From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55209C7618E for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2023 12:52:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D7C410E03E; Fri, 21 Apr 2023 12:52:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23B6510E03E for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2023 12:52:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1682081568; x=1713617568; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=soTq20W9Ry/CqZBjvnUe+k9f2DEKFX1N1NIV9q58fGI=; b=gvzfCUS0EK6IBvcrkY9pgakqSJpZarlv8uHdos7+c8lSEWvRI4hQ6YME OKV0nk2SzUGhux2YRsuYD4bOR99TeMr2oqKpByjK2Uomgx5VrMdhJZgcn KZBX1bfGojDYlAUik3pZknv8Yl79NQdgAJea8uH8LzwyvCvKlJj+ENbf1 fBdu0VtXANqoxc94GlIgWRJ1UNER7DvXZp7+0ZmKIdotVTNEzUCG0zqRR 7ytWbVpaGXMmy/fiW9ghy4XVaeZY6IRxFoTDb4G//dEZfmq/bHsHVch6i PI8AYUAq/LtadH28ApBEWuEmXiwAlAoaT+oxg30xvhs6gh6TADWihQ587 g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10686"; a="347884689" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.99,214,1677571200"; d="scan'208";a="347884689" Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Apr 2023 05:52:47 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10686"; a="722733931" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.99,214,1677571200"; d="scan'208";a="722733931" Received: from stinkpipe.fi.intel.com (HELO stinkbox) ([10.237.72.70]) by orsmga008.jf.intel.com with SMTP; 21 Apr 2023 05:52:43 -0700 Received: by stinkbox (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 21 Apr 2023 15:52:43 +0300 Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 15:52:43 +0300 From: Ville =?iso-8859-1?Q?Syrj=E4l=E4?= To: "Lisovskiy, Stanislav" Message-ID: References: <20230421083520.14486-1-stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Patchwork-Hint: comment Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/mtl: Copy c10 phy pll sw state from master to slave for bigjoiner X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 03:43:41PM +0300, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote: > On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 03:19:42PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 02:37:11PM +0300, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 12:26:08PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > > > On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 11:35:20AM +0300, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote: > > > > > We try to verify pll registers in sw state for slave crtc with the hw state. > > > > > However in case of bigjoiner we don't calculate those at all, so this verification > > > > > will then always fail. > > > > > So we should either skip the verification for Bigjoiner slave crtc or copy sw state > > > > > from master crtc. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy > > > > > --- > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 1 + > > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c > > > > > index bf391a6cd8d6..83c98791fea3 100644 > > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c > > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c > > > > > @@ -4556,6 +4556,7 @@ copy_bigjoiner_crtc_state_modeset(struct intel_atomic_state *state, > > > > > drm_mode_copy(&slave_crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode, > > > > > &master_crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode); > > > > > slave_crtc_state->hw.scaling_filter = master_crtc_state->hw.scaling_filter; > > > > > + slave_crtc_state->cx0pll_state = master_crtc_state->cx0pll_state; > > > > > > > > Wrong place. Also we're already copying dpll_hw_state which is in the > > > > same union, and on first blush looks bigger than this thing. So why is > > > > that not working? > > > > > > No we aren't copying it, we are "saving" it earlier, however it doesn't help at all: > > > > > > /* preserve some things from the slave's original crtc state */ > > > saved_state->uapi = slave_crtc_state->uapi; > > > saved_state->scaler_state = slave_crtc_state->scaler_state; > > > saved_state->shared_dpll = slave_crtc_state->shared_dpll; > > > saved_state->dpll_hw_state = slave_crtc_state->dpll_hw_state; > > > > Hmm. How is anything at all working if we keep this around > > from the old state? > > > > Looks like I probably broke this in > > commit 0ff0e219d9b8 ("drm/i915: Compute clocks earlier") > > and somehow no one has noticed. > > > > The correct fix would seem to be to just nuke that > > dpll_hw_state preservation above. > > Need to ask for this machine, where this is reproducible and > check if that helps.. We really need to get joiner tested by regular ci. With adl+ that shouldn't even require any special hw due to the uncompressed joiner. For older hw we need a DSC capable display for bigjoiner (or faking the DSC support and ignoring the fact that you won't actually see anything on the screen). -- Ville Syrjälä Intel