From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: "Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
"Paul Menzel" <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>,
"Jonathan Cavitt" <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/dp: Change AUX DPCD probe address from LANE0_1_STATUS to TRAINING_PATTERN_SET
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 11:57:54 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aHTGkoRydum652gC@ideak-desk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aG-j3NuvQCwLJKCO@ideak-desk>
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 02:28:28PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> Hi Thomas, Maxime, Maarten,
>
> the patch this change fixes (commit a40c5d727b81) was merged via
> drm-intel and is also part of v6.16-rc4 (there cherry-picked in commit
> a3ef3c2da675).
>
> Are you ok with merging this fix via drm-intel as well, so that it could
> be still merged to v6.16 before that's released?
any objections to merging this patch to drm-intel? If not, could someone
ack it?
Thanks,
Imre
>
> Thanks,
> Imre
>
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2025 at 12:23:31AM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> > Commit a40c5d727b81 ("drm/dp: Change AUX DPCD probe address from
> > DPCD_REV to LANE0_1_STATUS") stopped using the DPCD_REV register for
> > DPCD probing, since this results in link training failures at least when
> > using an Intel Barlow Ridge TBT hub at UHBR link rates (the
> > DP_INTRA_HOP_AUX_REPLY_INDICATION never getting cleared after the failed
> > link training). Since accessing DPCD_REV during link training is
> > prohibited by the DP Standard, LANE0_1_STATUS (0x202) was used instead,
> > as it falls within the Standard's valid register address range
> > (0x102-0x106, 0x202-0x207, 0x200c-0x200f, 0x2216) and it fixed the link
> > training on the above TBT hub.
> >
> > However, reading the LANE0_1_STATUS register also has a side-effect at
> > least on a Novatek eDP panel, as reported on the Closes: link below,
> > resulting in screen flickering on that panel. One clear side-effect when
> > doing the 1-byte probe reads from LANE0_1_STATUS during link training
> > before reading out the full 6 byte link status starting at the same
> > address is that the panel will report the link training as completed
> > with voltage swing 0. This is different from the normal, flicker-free
> > scenario when no DPCD probing is done, the panel reporting the link
> > training complete with voltage swing 2.
> >
> > Using the TRAINING_PATTERN_SET register for DPCD probing doesn't have
> > the above side-effect, the panel will link train with voltage swing 2 as
> > expected and it will stay flicker-free. This register is also in the
> > above valid register range and is unlikely to have a side-effect as that
> > of LANE0_1_STATUS: Reading LANE0_1_STATUS is part of the link training
> > CR/EQ sequences and so it may cause a state change in the sink - even if
> > inadvertently as I suspect in the case of the above Novatek panel. As
> > opposed to this, reading TRAINING_PATTERN_SET is not part of the link
> > training sequence (it must be only written once at the beginning of the
> > CR/EQ sequences), so it's unlikely to cause any state change in the
> > sink.
> >
> > As a side-note, this Novatek panel also lacks support for TPS3, while
> > claiming support for HBR2, which violates the DP Standard (the Standard
> > mandating TPS3 for HBR2).
> >
> > Besides the Novatek panel (PSR 1), which this change fixes, I also
> > verified the change on a Samsung (PSR 1) and an Analogix (PSR 2) eDP
> > panel as well as on the Intel Barlow Ridge TBT hub.
> >
> > Note that in the drm-tip tree (targeting the v6.17 kernel version) the
> > i915 and xe drivers keep DPCD probing enabled only for the panel known
> > to require this (HP ZR24w), hence those drivers in drm-tip are not
> > affected by the above problem.
> >
> > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
> > Fixes: a40c5d727b81 ("drm/dp: Change AUX DPCD probe address from DPCD_REV to LANE0_1_STATUS")
> > Reported-and-tested-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
> > Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/i915/kernel/-/issues/14558
> > Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c
> > index 1c3920297906b..1ecc3df7e3167 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c
> > @@ -742,7 +742,7 @@ ssize_t drm_dp_dpcd_read(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, unsigned int offset,
> > int ret;
> >
> > if (dpcd_access_needs_probe(aux)) {
> > - ret = drm_dp_dpcd_probe(aux, DP_LANE0_1_STATUS);
> > + ret = drm_dp_dpcd_probe(aux, DP_TRAINING_PATTERN_SET);
> > if (ret < 0)
> > return ret;
> > }
> > --
> > 2.44.2
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-14 8:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-08 21:23 [PATCH] drm/dp: Change AUX DPCD probe address from LANE0_1_STATUS to TRAINING_PATTERN_SET Imre Deak
2025-07-08 21:55 ` Cavitt, Jonathan
2025-07-09 11:32 ` Imre Deak
2025-07-08 22:16 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2025-07-09 4:09 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-07-09 5:57 ` [PATCH] " Paul Menzel
2025-07-09 12:39 ` Imre Deak
2025-07-10 11:28 ` Imre Deak
2025-07-14 8:57 ` Imre Deak [this message]
2025-07-14 9:00 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2025-07-14 20:06 ` Imre Deak
2025-07-15 13:42 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-07-14 20:32 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/dp: Change AUX DPCD probe address from LANE0_1_STATUS to TRAINING_PATTERN_SET (rev2) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aHTGkoRydum652gC@ideak-desk \
--to=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jonathan.cavitt@intel.com \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).