intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: "Shankar, Uma" <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Cc: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 06/11] drm/i195/wm: Add WM0 prefill helpers
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 00:49:54 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aO10AiKxoC-uKzg0@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM4PR11MB6360E7A89CAF8C2E64384053F4EAA@DM4PR11MB6360.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 06:30:20PM +0000, Shankar, Uma wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of Ville
> > Syrjala
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2025 11:56 PM
> > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Subject: [RFC][PATCH 06/11] drm/i195/wm: Add WM0 prefill helpers
> > 
> 
> Nit: Typo in i915
> 
> Overall looks good to me. More refinement can be done later for the FIXME's 
> and Todo's

Actually I think I can just drop a bunch of it since this will only
get used for the VRR guardband calculation, so we definitely don't
have to worry about any pre-icl stuff here. I'll probably throw in
a WARN(!HAS_VRR)+comment as a reminder.

> Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
> 
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > 
> > Add skl_wm0_prefill_lines() (based on the actual state) and
> > skl_wm0_prefill_lines_worst() (worst case estimate) which tell us how many extra
> > lines are needed in prefill for WM0.
> > 
> > The returned numbers are in .16 binary fixed point.
> > 
> > TODO: skl_wm0_prefill_lines_worst() is a bit rough still
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_scaler.c    | 32 ++++++++++-
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_scaler.h    |  4 ++
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.h |  3 +
> >  4 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_scaler.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_scaler.c
> > index 6e90639494ca..783fee985e84 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_scaler.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_scaler.c
> > @@ -1089,7 +1089,37 @@ static unsigned int _skl_scaler_max_scale(const
> > struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_st
> >  					       crtc_state-
> > >hw.pipe_mode.crtc_clock));
> >  }
> > 
> > -static unsigned int skl_scaler_max_scale(const struct intel_crtc_state
> > *crtc_state)
> > +unsigned int skl_scaler_max_total_scale(const struct intel_crtc_state
> > +*crtc_state) {
> > +	struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
> > +	unsigned int max_scale;
> > +
> > +	if (crtc->num_scalers < 1)
> > +		return 0x10000;
> > +
> > +	/* FIXME find out the max downscale factors properly */
> > +	max_scale = 9 << 16;
> > +	if (crtc->num_scalers > 1)
> > +		max_scale *= 9;
> > +
> > +	return _skl_scaler_max_scale(crtc_state, max_scale); }
> > +
> > +unsigned int skl_scaler_max_hscale(const struct intel_crtc_state
> > +*crtc_state) {
> > +	struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
> > +	unsigned int max_scale;
> > +
> > +	if (crtc->num_scalers < 1)
> > +		return 0x10000;
> > +
> > +	/* FIXME find out the max downscale factors properly */
> > +	max_scale = 3 << 16;
> > +
> > +	return _skl_scaler_max_scale(crtc_state, max_scale); }
> > +
> > +unsigned int skl_scaler_max_scale(const struct intel_crtc_state
> > +*crtc_state)
> >  {
> >  	struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
> >  	unsigned int max_scale;
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_scaler.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_scaler.h
> > index 6fab40d2b4ee..5deabca909e6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_scaler.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_scaler.h
> > @@ -46,6 +46,10 @@ void adl_scaler_ecc_mask(const struct intel_crtc_state
> > *crtc_state);
> > 
> >  void adl_scaler_ecc_unmask(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> > 
> > +unsigned int skl_scaler_max_total_scale(const struct intel_crtc_state
> > +*crtc_state); unsigned int skl_scaler_max_scale(const struct
> > +intel_crtc_state *crtc_state); unsigned int skl_scaler_max_hscale(const
> > +struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> > +
> >  unsigned int skl_scaler_1st_prefill_adjustment_worst(const struct intel_crtc_state
> > *crtc_state);  unsigned int skl_scaler_2nd_prefill_adjustment_worst(const struct
> > intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);  unsigned int
> > skl_scaler_1st_prefill_lines_worst(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state); diff --
> > git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> > index 9df9ee137bf9..aac3ca8f6c0f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> > @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
> >  #include "intel_pcode.h"
> >  #include "intel_plane.h"
> >  #include "intel_wm.h"
> > +#include "skl_scaler.h"
> >  #include "skl_universal_plane_regs.h"
> >  #include "skl_watermark.h"
> >  #include "skl_watermark_regs.h"
> > @@ -2244,6 +2245,59 @@ skl_is_vblank_too_short(const struct intel_crtc_state
> > *crtc_state,
> >  		adjusted_mode->crtc_vtotal - adjusted_mode->crtc_vblank_start;
> > }
> > 
> > +unsigned int skl_wm0_prefill_lines_worst(const struct intel_crtc_state
> > +*crtc_state) {
> > +	struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(crtc_state);
> > +	struct intel_plane *plane = to_intel_plane(crtc_state->uapi.crtc->primary);
> > +	const struct drm_display_mode *pipe_mode = &crtc_state-
> > >hw.pipe_mode;
> > +	int ret, pixel_rate, width, level = 0;
> > +	struct skl_wm_level wm = {};
> > +	struct skl_wm_params wp;
> > +	unsigned int latency;
> > +	u64 modifier;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * FIXME rather ugly to pick this by hand but maybe no other way?
> > +	 * FIXME older hw doesn't support 16bpc+scaling so we should figure
> > +	 *       out a more realistic modifier+scaling combo on those...
> > +	 */
> > +	if (DISPLAY_VER(display) == 9)
> > +		modifier = I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED_CCS;
> > +	else if (HAS_4TILE(display))
> > +		modifier = I915_FORMAT_MOD_4_TILED;
> > +	else
> > +		modifier = I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED;
> > +
> > +	pixel_rate =
> > DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(mul_u32_u32(skl_scaler_max_total_scale(crtc_state),
> > +						  pipe_mode->crtc_clock),
> > +				      0x10000);
> > +
> > +	/* FIXME limit to max plane width? */
> > +	width =
> > DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(mul_u32_u32(skl_scaler_max_hscale(crtc_state),
> > +					     pipe_mode->crtc_hdisplay),
> > +				 0x10000);
> > +
> > +	/* FIXME is 90/270 rotation worse than 0/180? */
> > +	ret = skl_compute_wm_params(crtc_state, width,
> > +
> > drm_format_info(DRM_FORMAT_XBGR16161616F),
> > +				    modifier, DRM_MODE_ROTATE_0,
> > +				    pixel_rate, &wp, 0, 1);
> > +	drm_WARN_ON(display->drm, ret);
> > +
> > +	latency = skl_wm_latency(display, level, &wp);
> > +
> > +	skl_compute_plane_wm(crtc_state, plane, level, latency, &wp, &wm,
> > +&wm);
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * FIXME Is this sane? Older hw doesn't even have wm.lines for WM0 so
> > +	 * those will never hit this and just return the computed wm.lines.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (wm.min_ddb_alloc == U16_MAX)
> > +		wm.lines = skl_wm_max_lines(display);
> > +
> > +	return wm.lines << 16;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static int skl_max_wm0_lines(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)  {
> >  	struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
> > @@ -2260,6 +2314,11 @@ static int skl_max_wm0_lines(const struct
> > intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> >  	return wm0_lines;
> >  }
> > 
> > +unsigned int skl_wm0_prefill_lines(const struct intel_crtc_state
> > +*crtc_state) {
> > +	return skl_max_wm0_lines(crtc_state) << 16; }
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * TODO: In case we use PKG_C_LATENCY to allow C-states when the delayed
> > vblank
> >   * size is too small for the package C exit latency we need to notify PSR about
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.h
> > index 62790816f030..6bc2ec9164bf 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.h
> > @@ -79,5 +79,8 @@ void intel_program_dpkgc_latency(struct intel_atomic_state
> > *state);
> > 
> >  bool intel_dbuf_pmdemand_needs_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state);
> > 
> > +unsigned int skl_wm0_prefill_lines_worst(const struct intel_crtc_state
> > +*crtc_state); unsigned int skl_wm0_prefill_lines(const struct
> > +intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> > +
> >  #endif /* __SKL_WATERMARK_H__ */
> > 
> > --
> > 2.49.1
> 

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-13 21:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-08 18:25 [RFC][PATCH 00/11] drm/i915/prefill: Introduce helpers for prefill latency calculations Ville Syrjala
2025-10-08 18:25 ` [RFC][PATCH 01/11] drm/i915: Reject modes with linetime > 64 usec Ville Syrjala
2025-10-13 15:15   ` Shankar, Uma
2025-10-08 18:25 ` [RFC][PATCH 02/11] drm/i915/cdclk: Add prefill helpers for CDCLK Ville Syrjala
2025-10-13 16:11   ` Shankar, Uma
2025-10-08 18:25 ` [RFC][PATCH 03/11] drm/i915/cdclk: Add intel_cdclk_min_cdclk_for_prefill() Ville Syrjala
2025-10-13 16:25   ` Shankar, Uma
2025-10-08 18:25 ` [RFC][PATCH 04/11] drm/i915/dsc: Add prefill helper for DSC Ville Syrjala
2025-10-13 16:26   ` Shankar, Uma
2025-10-08 18:25 ` [RFC][PATCH 05/11] drm/i915/scaler: Add scaler prefill helpers Ville Syrjala
2025-10-13 17:56   ` Shankar, Uma
2025-10-08 18:25 ` [RFC][PATCH 06/11] drm/i195/wm: Add WM0 " Ville Syrjala
2025-10-13 18:30   ` Shankar, Uma
2025-10-13 21:49     ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2025-10-08 18:25 ` [RFC][PATCH 07/11] drm/i915: Introduce intel_compute_global_watermarks_late() Ville Syrjala
2025-10-13 18:36   ` Shankar, Uma
2025-10-13 20:35     ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-10-08 18:25 ` [RFC][PATCH 08/11] drm/i915/prefill: Introduce intel_prefill.c Ville Syrjala
2025-10-13 18:42   ` Shankar, Uma
2025-10-13 21:37     ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-10-08 18:25 ` [RFC][PATCH 09/11] drm/i915/wm: Use intel_prefill Ville Syrjala
2025-10-13 18:43   ` Shankar, Uma
2025-10-08 18:25 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/11] drm/i915/prefill: Print the prefill details Ville Syrjala
2025-10-13 18:45   ` Shankar, Uma
2025-10-08 18:25 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/11] drm/i915/prefill: Also print out the worst case estimates Ville Syrjala
2025-10-13 18:47   ` Shankar, Uma

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aO10AiKxoC-uKzg0@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=uma.shankar@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).