intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: Pass plane to watermark calculation functions
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 13:26:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yef1fdow2p1fVdbr@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220118104839.6654-2-stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>

On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 12:48:36PM +0200, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> Sometimes we might need to change the way we calculate
> watermarks, based on which particular plane it is calculated
> for. Thus it would be convenient to pass plane struct to those
> functions.
> 
> v2: Pass plane instead of plane_id
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
> ---
>  .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.c |  2 +-
>  .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.h |  3 +++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c               | 23 +++++++++++++------
>  3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.c
> index c2c512cd8ec0..d1344e9c06de 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.c
> @@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ int intel_plane_atomic_check_with_state(const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_
>  					       old_plane_state, new_plane_state);
>  }
>  
> -static struct intel_plane *
> +struct intel_plane *
>  intel_crtc_get_plane(struct intel_crtc *crtc, enum plane_id plane_id)
>  {
>  	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.h
> index 7907f601598e..c1499bb7370e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.h
> @@ -16,10 +16,13 @@ struct intel_crtc;
>  struct intel_crtc_state;
>  struct intel_plane;
>  struct intel_plane_state;
> +enum plane_id;
>  
>  unsigned int intel_adjusted_rate(const struct drm_rect *src,
>  				 const struct drm_rect *dst,
>  				 unsigned int rate);
> +struct intel_plane *intel_crtc_get_plane(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> +					 enum plane_id plane_id);
>  unsigned int intel_plane_pixel_rate(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  				    const struct intel_plane_state *plane_state);
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index 62fde21fac39..dc1203d21c46 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -4252,7 +4252,9 @@ static int skl_compute_wm_params(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  				 u64 modifier, unsigned int rotation,
>  				 u32 plane_pixel_rate, struct skl_wm_params *wp,
>  				 int color_plane);
> +
>  static void skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> +				 const struct intel_plane *plane,
>  				 int level,
>  				 unsigned int latency,
>  				 const struct skl_wm_params *wp,
> @@ -4261,6 +4263,7 @@ static void skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  
>  static unsigned int
>  skl_cursor_allocation(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> +		      const struct intel_plane *plane,

I don't see a reason for having the caller pass this in. We can just
keep it local to this function.

Also we don't usually const these things.

>  		      int num_active)
>  {
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc_state->uapi.crtc->dev);
> @@ -4279,7 +4282,7 @@ skl_cursor_allocation(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  	for (level = 0; level <= max_level; level++) {
>  		unsigned int latency = dev_priv->wm.skl_latency[level];
>  
> -		skl_compute_plane_wm(crtc_state, level, latency, &wp, &wm, &wm);
> +		skl_compute_plane_wm(crtc_state, plane, level, latency, &wp, &wm, &wm);
>  		if (wm.min_ddb_alloc == U16_MAX)
>  			break;
>  
> @@ -5124,6 +5127,7 @@ skl_allocate_plane_ddb(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  		intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, crtc);
>  	const struct intel_dbuf_state *dbuf_state =
>  		intel_atomic_get_new_dbuf_state(state);
> +	const struct intel_plane *cursor_plane = intel_crtc_get_plane(crtc, PLANE_CURSOR);

Could be just to_intel_plane(crtc->base.cursor) 

Apart from that looks OK.

>  	const struct skl_ddb_entry *alloc = &dbuf_state->ddb[crtc->pipe];
>  	int num_active = hweight8(dbuf_state->active_pipes);
>  	u16 alloc_size, start = 0;
> @@ -5153,7 +5157,7 @@ skl_allocate_plane_ddb(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	/* Allocate fixed number of blocks for cursor. */
> -	total[PLANE_CURSOR] = skl_cursor_allocation(crtc_state, num_active);
> +	total[PLANE_CURSOR] = skl_cursor_allocation(crtc_state, cursor_plane, num_active);
>  	alloc_size -= total[PLANE_CURSOR];
>  	crtc_state->wm.skl.plane_ddb_y[PLANE_CURSOR].start =
>  		alloc->end - total[PLANE_CURSOR];
> @@ -5507,6 +5511,7 @@ static int skl_wm_max_lines(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  }
>  
>  static void skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> +				 const struct intel_plane *plane,
>  				 int level,
>  				 unsigned int latency,
>  				 const struct skl_wm_params *wp,
> @@ -5634,6 +5639,7 @@ static void skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  
>  static void
>  skl_compute_wm_levels(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> +		      const struct intel_plane *plane,
>  		      const struct skl_wm_params *wm_params,
>  		      struct skl_wm_level *levels)
>  {
> @@ -5645,7 +5651,7 @@ skl_compute_wm_levels(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  		struct skl_wm_level *result = &levels[level];
>  		unsigned int latency = dev_priv->wm.skl_latency[level];
>  
> -		skl_compute_plane_wm(crtc_state, level, latency,
> +		skl_compute_plane_wm(crtc_state, plane, level, latency,
>  				     wm_params, result_prev, result);
>  
>  		result_prev = result;
> @@ -5653,6 +5659,7 @@ skl_compute_wm_levels(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  }
>  
>  static void tgl_compute_sagv_wm(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> +				const struct intel_plane *plane,
>  				const struct skl_wm_params *wm_params,
>  				struct skl_plane_wm *plane_wm)
>  {
> @@ -5661,7 +5668,7 @@ static void tgl_compute_sagv_wm(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  	struct skl_wm_level *levels = plane_wm->wm;
>  	unsigned int latency = dev_priv->wm.skl_latency[0] + dev_priv->sagv_block_time_us;
>  
> -	skl_compute_plane_wm(crtc_state, 0, latency,
> +	skl_compute_plane_wm(crtc_state, plane, 0, latency,
>  			     wm_params, &levels[0],
>  			     sagv_wm);
>  }
> @@ -5736,6 +5743,7 @@ static int skl_build_plane_wm_single(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  	struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
>  	struct skl_plane_wm *wm = &crtc_state->wm.skl.raw.planes[plane_id];
> +	struct intel_plane *plane = to_intel_plane(plane_state->uapi.plane);
>  	struct skl_wm_params wm_params;
>  	int ret;
>  
> @@ -5744,13 +5752,13 @@ static int skl_build_plane_wm_single(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> -	skl_compute_wm_levels(crtc_state, &wm_params, wm->wm);
> +	skl_compute_wm_levels(crtc_state, plane, &wm_params, wm->wm);
>  
>  	skl_compute_transition_wm(dev_priv, &wm->trans_wm,
>  				  &wm->wm[0], &wm_params);
>  
>  	if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12) {
> -		tgl_compute_sagv_wm(crtc_state, &wm_params, wm);
> +		tgl_compute_sagv_wm(crtc_state, plane, &wm_params, wm);
>  
>  		skl_compute_transition_wm(dev_priv, &wm->sagv.trans_wm,
>  					  &wm->sagv.wm0, &wm_params);
> @@ -5764,6 +5772,7 @@ static int skl_build_plane_wm_uv(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  				 enum plane_id plane_id)
>  {
>  	struct skl_plane_wm *wm = &crtc_state->wm.skl.raw.planes[plane_id];
> +	struct intel_plane *plane = to_intel_plane(plane_state->uapi.plane);
>  	struct skl_wm_params wm_params;
>  	int ret;
>  
> @@ -5775,7 +5784,7 @@ static int skl_build_plane_wm_uv(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> -	skl_compute_wm_levels(crtc_state, &wm_params, wm->uv_wm);
> +	skl_compute_wm_levels(crtc_state, plane, &wm_params, wm->uv_wm);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> -- 
> 2.24.1.485.gad05a3d8e5

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-19 11:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-18 10:48 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4] Async flip optimization for DG2 Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-01-18 10:48 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: Pass plane to watermark calculation functions Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-01-19 11:26   ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2022-01-18 10:48 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: Introduce do_async_flip flag to intel_plane_state Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-01-19 11:35   ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-01-18 10:48 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: Use wm0 only during async flips for DG2 Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-01-19 11:51   ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-01-18 10:48 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Don't allocate extra ddb during async flip " Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-01-19 11:59   ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-01-18 12:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Async flip optimization " Patchwork
2022-01-18 12:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-01-18 13:03 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2022-01-18 14:00 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Async flip optimization for DG2 (rev2) Patchwork
2022-01-18 14:01 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-01-18 14:27 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-01-18 16:55 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-01-24  9:06 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4] Async flip optimization for DG2 Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-01-24  9:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: Pass plane to watermark calculation functions Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-01-25 15:45   ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-01-21  8:06 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4] Async flip optimization for DG2 Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-01-21  8:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: Pass plane to watermark calculation functions Stanislav Lisovskiy
2022-01-21 11:47   ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-12-07 11:07 Stanislav Lisovskiy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yef1fdow2p1fVdbr@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).