From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37AF3C433F5 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 10:29:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F12C10E158; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 10:29:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A8E810E956 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 10:29:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1645093748; x=1676629748; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=5QpJkJ1FFQ5cvE46tUL1IG5MC61FezyDXbT57gDYGwk=; b=i3/2d9GNsS4VSyZI94I/XYL+LGpx/cakUBXW9UpkM4JnksoyIuS7SwQ7 dnUyTiSH89+aqPv7bk45D+DSWu66HgNRfnh31PWscSdP4G/fe/HetbNsQ UB/lhYb0HXQEpUcGjY7Gamkv3Y0XPqW4p8f5FLaXHqV/ljvE+0WdUTIgK zybWsvhpAEkfM2WAqypqi5/p4WpysIkRZu3p4BRtbnm1lyEVoL43PNWFn 2q3virqzaUzOXygxhKCJCXAdBdRqIw+xb7LS8oe86uXRbdKUsf5xq9vdZ qnnz18fR1vOB60XKe9cMchZMeoA3wo5Orb1BJsel/JfU4BWzm7jYhUog9 g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10260"; a="248441337" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,375,1635231600"; d="scan'208";a="248441337" Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Feb 2022 02:29:07 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,375,1635231600"; d="scan'208";a="571740351" Received: from stinkpipe.fi.intel.com (HELO stinkbox) ([10.237.72.151]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with SMTP; 17 Feb 2022 02:29:05 -0800 Received: by stinkbox (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 17 Feb 2022 12:29:04 +0200 Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 12:29:04 +0200 From: Ville =?iso-8859-1?Q?Syrj=E4l=E4?= To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Message-ID: References: <20220215183208.6143-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> <164505996499.18050.13429344508225280466@emeril.freedesktop.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <164505996499.18050.13429344508225280466@emeril.freedesktop.org> X-Patchwork-Hint: comment Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] =?utf-8?b?4pyXIEZpLkNJLkJBVDogZmFpbHVyZSBmb3IgZHJt?= =?utf-8?q?/i915=3A_Move_bigjoiner_refactoring?= X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 01:06:04AM -0000, Patchwork wrote: > == Series Details == > > Series: drm/i915: Move bigjoiner refactoring > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/100195/ > State : failure > > == Summary == > > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_11238 -> Patchwork_22286 > ==================================================== > > Summary > ------- > > **FAILURE** > > Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_22286 absolutely need to be > verified manually. > > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes > introduced in Patchwork_22286, please notify your bug team to allow them > to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI. > > External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22286/index.html > > Participating hosts (46 -> 44) > ------------------------------ > > Additional (1): fi-pnv-d510 > Missing (3): fi-bsw-cyan bat-jsl-2 shard-tglu > > Possible new issues > ------------------- > > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_22286: > > ### IGT changes ### > > #### Possible regressions #### > > * igt@kms_force_connector_basic@force-load-detect: > - fi-hsw-4770: [PASS][1] -> [FAIL][2] Grr. This one is a real issue. Sort of regression from the original bigjoiner patches, but only clearly exposed by this pipesrc rect stuff. More fixes incoming... -- Ville Syrjälä Intel