intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Start separating pipe vs transcoder set logic for bigjoiner during modeset
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 18:47:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZaFtDg1fYWKAAsYx@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240108120725.20057-4-stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>

On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 02:07:25PM +0200, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> Handle only bigjoiner masters in skl_commit_modeset_enables/disables,
> slave crtcs should be handled by master hooks. Same for encoders.
> That way we can also remove a bunch of checks like intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_slave.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c     |   3 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 148 ++++++++++++++++---
>  2 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> index 2746655bcb264..9723f1b49cf95 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> @@ -3340,8 +3340,7 @@ static void intel_enable_ddi(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  {
>  	drm_WARN_ON(state->base.dev, crtc_state->has_pch_encoder);
>  
> -	if (!intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_slave(crtc_state))
> -		intel_ddi_enable_transcoder_func(encoder, crtc_state);
> +	intel_ddi_enable_transcoder_func(encoder, crtc_state);
>  
>  	/* Enable/Disable DP2.0 SDP split config before transcoder */
>  	intel_audio_sdp_split_update(crtc_state);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index eec76ec167069..24388226db465 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -1630,6 +1630,93 @@ static void hsw_configure_cpu_transcoder(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_sta
>  	hsw_set_transconf(crtc_state);
>  }
>  
> +static void hsw_crtc_enable_slave(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> +				  struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> +{
> +	const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state =
> +		intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, crtc);
> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> +	enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe, hsw_workaround_pipe;
> +	bool psl_clkgate_wa;
> +
> +	if (drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, crtc->active))
> +		return;
> +
> +	intel_dmc_enable_pipe(dev_priv, crtc->pipe);
> +
> +	if (!new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_pipes) {
> +		intel_encoders_pre_pll_enable(state, crtc);
> +
> +		if (new_crtc_state->shared_dpll)
> +			intel_enable_shared_dpll(new_crtc_state);
> +
> +		intel_encoders_pre_enable(state, crtc);
> +	} else {
> +		icl_ddi_bigjoiner_pre_enable(state, new_crtc_state);
> +	}
> +
> +	intel_dsc_enable(new_crtc_state);
> +
> +	if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 13)
> +		intel_uncompressed_joiner_enable(new_crtc_state);
> +
> +	intel_set_pipe_src_size(new_crtc_state);
> +	if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 9 || IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv))
> +		bdw_set_pipe_misc(new_crtc_state);
> +
> +	crtc->active = true;
> +
> +	/* Display WA #1180: WaDisableScalarClockGating: glk */
> +	psl_clkgate_wa = DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == 10 &&
> +		new_crtc_state->pch_pfit.enabled;
> +	if (psl_clkgate_wa)
> +		glk_pipe_scaler_clock_gating_wa(dev_priv, pipe, true);
> +
> +	if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 9)
> +		skl_pfit_enable(new_crtc_state);
> +	else
> +		ilk_pfit_enable(new_crtc_state);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * On ILK+ LUT must be loaded before the pipe is running but with
> +	 * clocks enabled
> +	 */
> +	intel_color_load_luts(new_crtc_state);
> +	intel_color_commit_noarm(new_crtc_state);
> +	intel_color_commit_arm(new_crtc_state);
> +	/* update DSPCNTR to configure gamma/csc for pipe bottom color */
> +	if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 9)
> +		intel_disable_primary_plane(new_crtc_state);
> +
> +	hsw_set_linetime_wm(new_crtc_state);
> +
> +	if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11)
> +		icl_set_pipe_chicken(new_crtc_state);
> +
> +	intel_initial_watermarks(state, crtc);
> +
> +	intel_crtc_vblank_on(new_crtc_state);
> +
> +	intel_encoders_enable(state, crtc);
> +
> +	if (psl_clkgate_wa) {
> +		intel_crtc_wait_for_next_vblank(crtc);
> +		glk_pipe_scaler_clock_gating_wa(dev_priv, pipe, false);
> +	}
> +
> +	/* If we change the relative order between pipe/planes enabling, we need
> +	 * to change the workaround. */
> +	hsw_workaround_pipe = new_crtc_state->hsw_workaround_pipe;
> +	if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv) && hsw_workaround_pipe != INVALID_PIPE) {
> +		struct intel_crtc *wa_crtc;
> +
> +		wa_crtc = intel_crtc_for_pipe(dev_priv, hsw_workaround_pipe);
> +
> +		intel_crtc_wait_for_next_vblank(wa_crtc);
> +		intel_crtc_wait_for_next_vblank(wa_crtc);
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  static void hsw_crtc_enable(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  			    struct intel_crtc *crtc)
>  {
> @@ -1639,10 +1726,16 @@ static void hsw_crtc_enable(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  	enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe, hsw_workaround_pipe;
>  	enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = new_crtc_state->cpu_transcoder;
>  	bool psl_clkgate_wa;
> +	struct intel_crtc *slave_crtc;
>  
>  	if (drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, crtc->active))
>  		return;
>  
> +	for_each_intel_crtc_in_pipe_mask(&dev_priv->drm, slave_crtc,
> +					 intel_crtc_bigjoiner_slave_pipes(new_crtc_state)) {
> +		hsw_crtc_enable_slave(state, slave_crtc);
> +	}

Thats not really what I'm after. Ideally we shouldn't end up with
any master vs. slave split here, just a pipe vs. transcoder split.
And then the high level flow should look something along the
lines of:

crtc_enable()
{
	transcoder_thing1();

	for_each_joined_pipe()
		pipe_thing1();

	transcoder_thing2();

	for_each_joined_pipe()
		pipe_thing2();

	...
}
	
-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-12 16:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-08 12:07 [PATCH 0/3] Bigjoiner refactoring Stanislav Lisovskiy
2024-01-08 12:07 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Add bigjoiner force enable option to debugfs Stanislav Lisovskiy
2024-01-12 16:25   ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-01-15  8:57     ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2024-01-17  1:12       ` Manasi Navare
2024-01-18 11:02   ` Stanislav Lisovskiy
2024-01-18 11:53     ` Jani Nikula
2024-01-18 11:59       ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2024-01-29  8:28     ` Stanislav Lisovskiy
2024-01-08 12:07 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/bigjoiner: Refactor bigjoiner state readout Stanislav Lisovskiy
2024-01-12 16:42   ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-01-15  9:24     ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2024-01-08 12:07 ` [PATCH 3/3] Start separating pipe vs transcoder set logic for bigjoiner during modeset Stanislav Lisovskiy
2024-01-12 16:47   ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2024-01-15  9:27     ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2024-01-29 12:57     ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2024-02-02 10:02   ` Stanislav Lisovskiy
2024-02-07 16:27     ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-02-13 10:35     ` Stanislav Lisovskiy
2024-01-08 13:02 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Bigjoiner refactoring (rev2) Patchwork
2024-01-08 13:02 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2024-01-08 13:11 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-01-08 14:46 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2024-01-18 20:41 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Bigjoiner refactoring (rev3) Patchwork
2024-01-18 20:41 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2024-01-18 20:55 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-01-19  9:16 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2024-01-29 12:26 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Bigjoiner refactoring (rev4) Patchwork
2024-01-29 12:26 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning " Patchwork
2024-01-29 12:26 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2024-01-30  0:59 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2024-02-02 18:00 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Bigjoiner refactoring (rev5) Patchwork
2024-02-02 18:29 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-02-13 13:18 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Bigjoiner refactoring (rev6) Patchwork
2024-02-13 13:38 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-01-08  8:58 [PATCH 0/3] Bigjoiner refactoring Stanislav Lisovskiy
2024-01-08  8:58 ` [PATCH 3/3] Start separating pipe vs transcoder set logic for bigjoiner during modeset Stanislav Lisovskiy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZaFtDg1fYWKAAsYx@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).