From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, jani.saarinen@intel.co
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Don't allocate extra ddb during async flip for DG2
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 12:03:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yanrfe7qJARD4Shd@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211203094041.18399-4-stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 11:40:41AM +0200, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> In terms of async flip optimization we don't to allocate
> extra ddb space, so lets skip it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index 0b45d1d61d0f..e1594f43bb1b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -5245,9 +5245,15 @@ skl_allocate_plane_ddb(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> break;
>
> rate = crtc_state->plane_data_rate[plane_id];
> - extra = min_t(u16, alloc_size,
> - DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP(alloc_size * rate,
> - total_data_rate));
> +
> + if (IS_DG2(dev_priv) && crtc_state->uapi.async_flip) {
We should have a sensible function for this.
> + extra = 0;
Aren't we going to get the WARN(alloc_size != 0) if this
is the only enabled plane?
> + } else {
> + extra = min_t(u16, alloc_size,
> + DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP(alloc_size * rate,
> + total_data_rate));
> + }
> +
> total[plane_id] = wm->wm[level].min_ddb_alloc + extra;
> alloc_size -= extra;
> total_data_rate -= rate;
> @@ -5256,9 +5262,15 @@ skl_allocate_plane_ddb(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> break;
>
> rate = crtc_state->uv_plane_data_rate[plane_id];
> - extra = min_t(u16, alloc_size,
> - DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP(alloc_size * rate,
> - total_data_rate));
> +
> + if (IS_DG2(dev_priv) && crtc_state->uapi.async_flip) {
> + extra = 0;
> + } else {
> + extra = min_t(u16, alloc_size,
> + DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP(alloc_size * rate,
> + total_data_rate));
> + }
> +
> uv_total[plane_id] = wm->uv_wm[level].min_ddb_alloc + extra;
> alloc_size -= extra;
> total_data_rate -= rate;
> --
> 2.24.1.485.gad05a3d8e5
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-03 10:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-03 9:40 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: Pass plane id to watermark calculation functions Stanislav Lisovskiy
2021-12-03 9:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: Introduce do_async_flip flag to intel_plane_state Stanislav Lisovskiy
2021-12-03 9:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: Use wm0 only during async flips for DG2 Stanislav Lisovskiy
2021-12-03 10:00 ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-12-03 10:14 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2021-12-03 9:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Don't allocate extra ddb during async flip " Stanislav Lisovskiy
2021-12-03 10:03 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2021-12-03 10:17 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2021-12-03 13:39 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for series starting with [1/4] drm/i915: Pass plane id to watermark calculation functions Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-12-07 11:07 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: Pass plane " Stanislav Lisovskiy
2021-12-07 11:07 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Don't allocate extra ddb during async flip for DG2 Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-01-18 10:48 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4] Async flip optimization " Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-01-18 10:48 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Don't allocate extra ddb during async flip " Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-01-19 11:59 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-01-21 8:06 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4] Async flip optimization " Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-01-21 8:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Don't allocate extra ddb during async flip " Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-01-21 12:06 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-01-23 20:34 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2022-01-24 7:42 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-01-24 9:06 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4] Async flip optimization " Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-01-24 9:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Don't allocate extra ddb during async flip " Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-01-24 9:16 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-01-24 9:29 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2022-01-24 9:51 ` Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-01-24 10:32 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-01-24 13:52 ` Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-01-24 18:55 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-01-25 11:36 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yanrfe7qJARD4Shd@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.saarinen@intel.co \
--cc=stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).