Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 06/10] vfio-iommufd: Add helper to retrieve iommufd_ctx and devid for vfio_device

Alex Williamson
2023-05-18T19:50:40Z

On Thu, 18 May 2023 13:25:59 +0000
"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote:

> > From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2023 2:15 AM
> >
> > On Sat, 13 May 2023 06:21:32 -0700
> > Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > This is needed by the vfio-pci driver to report affected devices in the
> > > hot reset for a given device.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > drivers/vfio/iommufd.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > > include/linux/iommufd.h | 6 ++++++
> > > include/linux/vfio.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > > 4 files changed, 64 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c
> > > index 4f9b2142274c..81466b97023f 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c
> > > @@ -116,6 +116,18 @@ void iommufd_device_unbind(struct iommufd_device *idev)
> > > }
> > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(iommufd_device_unbind, IOMMUFD);
> > >
> > > +struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd_device_to_ictx(struct iommufd_device *idev)
> > > +{
> > > + return idev->ictx;
> > > +}
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(iommufd_device_to_ictx, IOMMUFD);
> > > +
> > > +u32 iommufd_device_to_id(struct iommufd_device *idev)
> > > +{
> > > + return idev->obj.id;
> > > +}
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(iommufd_device_to_id, IOMMUFD);
> > > +
> > > static int iommufd_device_setup_msi(struct iommufd_device *idev,
> > > struct iommufd_hw_pagetable *hwpt,
> > > phys_addr_t sw_msi_start)
> > > @@ -463,6 +475,18 @@ void iommufd_access_destroy(struct iommufd_access
> > *access)
> > > }
> > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(iommufd_access_destroy, IOMMUFD);
> > >
> > > +struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd_access_to_ictx(struct iommufd_access *access)
> > > +{
> > > + return access->ictx;
> > > +}
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(iommufd_access_to_ictx, IOMMUFD);
> > > +
> > > +u32 iommufd_access_to_id(struct iommufd_access *access)
> > > +{
> > > + return access->obj.id;
> > > +}
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(iommufd_access_to_id, IOMMUFD);
> > > +
> > > int iommufd_access_attach(struct iommufd_access *access, u32 ioas_id)
> > > {
> > > struct iommufd_ioas *new_ioas;
> > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c b/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> > > index c1379e826052..a18e920be164 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> > > @@ -105,6 +105,26 @@ void vfio_iommufd_unbind(struct vfio_device *vdev)
> > > vdev->ops->unbind_iommufd(vdev);
> > > }
> > >
> > > +struct iommufd_ctx *vfio_iommufd_physical_ictx(struct vfio_device *vdev)
> > > +{
> > > + if (vdev->iommufd_device)
> > > + return iommufd_device_to_ictx(vdev->iommufd_device);
> > > + if (vdev->noiommu_access)
> > > + return iommufd_access_to_ictx(vdev->noiommu_access);
> > > + return NULL;
> > > +}
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_iommufd_physical_ictx);
> > > +
> > > +int vfio_iommufd_physical_devid(struct vfio_device *vdev)
> > > +{
> > > + if (vdev->iommufd_device)
> > > + return iommufd_device_to_id(vdev->iommufd_device);
> > > + if (vdev->noiommu_access)
> > > + return iommufd_access_to_id(vdev->noiommu_access);
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > +}
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_iommufd_physical_devid);
> >
> > I think these exemplify that it would be better if both emulated and
> > noiommu use the same iommufd_access pointer. Thanks,
>
> Sure. Then I shall rename this helper. vfio_iommufd_device_devid()
> What about your opinion?

Yes, it really didn't even occur to me that "physical" in the name was
meant to suggest this shouldn't be used for emulated mdev devices. It
should work for all devices and using a shared iommufd access pointer
between noiommu and emulated should simplify that somewhat. Thanks,

Alex