From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/12] drm/edid: add typedef for block read function
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 15:06:11 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yk7Ts/ejETyarJSh@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <94e414efe8d127f3fd0b4fd7948aafbe7be079a9.1649322799.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>
On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 12:14:32PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Make the callback a bit easier on the eye.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> index ba54701f91f6..926ffe5cd97e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> @@ -2037,10 +2037,11 @@ int drm_add_override_edid_modes(struct drm_connector *connector)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_add_override_edid_modes);
>
> +typedef int read_block_fn(void *context, u8 *buf, unsigned int block, size_t len);
> +
The header still has the eyesore. Maybe we want to put the typedef
there?
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> static struct edid *drm_do_get_edid_base_block(struct drm_connector *connector,
> - int (*get_edid_block)(void *data, u8 *buf, unsigned int block,
> - size_t len),
> - void *data)
> + read_block_fn read_block,
> + void *context)
> {
> int *null_edid_counter = connector ? &connector->null_edid_counter : NULL;
> bool *edid_corrupt = connector ? &connector->edid_corrupt : NULL;
> @@ -2053,7 +2054,7 @@ static struct edid *drm_do_get_edid_base_block(struct drm_connector *connector,
>
> /* base block fetch */
> for (try = 0; try < 4; try++) {
> - if (get_edid_block(data, edid, 0, EDID_LENGTH))
> + if (read_block(context, edid, 0, EDID_LENGTH))
> goto out;
> if (drm_edid_block_valid(edid, 0, false, edid_corrupt))
> break;
> @@ -2097,9 +2098,8 @@ static struct edid *drm_do_get_edid_base_block(struct drm_connector *connector,
> * Return: Pointer to valid EDID or NULL if we couldn't find any.
> */
> struct edid *drm_do_get_edid(struct drm_connector *connector,
> - int (*get_edid_block)(void *data, u8 *buf, unsigned int block,
> - size_t len),
> - void *data)
> + read_block_fn read_block,
> + void *context)
> {
> int j, invalid_blocks = 0;
> struct edid *edid, *new, *override;
> @@ -2108,7 +2108,7 @@ struct edid *drm_do_get_edid(struct drm_connector *connector,
> if (override)
> return override;
>
> - edid = drm_do_get_edid_base_block(connector, get_edid_block, data);
> + edid = drm_do_get_edid_base_block(connector, read_block, context);
> if (!edid)
> return NULL;
>
> @@ -2125,7 +2125,7 @@ struct edid *drm_do_get_edid(struct drm_connector *connector,
> int try;
>
> for (try = 0; try < 4; try++) {
> - if (get_edid_block(data, block, j, EDID_LENGTH))
> + if (read_block(context, block, j, EDID_LENGTH))
> goto out;
> if (drm_edid_block_valid(block, j, false, NULL))
> break;
> --
> 2.30.2
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-07 12:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-07 9:14 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/12] drm/edid: low level EDID block read refactoring etc Jani Nikula
2022-04-07 9:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/12] drm/edid: convert edid_is_zero() to edid_block_is_zero() for blocks Jani Nikula
2022-04-07 9:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/12] drm/edid: have edid_block_check() detect blocks that are all zero Jani Nikula
2022-04-07 9:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/12] drm/edid: refactor EDID block status printing Jani Nikula
2022-04-07 11:54 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-04-11 9:49 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-07 9:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/12] drm/edid: add a helper to log dump an EDID block Jani Nikula
2022-04-07 9:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/12] drm/edid: pass struct edid to connector_bad_edid() Jani Nikula
2022-04-07 11:56 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-04-07 9:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/12] drm/edid: add typedef for block read function Jani Nikula
2022-04-07 12:06 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2022-04-11 9:48 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-07 9:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/12] drm/edid: abstract an EDID block read helper Jani Nikula
2022-04-07 9:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/12] drm/edid: use EDID block read helper in drm_do_get_edid() Jani Nikula
2022-04-07 9:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/12] drm/edid: convert extension block read to EDID block read helper Jani Nikula
2022-04-07 9:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/12] drm/edid: drop extra local var Jani Nikula
2022-04-07 9:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/12] drm/edid: add single point of return to drm_do_get_edid() Jani Nikula
2022-04-07 9:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/12] drm/edid: add EDID block count and size helpers Jani Nikula
2022-04-07 15:07 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] " Jani Nikula
2022-04-07 12:24 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/edid: low level EDID block read refactoring etc Patchwork
2022-04-07 12:41 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-07 12:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/12] " Ville Syrjälä
2022-04-11 9:51 ` Jani Nikula
2022-04-07 17:43 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/edid: low level EDID block read refactoring etc. (rev2) Patchwork
2022-04-07 23:17 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/edid: low level EDID block read refactoring etc. (rev3) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yk7Ts/ejETyarJSh@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox