From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: "Souza, Jose" <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/14] drm/i915: Get rid of the "sizes are 0 based" stuff
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 13:56:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yai0WiYIRLA/qJw7@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <be4aff86415959904384e811f0f9e894c52b84fb.camel@intel.com>
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 05:18:54PM +0000, Souza, Jose wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-12-01 at 17:25 +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > Replace the "sizes are 0 based" stuff with just straight
> > up -1 where needed. Less confusing all around.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sprite.c | 26 ++++---------------
> > .../drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c | 6 +----
> > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sprite.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sprite.c
> > index 1b99a9501a45..2067a7bca4a8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sprite.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sprite.c
> > @@ -431,10 +431,6 @@ vlv_sprite_update_noarm(struct intel_plane *plane,
> > u32 crtc_h = drm_rect_height(&plane_state->uapi.dst);
> > unsigned long irqflags;
> >
> > - /* Sizes are 0 based */
>
> In my opinion at least this comment should stay, helps understand why the -1.
It's just normal practice for almost all such registers.
We don't have similar comments elsewhere either. Also if
the code already says "foo-1" then I don't see what extra
the comment gets you.
>
> > - crtc_w--;
> > - crtc_h--;
> > -
> > spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->uncore.lock, irqflags);
> >
> > intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, SPSTRIDE(pipe, plane_id),
> > @@ -442,7 +438,7 @@ vlv_sprite_update_noarm(struct intel_plane *plane,
> > intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, SPPOS(pipe, plane_id),
> > (crtc_y << 16) | crtc_x);
> > intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, SPSIZE(pipe, plane_id),
> > - (crtc_h << 16) | crtc_w);
> > + ((crtc_h - 1) << 16) | (crtc_w - 1));
> >
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->uncore.lock, irqflags);
> > }
> > @@ -866,21 +862,15 @@ ivb_sprite_update_noarm(struct intel_plane *plane,
> > u32 sprscale = 0;
> > unsigned long irqflags;
> >
> > - /* Sizes are 0 based */
> > - src_w--;
> > - src_h--;
> > - crtc_w--;
> > - crtc_h--;
> > -
> > if (crtc_w != src_w || crtc_h != src_h)
> > - sprscale = SPRITE_SCALE_ENABLE | (src_w << 16) | src_h;
> > + sprscale = SPRITE_SCALE_ENABLE | ((src_w - 1) << 16) | (src_h - 1);
> >
> > spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->uncore.lock, irqflags);
> >
> > intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, SPRSTRIDE(pipe),
> > plane_state->view.color_plane[0].mapping_stride);
> > intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, SPRPOS(pipe), (crtc_y << 16) | crtc_x);
> > - intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, SPRSIZE(pipe), (crtc_h << 16) | crtc_w);
> > + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, SPRSIZE(pipe), ((crtc_h - 1) << 16) | (crtc_w - 1));
> > if (IS_IVYBRIDGE(dev_priv))
> > intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, SPRSCALE(pipe), sprscale);
> >
> > @@ -1208,21 +1198,15 @@ g4x_sprite_update_noarm(struct intel_plane *plane,
> > u32 dvsscale = 0;
> > unsigned long irqflags;
> >
> > - /* Sizes are 0 based */
> > - src_w--;
> > - src_h--;
> > - crtc_w--;
> > - crtc_h--;
> > -
> > if (crtc_w != src_w || crtc_h != src_h)
> > - dvsscale = DVS_SCALE_ENABLE | (src_w << 16) | src_h;
> > + dvsscale = DVS_SCALE_ENABLE | ((src_w - 1) << 16) | (src_h - 1);
> >
> > spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->uncore.lock, irqflags);
> >
> > intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, DVSSTRIDE(pipe),
> > plane_state->view.color_plane[0].mapping_stride);
> > intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, DVSPOS(pipe), (crtc_y << 16) | crtc_x);
> > - intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, DVSSIZE(pipe), (crtc_h << 16) | crtc_w);
> > + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, DVSSIZE(pipe), ((crtc_h - 1) << 16) | (crtc_w - 1));
> > intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, DVSSCALE(pipe), dvsscale);
> >
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->uncore.lock, irqflags);
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c
> > index 9ff24a0e79b4..09948922016b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c
> > @@ -1022,10 +1022,6 @@ skl_program_plane_noarm(struct intel_plane *plane,
> > u32 src_h = drm_rect_height(&plane_state->uapi.src) >> 16;
> > unsigned long irqflags;
> >
> > - /* Sizes are 0 based */
> > - src_w--;
> > - src_h--;
> > -
> > /* The scaler will handle the output position */
> > if (plane_state->scaler_id >= 0) {
> > crtc_x = 0;
> > @@ -1045,7 +1041,7 @@ skl_program_plane_noarm(struct intel_plane *plane,
> > intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, PLANE_POS(pipe, plane_id),
> > (crtc_y << 16) | crtc_x);
> > intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, PLANE_SIZE(pipe, plane_id),
> > - (src_h << 16) | src_w);
> > + ((src_h - 1) << 16) | (src_w - 1));
> >
> > if (intel_fb_is_rc_ccs_cc_modifier(fb->modifier)) {
> > intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, PLANE_CC_VAL(pipe, plane_id, 0),
>
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-02 11:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-01 15:25 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/14] drm/i915: Plane register cleanup Ville Syrjala
2021-12-01 15:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/14] drm/i915: Get rid of the 64bit PLANE_CC_VAL mmio Ville Syrjala
2021-12-01 17:13 ` Souza, Jose
2021-12-01 15:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/14] drm/i915: Rename plane YUV order bits Ville Syrjala
2021-12-01 17:14 ` Souza, Jose
2021-12-02 11:53 ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-12-01 15:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/14] drm/i915: Get rid of the "sizes are 0 based" stuff Ville Syrjala
2021-12-01 17:18 ` Souza, Jose
2021-12-02 11:56 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2021-12-03 13:40 ` Souza, Jose
2021-12-01 15:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/14] drm/i915: Sipmplify PLANE_STRIDE masking Ville Syrjala
2022-01-12 19:50 ` Souza, Jose
2021-12-01 15:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/14] drm/i915: Rename PLANE_CUS_CTL Y plane bits Ville Syrjala
2021-12-01 17:17 ` Souza, Jose
2021-12-01 15:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/14] drm/i915: Use REG_BIT() & co. for universal " Ville Syrjala
2021-12-01 17:26 ` Souza, Jose
2021-12-02 11:57 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-01-12 19:52 ` Souza, Jose
2021-12-06 15:57 ` kernel test robot
2021-12-01 15:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/14] drm/i915: Clean up pre-skl primary plane registers Ville Syrjala
2021-12-06 19:22 ` kernel test robot
2022-01-12 20:12 ` Souza, Jose
2022-01-18 0:55 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-01-18 13:40 ` Souza, Jose
2022-01-18 16:27 ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-12-01 15:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/14] drm/i915: Clean up ivb+ sprite " Ville Syrjala
2022-01-14 16:26 ` Souza, Jose
2021-12-01 15:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/14] drm/i915: Clean up vlv/chv " Ville Syrjala
2022-01-14 16:34 ` Souza, Jose
2022-01-18 1:11 ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-12-01 15:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/14] drm/i915: Clean up g4x+ " Ville Syrjala
2022-01-14 16:38 ` Souza, Jose
2021-12-01 15:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/14] drm/i915: Clean up cursor registers Ville Syrjala
2022-01-14 16:45 ` Souza, Jose
2021-12-01 15:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/14] drm/i915: Extract skl_plane_aux_dist() Ville Syrjala
2021-12-01 17:28 ` Souza, Jose
2021-12-01 15:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/14] drm/i915: Declutter color key register stuff Ville Syrjala
2021-12-01 17:31 ` Souza, Jose
2021-12-01 15:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/14] drm/i915: Nuke pointless middle men for skl+ plane programming Ville Syrjala
2021-12-01 17:32 ` Souza, Jose
2021-12-01 18:47 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Plane register cleanup Patchwork
2021-12-01 18:48 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-12-01 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-12-02 1:57 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yai0WiYIRLA/qJw7@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jose.souza@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox