acquired, false otherwise.
> */
> @@ -193,6 +282,11 @@ static inline bool dma_resv_is_locked(struct dma_resv *obj)
> *
> * Returns the context used to lock a reservation object or NULL if no context
> * was used or the object is not locked at all.
> + *
> + * WARNING: This interface is pretty horrible, but TTM needs it because it
> + * doesn't pass the struct ww_acquire_ctx around in some very long callchains.
> + * Everyone else just uses it to check whether they're holding a reservation or
> + * not.
> */
> static inline struct ww_acquire_ctx *dma_resv_locking_ctx(struct dma_resv *obj)
> {
> --
> 2.32.0
>

--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation