From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED38FC001E0 for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 12:54:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA5FC10E137; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 12:54:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4122310E137 for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 12:54:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1690289659; x=1721825659; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=mz320zfDuWG0ltar3Ww3JoQCzXNVq6JbDe/TpMbtsEs=; b=np1qcBy3Y0OPYxaf00E1MbTdqUMa0AtnwE14viujP9BV5fLoIran7PDM D5tHk2S3NrrfqBN5OGgwlCzDElLs6yKPeU5epkqrxLCJwiYukMSAxBgzN VvlGgX1nLpLtvXqEGlvidmm7JR1THaMygbgz+Sutep8TbzL8vhT25sjvh 9IKP/MyQ/cjC7bJ1JsJH3j9crYWroV7MsS8ytLlm6QeBvSxtJvcsux4P+ 6UmvJ5qVcCP4m4mfBRiSfyimRrMrHFjJw5Sct8jUn+6ZqgN3eZAySpvxc ohL+PdxHuzJuDrB9pRS4NJQ3AmC2IbpNqiPygTDRK0W64Qrt0zwG11EKT g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10781"; a="367736454" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.01,230,1684825200"; d="scan'208";a="367736454" Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Jul 2023 05:54:18 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10781"; a="761198850" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.01,230,1684825200"; d="scan'208";a="761198850" Received: from kshutemo-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO intel.com) ([10.249.37.237]) by orsmga001-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Jul 2023 05:54:17 -0700 Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 14:54:14 +0200 From: Andi Shyti To: Uwe =?iso-8859-15?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= Message-ID: References: <20230721212133.271118-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> <168999615592.17723.14317445519700559147@emeril.freedesktop.org> <20230724073648.hjmu2ztfuau7zvdp@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230724073648.hjmu2ztfuau7zvdp@pengutronix.de> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] =?utf-8?b?4pyXIEZpLkNJLklHVDogZmFpbHVyZSBmb3IgZHJt?= =?utf-8?q?/i915=3A_Simplify_expression_=26to=5Fi915=28dev=29-=3Edrm?= X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" Hi Uwe, > > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes > > introduced in Patchwork_121164v1_full, please notify your bug team to allow them > > to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI. > > I don't think my patch results in regressions. But I fail to understand > the indications reported by patchwork, so I might miss something. I think the failure is unrelated, you can ignore it. For future patches in i915 (or drm in general), you can retrigger the tests from patchwork yourself when the results don't look convincing. Andi