From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84B4EC7619A for ; Wed, 5 Apr 2023 13:25:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0333810E95D; Wed, 5 Apr 2023 13:25:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ej1-x634.google.com (mail-ej1-x634.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::634]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF37F10E95D for ; Wed, 5 Apr 2023 13:25:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ej1-x634.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-930bc91df7bso115558166b.1 for ; Wed, 05 Apr 2023 06:25:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ffwll.ch; s=google; t=1680701121; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=CUtULfA5bLZhhAnqEVdsPO4f4/cotKXMpX/rBKrBwCU=; b=I+E9eZK0O0wCuaG3RpVayfgX04qh8RTiRNjffiQYHn0uWhBbKHKxNdeIPxonIxU8ED Qkikb7s817DwN6tIqPLt7G5Lm0Ro1PkGnzdJGnWgPYTrUO/6zV3wAzqCdzS0JWzDCuKR iqXxo30r5oXOhJOTgaZNSkjJWFgk2k4uj5DOk= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1680701121; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=CUtULfA5bLZhhAnqEVdsPO4f4/cotKXMpX/rBKrBwCU=; b=n4H6TYcVJulGjV+JnJPllloFjX4oKVbXez8VNo9hturcBWybuG16BIMUoL0dEEe8jJ c+tph7Kjj7lvMTx8TWRFB01KriaBZwNL+AVS2/L92DlwU5GT/cHRrmqNlBWGWVmlupzG hxCuRN1VtUVCaByiVl+w5QIn6AAkTMOE7NRne+aru56Xo4j51MMyZxPvspgP8J+N8s+F jocuVjDbX22/sWiscy4iFlj8tlDpYDnxwH2LNjRA2M2xfclg6RwbZPFdOYXld/34SYia 31cMmmLnPbuZgxjrIE5I8D4TJaG4mWRpZIG1ef1AoCW6cneNI0t6q0BbSj0PgLKpuHdK womQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9d5aYB6o4VXgugpNYTlZSUvjSht7VVmnGlbOXNawQ16EqsWC3x3 PYMH25Tolm2fX+VyUhPjDcrAFg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350ZsNc/rtqu1NEGe53/lPebNr5LRx0G5RnZDO64RCYwlrsQnnIhn7bHPhGrr/AyAN7Sjecj++g== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2216:b0:947:bff2:1c2d with SMTP id s22-20020a170906221600b00947bff21c2dmr3058456ejs.3.1680701120972; Wed, 05 Apr 2023 06:25:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phenom.ffwll.local (212-51-149-33.fiber7.init7.net. [212.51.149.33]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bv20-20020a170906b1d400b009447277c2aasm7371257ejb.39.2023.04.05.06.25.19 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 05 Apr 2023 06:25:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2023 15:25:18 +0200 From: Daniel Vetter To: Javier Martinez Canillas Message-ID: References: <20230404194038.472803-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> <87h6tud3zc.fsf@minerva.mail-host-address-is-not-set> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87h6tud3zc.fsf@minerva.mail-host-address-is-not-set> X-Operating-System: Linux phenom 6.1.0-7-amd64 Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/fb-helper: set x/yres_virtual in drm_fb_helper_check_var X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Thomas Zimmermann , Daniel Vetter , Intel Graphics Development , syzbot+20dcf81733d43ddff661@syzkaller.appspotmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org, DRI Development , Daniel Vetter , Daniel Vetter Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 12:21:11PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > Daniel Vetter writes: > > > Drivers are supposed to fix this up if needed if they don't outright > > reject it. Uncovered by 6c11df58fd1a ("fbmem: Check virtual screen > > sizes in fb_set_var()"). > > > > Should have a Fixes: tag ? I understand what was uncovered by that commit > but it help distros to figure out if something has to be cherry-picked by > them. So I believe that would be useful to have it. > > The patch looks good to me. The cc: stable should go far enough back for that. Or that was at least my idea ... I can add the Fixes: back since I had it but dropped it intentionally because it's not really a bug in the fbmem patch. -Daniel > Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas > > -- > Best regards, > > Javier Martinez Canillas > Core Platforms > Red Hat > -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch