From: "Lisovskiy, Stanislav" <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Start separating pipe vs transcoder set logic for bigjoiner during modeset
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 11:27:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZaT6mdIACF+YboVj@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZaFtDg1fYWKAAsYx@intel.com>
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 06:47:10PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 02:07:25PM +0200, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> > Handle only bigjoiner masters in skl_commit_modeset_enables/disables,
> > slave crtcs should be handled by master hooks. Same for encoders.
> > That way we can also remove a bunch of checks like intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_slave.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c | 3 +-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 148 ++++++++++++++++---
> > 2 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> > index 2746655bcb264..9723f1b49cf95 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> > @@ -3340,8 +3340,7 @@ static void intel_enable_ddi(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> > {
> > drm_WARN_ON(state->base.dev, crtc_state->has_pch_encoder);
> >
> > - if (!intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_slave(crtc_state))
> > - intel_ddi_enable_transcoder_func(encoder, crtc_state);
> > + intel_ddi_enable_transcoder_func(encoder, crtc_state);
> >
> > /* Enable/Disable DP2.0 SDP split config before transcoder */
> > intel_audio_sdp_split_update(crtc_state);
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > index eec76ec167069..24388226db465 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> > @@ -1630,6 +1630,93 @@ static void hsw_configure_cpu_transcoder(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_sta
> > hsw_set_transconf(crtc_state);
> > }
> >
> > +static void hsw_crtc_enable_slave(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> > + struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> > +{
> > + const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state =
> > + intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, crtc);
> > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> > + enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe, hsw_workaround_pipe;
> > + bool psl_clkgate_wa;
> > +
> > + if (drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, crtc->active))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + intel_dmc_enable_pipe(dev_priv, crtc->pipe);
> > +
> > + if (!new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_pipes) {
> > + intel_encoders_pre_pll_enable(state, crtc);
> > +
> > + if (new_crtc_state->shared_dpll)
> > + intel_enable_shared_dpll(new_crtc_state);
> > +
> > + intel_encoders_pre_enable(state, crtc);
> > + } else {
> > + icl_ddi_bigjoiner_pre_enable(state, new_crtc_state);
> > + }
> > +
> > + intel_dsc_enable(new_crtc_state);
> > +
> > + if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 13)
> > + intel_uncompressed_joiner_enable(new_crtc_state);
> > +
> > + intel_set_pipe_src_size(new_crtc_state);
> > + if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 9 || IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv))
> > + bdw_set_pipe_misc(new_crtc_state);
> > +
> > + crtc->active = true;
> > +
> > + /* Display WA #1180: WaDisableScalarClockGating: glk */
> > + psl_clkgate_wa = DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == 10 &&
> > + new_crtc_state->pch_pfit.enabled;
> > + if (psl_clkgate_wa)
> > + glk_pipe_scaler_clock_gating_wa(dev_priv, pipe, true);
> > +
> > + if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 9)
> > + skl_pfit_enable(new_crtc_state);
> > + else
> > + ilk_pfit_enable(new_crtc_state);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * On ILK+ LUT must be loaded before the pipe is running but with
> > + * clocks enabled
> > + */
> > + intel_color_load_luts(new_crtc_state);
> > + intel_color_commit_noarm(new_crtc_state);
> > + intel_color_commit_arm(new_crtc_state);
> > + /* update DSPCNTR to configure gamma/csc for pipe bottom color */
> > + if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 9)
> > + intel_disable_primary_plane(new_crtc_state);
> > +
> > + hsw_set_linetime_wm(new_crtc_state);
> > +
> > + if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11)
> > + icl_set_pipe_chicken(new_crtc_state);
> > +
> > + intel_initial_watermarks(state, crtc);
> > +
> > + intel_crtc_vblank_on(new_crtc_state);
> > +
> > + intel_encoders_enable(state, crtc);
> > +
> > + if (psl_clkgate_wa) {
> > + intel_crtc_wait_for_next_vblank(crtc);
> > + glk_pipe_scaler_clock_gating_wa(dev_priv, pipe, false);
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* If we change the relative order between pipe/planes enabling, we need
> > + * to change the workaround. */
> > + hsw_workaround_pipe = new_crtc_state->hsw_workaround_pipe;
> > + if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv) && hsw_workaround_pipe != INVALID_PIPE) {
> > + struct intel_crtc *wa_crtc;
> > +
> > + wa_crtc = intel_crtc_for_pipe(dev_priv, hsw_workaround_pipe);
> > +
> > + intel_crtc_wait_for_next_vblank(wa_crtc);
> > + intel_crtc_wait_for_next_vblank(wa_crtc);
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > static void hsw_crtc_enable(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> > struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> > {
> > @@ -1639,10 +1726,16 @@ static void hsw_crtc_enable(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> > enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe, hsw_workaround_pipe;
> > enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = new_crtc_state->cpu_transcoder;
> > bool psl_clkgate_wa;
> > + struct intel_crtc *slave_crtc;
> >
> > if (drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, crtc->active))
> > return;
> >
> > + for_each_intel_crtc_in_pipe_mask(&dev_priv->drm, slave_crtc,
> > + intel_crtc_bigjoiner_slave_pipes(new_crtc_state)) {
> > + hsw_crtc_enable_slave(state, slave_crtc);
> > + }
>
> Thats not really what I'm after. Ideally we shouldn't end up with
> any master vs. slave split here, just a pipe vs. transcoder split.
> And then the high level flow should look something along the
> lines of:
>
> crtc_enable()
> {
> transcoder_thing1();
>
> for_each_joined_pipe()
> pipe_thing1();
>
> transcoder_thing2();
>
> for_each_joined_pipe()
> pipe_thing2();
>
> ...
> }
>
> --
> Ville Syrjälä
Yes, I remember we discussed that you don't want any slaves to be processed
in *commit_modeset_enables/disables, I guess it obivously means we need to
process the here. Ah, I guess you mean we don't explicitly state, those are slaves
but just iterate through all joined pipe mask.
Okay, got it(wonder why I didn't do that myself initially..)
Stan
> Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-15 9:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-08 12:07 [PATCH 0/3] Bigjoiner refactoring Stanislav Lisovskiy
2024-01-08 12:07 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Add bigjoiner force enable option to debugfs Stanislav Lisovskiy
2024-01-12 16:25 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-01-15 8:57 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2024-01-17 1:12 ` Manasi Navare
2024-01-18 11:02 ` Stanislav Lisovskiy
2024-01-18 11:53 ` Jani Nikula
2024-01-18 11:59 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2024-01-29 8:28 ` Stanislav Lisovskiy
2024-01-08 12:07 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/bigjoiner: Refactor bigjoiner state readout Stanislav Lisovskiy
2024-01-12 16:42 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-01-15 9:24 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2024-01-08 12:07 ` [PATCH 3/3] Start separating pipe vs transcoder set logic for bigjoiner during modeset Stanislav Lisovskiy
2024-01-12 16:47 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-01-15 9:27 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav [this message]
2024-01-29 12:57 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2024-02-02 10:02 ` Stanislav Lisovskiy
2024-02-07 16:27 ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-02-13 10:35 ` Stanislav Lisovskiy
2024-01-08 13:02 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Bigjoiner refactoring (rev2) Patchwork
2024-01-08 13:02 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2024-01-08 13:11 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-01-08 14:46 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2024-01-18 20:41 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Bigjoiner refactoring (rev3) Patchwork
2024-01-18 20:41 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2024-01-18 20:55 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-01-19 9:16 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2024-01-29 12:26 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Bigjoiner refactoring (rev4) Patchwork
2024-01-29 12:26 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning " Patchwork
2024-01-29 12:26 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2024-01-30 0:59 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2024-02-02 18:00 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Bigjoiner refactoring (rev5) Patchwork
2024-02-02 18:29 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-02-13 13:18 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Bigjoiner refactoring (rev6) Patchwork
2024-02-13 13:38 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-01-08 8:58 [PATCH 0/3] Bigjoiner refactoring Stanislav Lisovskiy
2024-01-08 8:58 ` [PATCH 3/3] Start separating pipe vs transcoder set logic for bigjoiner during modeset Stanislav Lisovskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZaT6mdIACF+YboVj@intel.com \
--to=stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).