From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A99CC28B20 for ; Wed, 2 Apr 2025 15:00:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C44410E802; Wed, 2 Apr 2025 15:00:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: gabe.freedesktop.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="B36CqMtm"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.10]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4341E10E80B; Wed, 2 Apr 2025 15:00:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1743606053; x=1775142053; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=ppJaE6TgO2ja6Y4YcYKHhkhqpuZJN2aU6PI0O8Jks/g=; b=B36CqMtmNB981tBAOwn6YaT1XtxWgB9goDUfVKcjL7RuG/gvufpaeBOJ q8tDk2bwKOnsKF74n/35do12xcq80PIE0AnCugHMyx+Ns/v/CPjAY6CWn TfczHp+l73sXqQk0WvmgK27TSHrqw0VbKbtr9z023aR5WOrO8MSh0L2Tm J6nE8Jlm9Yc4TxSihKcNBXBwNuMYsOQlfMmQ1xU/fDGG8HsSGRCs+xf2I gMl5ba6FsbNhp0fivWAQiiEvrhfvruOogT4twyK08BlBXsxFyz7XiYVR0 dQyUeZXDu7UNOwaNhuj4LfJg7VlnQiWjzycseDMi+0ddfdlHZnFNAv4KG A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: +0HqwWsQTCOUBpCGzcvM1g== X-CSE-MsgGUID: MnxpeXSMS9KWTACzaBWYEQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11392"; a="62377375" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,182,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="62377375" Received: from orviesa005.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.145]) by orvoesa102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Apr 2025 08:00:53 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: w3PjeQrlRbCatimpOxQILQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 2Xr09KNUSK+RGjQ4m7fGJw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,182,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="131919467" Received: from stinkpipe.fi.intel.com (HELO stinkbox) ([10.237.72.74]) by orviesa005.jf.intel.com with SMTP; 02 Apr 2025 08:00:51 -0700 Received: by stinkbox (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 02 Apr 2025 18:00:50 +0300 Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2025 18:00:50 +0300 From: Ville =?iso-8859-1?Q?Syrj=E4l=E4?= To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: I915-ci-infra@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: =?utf-8?B?4pyXIGk5MTUuQ0kuRnVsbA==?= =?utf-8?Q?=3A?= failure for drm/i915: Precompute plane SURF address/etc. Message-ID: References: <20250402002209.24987-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> <174356840050.25661.7739072322248133579@e6b6f09ec485> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <174356840050.25661.7739072322248133579@e6b6f09ec485> X-Patchwork-Hint: comment X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 04:33:20AM -0000, Patchwork wrote: > == Series Details == > > Series: drm/i915: Precompute plane SURF address/etc. > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/147097/ > State : failure > > == Summary == > > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_16361_full -> Patchwork_147097v1_full > ==================================================== > > Summary > ------- > > **FAILURE** > > Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_147097v1_full absolutely need to be > verified manually. > > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes > introduced in Patchwork_147097v1_full, please notify your bug team (I915-ci-infra@lists.freedesktop.org) to allow them > to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI. > > > > Participating hosts (10 -> 10) > ------------------------------ > > No changes in participating hosts > > Possible new issues > ------------------- > > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_147097v1_full: > > ### IGT changes ### > > #### Possible regressions #### > > * igt@kms_color@ctm-max@pipe-a-hdmi-a-1: > - shard-snb: [PASS][1] -> [ABORT][2] +17 other tests abort > [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_16361/shard-snb2/igt@kms_color@ctm-max@pipe-a-hdmi-a-1.html > [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_147097v1/shard-snb5/igt@kms_color@ctm-max@pipe-a-hdmi-a-1.html Apparently I forgot that we can't do the *_ctl_crtc() stuff so early as crtc_state->gamma_enable & co. haven't been computed yet. I think I still want to clean up the ->ctl stuff, but I probably need to add a new plane vfunc for this. And I think I might take that opportunity to move some of plane related details from intel_color_add_affected_planes() into the plane code proper. For now I'll probably repost the first six patches as a separate series since all that should be completely fine as is. What's also slightly troubling about these CI results is that GLK didn't catch anything, despite the potential to use a stale PLANE_COLOR_CTL. And presumable SNB only caught stuff becasue the state checker noticed the stale DSPCNTR, but the tests didn't. So seems like we are somehow missing tests that would change gamma_mode & co. without touching the plane... > > * igt@kms_color@ctm-max@pipe-b-hdmi-a-1: > - shard-snb: [PASS][3] -> [DMESG-WARN][4] +3 other tests dmesg-warn > [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_16361/shard-snb2/igt@kms_color@ctm-max@pipe-b-hdmi-a-1.html > [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_147097v1/shard-snb5/igt@kms_color@ctm-max@pipe-b-hdmi-a-1.html CI folks, why is this reported as 'dmesg-warn' vs. the previous test was 'abort' even though both tests failed in the same exact way (state checker WARN)? -- Ville Syrjälä Intel