From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA5D9C02198 for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2025 23:07:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91CCD10E211; Mon, 10 Feb 2025 23:07:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: gabe.freedesktop.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="YniOKWZd"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.14]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C041A8926D for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2025 23:07:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1739228861; x=1770764861; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=5Ad+mDP0f4rkKnJARYGaDv1lwZ6hbqhdNqwk2x11ziE=; b=YniOKWZdnVEZsPmFZDJdqF3C1dpHEReZkUcOFYDpk5G5eftMUqFqt5JY 3Z+9FF1K8l8H+9TpyhS6qCa9U0MNHdl55TcQML+zcc7lGP1xP6G6fmlzD c0wWtSYDM4+kf63rs19R4mYEwFxGeOxQpGC00dAS36gCkzNwjFpu3NIRE M8P0DHn6GOTjpf5MqPw2EIt7XZnW8exIWUnoo1Ajq7axj4Zgp3p8kIaXn CuIDXe8ZUM2dRTHIQ43LVeV6wPYhBdyC0Mzv2y8L3q0uNTDSGpJuUsDlt Md02+D3BFhUQkN2C4jgQIMVev8dHMAJJ+REAK/MqyeTbgN50ZVg9YZq2X w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: tEXyPMRWTY2GlAjAe5A2kg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: KrtxsNKMQdayya7ZB0AENg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11341"; a="40099709" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.13,275,1732608000"; d="scan'208";a="40099709" Received: from fmviesa007.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.147]) by fmvoesa108.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Feb 2025 15:07:40 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: W+uTPteqRxaqvriAKsP9+Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Zkib2YFtSS+773YNKGPQMA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.13,275,1732608000"; d="scan'208";a="112303550" Received: from bergbenj-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO intel.com) ([10.245.246.18]) by fmviesa007-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Feb 2025 15:07:38 -0800 Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 00:07:34 +0100 From: Andi Shyti To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Cc: Markus Theil , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu Subject: Re: [PATCH] prandom: remove next_pseudo_random32 Message-ID: References: <20250210133556.66431-1-theil.markus@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" Hi, On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 02:39:43PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > Hey Markus, > > Thanks for this. I hadn't realized that next_pseudo_random32() only > had two users left. Excellent. > > I'll queue this up in the random tree (unless there are objections > from the maintainers of that test code). actually would be better if we apply the i915 part in drm-tip rather than waiting for kernel releases to receive this change in our branch. It has been source of conflicts and headaches. May I ask Markus to split the patch in two parts and we handle the i915 side? Thanks, Andi