intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Lisovskiy, Stanislav" <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915: Handle joined pipes inside hsw_crtc_disable()
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 18:08:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZeH9gPrpd0fsqtPa@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240301143600.1334-9-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 04:36:00PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> 
> Reorganize the crtc disable path to only deal with the
> master pipes/transcoders in intel_old_crtc_state_disables()
> and offload the handling of joined pipes to hsw_crtc_disable().
> This makes the whole thing much more sensible since we can
> actually control the order in which we do the per-pipe vs.
> per-transcoder modeset steps.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 64 ++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 1df3923cc30d..07239c1ce9df 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -1793,29 +1793,27 @@ static void hsw_crtc_disable(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  	const struct intel_crtc_state *old_master_crtc_state =
>  		intel_atomic_get_old_crtc_state(state, master_crtc);
>  	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(master_crtc->base.dev);
> +	u8 pipe_mask = intel_crtc_joined_pipe_mask(old_master_crtc_state);
> +	struct intel_crtc *crtc;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * FIXME collapse everything to one hook.
>  	 * Need care with mst->ddi interactions.
>  	 */
> -	if (!intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_slave(old_master_crtc_state)) {
> -		intel_encoders_disable(state, master_crtc);
> -		intel_encoders_post_disable(state, master_crtc);
> -	}
> -
> -	intel_disable_shared_dpll(old_master_crtc_state);
> +	intel_encoders_disable(state, master_crtc);
> +	intel_encoders_post_disable(state, master_crtc);
>  
> -	if (!intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_slave(old_master_crtc_state)) {
> -		struct intel_crtc *slave_crtc;
> +	for_each_intel_crtc_in_pipe_mask(&i915->drm, crtc, pipe_mask) {
> +		const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state =
> +			intel_atomic_get_old_crtc_state(state, crtc);
>  
> -		intel_encoders_post_pll_disable(state, master_crtc);
> +		intel_disable_shared_dpll(old_crtc_state);
> +	}
>  
> -		intel_dmc_disable_pipe(i915, master_crtc->pipe);
> +	intel_encoders_post_pll_disable(state, master_crtc);
>  
> -		for_each_intel_crtc_in_pipe_mask(&i915->drm, slave_crtc,
> -						 intel_crtc_bigjoiner_slave_pipes(old_master_crtc_state))
> -			intel_dmc_disable_pipe(i915, slave_crtc->pipe);
> -	}
> +	for_each_intel_crtc_in_pipe_mask(&i915->drm, crtc, pipe_mask)
> +		intel_dmc_disable_pipe(i915, crtc->pipe);
>  }
>  
>  static void i9xx_pfit_enable(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> @@ -6753,24 +6751,33 @@ static void intel_update_crtc(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  }
>  
>  static void intel_old_crtc_state_disables(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> -					  struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> +					  struct intel_crtc *master_crtc)
>  {
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
> -	const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state =
> -		intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, crtc);
> +	const struct intel_crtc_state *old_master_crtc_state =
> +		intel_atomic_get_old_crtc_state(state, master_crtc);
> +	u8 pipe_mask = intel_crtc_joined_pipe_mask(old_master_crtc_state);
> +	struct intel_crtc *crtc;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * We need to disable pipe CRC before disabling the pipe,
>  	 * or we race against vblank off.
>  	 */
> -	intel_crtc_disable_pipe_crc(crtc);
> +	for_each_intel_crtc_in_pipe_mask(&dev_priv->drm, crtc, pipe_mask)
> +		intel_crtc_disable_pipe_crc(crtc);
>  
>  	dev_priv->display.funcs.display->crtc_disable(state, crtc);
> -	crtc->active = false;
> -	intel_fbc_disable(crtc);
>  
> -	if (!new_crtc_state->hw.active)
> -		intel_initial_watermarks(state, crtc);
> +	for_each_intel_crtc_in_pipe_mask(&dev_priv->drm, crtc, pipe_mask) {
> +		const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state =
> +			intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, crtc);
> +
> +		crtc->active = false;
> +		intel_fbc_disable(crtc);
> +
> +		if (!new_crtc_state->hw.active)
> +			intel_initial_watermarks(state, crtc);
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  static void intel_commit_modeset_disables(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> @@ -6810,19 +6817,21 @@ static void intel_commit_modeset_disables(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
>  		if ((disable_pipes & BIT(crtc->pipe)) == 0)
>  			continue;
>  
> +		if (intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_slave(old_crtc_state))
> +			continue;
> +
>  		/* In case of Transcoder port Sync master slave CRTCs can be
>  		 * assigned in any order and we need to make sure that
>  		 * slave CRTCs are disabled first and then master CRTC since
>  		 * Slave vblanks are masked till Master Vblanks.
>  		 */
>  		if (!is_trans_port_sync_slave(old_crtc_state) &&
> -		    !intel_dp_mst_is_slave_trans(old_crtc_state) &&
> -		    !intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_slave(old_crtc_state))
> +		    !intel_dp_mst_is_slave_trans(old_crtc_state))
>  			continue;
>  
>  		intel_old_crtc_state_disables(state, crtc);
>  
> -		disable_pipes &= ~BIT(crtc->pipe);
> +		disable_pipes &= ~intel_crtc_joined_pipe_mask(old_crtc_state);
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Disable everything else left on */
> @@ -6830,9 +6839,12 @@ static void intel_commit_modeset_disables(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
>  		if ((disable_pipes & BIT(crtc->pipe)) == 0)
>  			continue;
>  
> +		if (intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_slave(old_crtc_state))
> +			continue;
> +
>  		intel_old_crtc_state_disables(state, crtc);
>  
> -		disable_pipes &= ~BIT(crtc->pipe);
> +		disable_pipes &= ~intel_crtc_joined_pipe_mask(old_crtc_state);

Yep btw that one I've also fixed today, based on your comment, also for enable side..


Stan

>  	}
>  
>  	drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, disable_pipes);
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-03-01 16:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-01 14:35 [PATCH 0/8] drm/i915: Bigjoiner stuff Ville Syrjala
2024-03-01 14:35 ` [PATCH 1/8] drm/i915: Rename the crtc/crtc_states in the top level DDI hooks/etc Ville Syrjala
2024-03-05  8:41   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2024-03-05  8:50     ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-03-05  9:08       ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2024-03-05  9:19         ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-03-05 14:07       ` Jani Nikula
2024-03-05 14:34         ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-03-05 14:57           ` Jani Nikula
2024-03-01 14:35 ` [PATCH 2/8] drm/i915: Introduce intel_crtc_joined_pipe_mask() Ville Syrjala
2024-03-01 14:35 ` [PATCH 3/8] drm/i915: Extract intel_ddi_post_disable_hdmi_or_sst() Ville Syrjala
2024-03-05  8:47   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2024-03-01 14:35 ` [PATCH 4/8] drm/i915: Utilize intel_crtc_joined_pipe_mask() more Ville Syrjala
2024-03-01 14:35 ` [PATCH 5/8] drm/i915: Precompute disable_pipes bitmask in intel_commit_modeset_disables() Ville Syrjala
2024-03-05  8:49   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2024-03-01 14:35 ` [PATCH 6/8] drm/i915: Disable planes more atomically during modesets Ville Syrjala
2024-03-05  8:58   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2024-03-01 14:35 ` [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915: Simplify intel_old_crtc_state_disables() calling convention Ville Syrjala
2024-03-05  8:59   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2024-03-01 14:36 ` [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915: Handle joined pipes inside hsw_crtc_disable() Ville Syrjala
2024-03-01 16:04   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2024-03-01 16:10     ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-03-01 16:22       ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2024-03-01 16:47         ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-03-04  8:55           ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2024-03-01 16:08   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav [this message]
2024-03-01 16:15   ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-03-01 17:23   ` [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2024-03-04  6:44     ` Srinivas, Vidya
2024-03-04 10:20       ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2024-03-01 19:54 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Bigjoiner stuff (rev2) Patchwork
2024-03-01 20:12 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZeH9gPrpd0fsqtPa@intel.com \
    --to=stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).