From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EA11E77188 for ; Tue, 24 Dec 2024 11:19:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A195110E447; Tue, 24 Dec 2024 11:19:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: gabe.freedesktop.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Nh3xaNG6"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.19]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB68A10E447 for ; Tue, 24 Dec 2024 11:19:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1735039143; x=1766575143; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=2rhVynXI4znjG4hXdcpNKK45Mhq8rtjDRs8Ez7UYcEA=; b=Nh3xaNG6qsHTCtmLhszsVSpqUYznlBy5dRzHWJuhbAEBUxAqIESriKTu YuthfpRNZBtL8lvKKtxOnMSPlKOjc+6y2ifyXlZPkzbHxlU5pI3pCONSE q3mQF+G1wAtPrHDXR/ol4gckdK2lgO9qF+9TwEbhZhkKBdHxRvbQGjdB3 FbiXvFMgd4hONqnIbCbI1h5blrZHi7rCwUu+N3MX5XKD6masNvzvH0C+h wnWYaKTFdxPd0Nl3lPLNyJcXV1HY0oqPphAa9VH4Ug1nD6D57mFLOMspu /5geAOkyyhC6yaUBLmM3oRD/GKlCsgHAxy5BluEo8njCYAm3Pa8Hp6V2B Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: bZmVYgiURpGxuGMiJD9GbA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: xe21A0zCTFW02R4g5E7nPQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11296"; a="34782669" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,260,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="34782669" Received: from orviesa005.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.145]) by fmvoesa113.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Dec 2024 03:19:02 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: nDgM3obwQji7+vBEkjkm8Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 7pUx3e6oT5ao1B4f2gRn3g== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,224,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="104464186" Received: from black.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.28]) by orviesa005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Dec 2024 03:19:01 -0800 Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2024 13:18:58 +0200 From: Raag Jadav To: Andi Shyti Cc: Andi Shyti , intel-gfx , Sebastian Brzezinka Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2] drm/i915/gt: Log reason for setting TAINT_WARN at reset Message-ID: References: <20241220131714.1309483-1-andi.shyti@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" On Tue, Dec 24, 2024 at 01:04:37PM +0200, Raag Jadav wrote: > On Mon, Dec 23, 2024 at 08:18:46PM +0100, Andi Shyti wrote: > > Hi Sebastian, > > > > On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 02:17:14PM +0100, Andi Shyti wrote: > > > From: Sebastian Brzezinka > > > > > > TAINT_WARN is used to notify CI about non-recoverable failures, which > > > require device to be restarted. In some cases, there is no sufficient > > > information about the reason for the restart. The test runner is just > > > killed, and DUT is rebooted, logging only 'probe with driver i915 failed > > > with error -4' to dmesg. > > > > > > Printing error to dmesg before TAINT_WARN, would explain why the device > > > has been restarted, and what caused the malfunction in the first place. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Brzezinka > > > Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti > > > Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti > > > > it's hard to receive green lights from CI. Anyway, I merged it to > > drm-intel-gt-next since all the failures look completely > > unrelated. > > Side note: You can trigger a re-run from patchwork without resend. Which seems already done here, my bad. Raag