From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] drm/i915: use INTEL_WAKEREF_DEF instead of magic -1 for intel_wakeref_t
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 16:45:47 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZvXH-4IMJxUBooi3@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57e5f1989113be4d63386478d9438cfc35a2a1f7.1726680898.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>
On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 08:35:44PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> A number of places rely on the magic -1 to denote
> INTEL_WAKEREF_DEF. Switch to the macro. Define it for xe as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.h | 4 ++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wakeref.h | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/intel_runtime_pm.h | 7 ++++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/intel_wakeref.h | 2 ++
> 6 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> index ecabb674644b..40727a22f18b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> @@ -895,7 +895,7 @@ intel_display_power_put_mask_in_set(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> !bitmap_subset(mask->bits, power_domain_set->mask.bits, POWER_DOMAIN_NUM));
>
> for_each_power_domain(domain, mask) {
> - intel_wakeref_t __maybe_unused wf = -1;
> + intel_wakeref_t __maybe_unused wf = INTEL_WAKEREF_DEF;
>
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_DEBUG_RUNTIME_PM)
> wf = fetch_and_zero(&power_domain_set->wakerefs[domain]);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.h
> index 425452c5a469..3b7c1a0bb1de 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.h
> @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ intel_display_power_put_async(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> enum intel_display_power_domain domain,
> intel_wakeref_t wakeref)
> {
> - __intel_display_power_put_async(i915, domain, -1, -1);
> + __intel_display_power_put_async(i915, domain, INTEL_WAKEREF_DEF, -1);
> }
>
> static inline void
> @@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ intel_display_power_put_async_delay(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> intel_wakeref_t wakeref,
> int delay_ms)
> {
> - __intel_display_power_put_async(i915, domain, -1, delay_ms);
> + __intel_display_power_put_async(i915, domain, INTEL_WAKEREF_DEF, delay_ms);
> }
> #endif
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> index 2d0647aca964..a21f5a1c89bc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ static intel_wakeref_t
> track_intel_runtime_pm_wakeref(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm)
> {
> if (!rpm->available || rpm->no_wakeref_tracking)
> - return -1;
> + return INTEL_WAKEREF_DEF;
>
> return intel_ref_tracker_alloc(&rpm->debug);
> }
> @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ static void init_intel_runtime_pm_wakeref(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm)
> static intel_wakeref_t
> track_intel_runtime_pm_wakeref(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm)
> {
> - return -1;
> + return INTEL_WAKEREF_DEF;
> }
>
> static void untrack_intel_runtime_pm_wakeref(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm,
> @@ -336,7 +336,7 @@ intel_runtime_pm_put_raw(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm, intel_wakeref_t wref)
> */
> void intel_runtime_pm_put_unchecked(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm)
> {
> - __intel_runtime_pm_put(rpm, -1, true);
> + __intel_runtime_pm_put(rpm, INTEL_WAKEREF_DEF, true);
> }
>
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_DEBUG_RUNTIME_PM)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wakeref.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wakeref.h
> index 68aa3be48251..3944587a5e78 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wakeref.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wakeref.h
> @@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ static inline void intel_wakeref_untrack(struct intel_wakeref *wf,
>
> static inline intel_wakeref_t intel_wakeref_track(struct intel_wakeref *wf)
> {
> - return -1;
> + return INTEL_WAKEREF_DEF;
> }
>
> static inline void intel_wakeref_untrack(struct intel_wakeref *wf,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/intel_runtime_pm.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/intel_runtime_pm.h
> index 8c7b315aa8ac..380d25428bdb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/intel_runtime_pm.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/intel_runtime_pm.h
> @@ -24,14 +24,14 @@ static inline intel_wakeref_t intel_runtime_pm_get(struct xe_runtime_pm *pm)
> {
> struct xe_device *xe = container_of(pm, struct xe_device, runtime_pm);
>
> - return xe_pm_runtime_resume_and_get(xe);
> + return xe_pm_runtime_resume_and_get(xe) ? INTEL_WAKEREF_DEF : 0;
> }
>
> static inline intel_wakeref_t intel_runtime_pm_get_if_in_use(struct xe_runtime_pm *pm)
> {
> struct xe_device *xe = container_of(pm, struct xe_device, runtime_pm);
>
> - return xe_pm_runtime_get_if_in_use(xe);
> + return xe_pm_runtime_get_if_in_use(xe) ? INTEL_WAKEREF_DEF : 0;
> }
>
> static inline intel_wakeref_t intel_runtime_pm_get_noresume(struct xe_runtime_pm *pm)
> @@ -39,7 +39,8 @@ static inline intel_wakeref_t intel_runtime_pm_get_noresume(struct xe_runtime_pm
> struct xe_device *xe = container_of(pm, struct xe_device, runtime_pm);
>
> xe_pm_runtime_get_noresume(xe);
> - return true;
> +
> + return INTEL_WAKEREF_DEF;
oh! for some reason I thought we were redefining the intel_wakeref_t to bool
here in Xe...
> }
>
> static inline void intel_runtime_pm_put_unchecked(struct xe_runtime_pm *pm)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/intel_wakeref.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/intel_wakeref.h
> index ecb1c0707706..5c139ba144a6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/intel_wakeref.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/intel_wakeref.h
> @@ -6,3 +6,5 @@
> #include <linux/types.h>
>
> typedef unsigned long intel_wakeref_t;
but apparently not, but we were lucky!
this definition brings more clarity indeed.
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> +
> +#define INTEL_WAKEREF_DEF ((intel_wakeref_t)(-1))
> --
> 2.39.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-26 20:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-18 17:35 [PATCH v2 0/6] drm/i915: wakeref fixes and improvements Jani Nikula
2024-09-18 17:35 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] drm/i915/gem: fix bitwise and logical AND mixup Jani Nikula
2024-09-26 20:40 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-09-27 8:38 ` Jani Nikula
2024-09-30 13:54 ` Jani Nikula
2024-09-30 14:23 ` Matthew Auld
2024-09-30 14:58 ` Jani Nikula
2024-09-18 17:35 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] drm/i915: use INTEL_WAKEREF_DEF instead of magic -1 for intel_wakeref_t Jani Nikula
2024-09-26 20:45 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2024-09-18 17:35 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] drm/i915/display: return 0 instead of false for disabled power wakeref Jani Nikula
2024-09-26 20:46 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-09-18 17:35 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] drm/i915/gt: add a macro for mock gt wakeref special value and use it Jani Nikula
2024-09-26 20:49 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-09-18 17:35 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] drm/i915/audio: be explicit about intel_wakeref_t conversions Jani Nikula
2024-09-26 20:49 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-09-18 17:35 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] drm/i915: switch intel_wakeref_t underlying type to struct ref_tracker * Jani Nikula
2024-09-26 20:52 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-09-18 18:24 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: wakeref fixes and improvements (rev2) Patchwork
2024-09-18 18:24 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2024-09-18 18:36 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-09-18 21:37 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: wakeref fixes and improvements (rev3) Patchwork
2024-09-18 21:37 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2024-09-18 21:46 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-09-19 9:25 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZvXH-4IMJxUBooi3@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).