From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
jouni.hogander@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/dp: Allow AS_SDP only if panel replay + auxless alpm is supported
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 17:42:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aQDkX6dk_Ek5OhpJ@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251028043502.2977803-3-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 10:05:01AM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
> Adaptive Sync SDP is required when Panel replay is active and for
> supporting VRR on PCON.
>
> Since VRR on PCON still needs some effort, enable adaptive sync SDP only
> when Panel replay with ALPM-Auxless is supported.
>
> Set the AS_SDP mode for Fixed Vtotal mode for fixed refresh rate case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index ee113e118fed..8583cab37123 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -2934,7 +2934,15 @@ static void intel_dp_compute_as_sdp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode =
> &crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode;
>
> - if (!crtc_state->vrr.enable || !intel_dp->as_sdp_supported)
> + if (!intel_dp->as_sdp_supported)
> + return;
> +
> + /*
> + * Support Adaptive-Sync SDP only for PR+AUX-less ALPM for now.
> + * It can be enabled for PCON + VRR, but that is currently not supported.
> + */
> + if (!CAN_PANEL_REPLAY(intel_dp) ||
> + !intel_alpm_aux_less_wake_supported(intel_dp))
> return;
You're not using any of the the psr/alpm crtc_state stuff in here,
so I'm not sure why you did the reordering in the previous patch?
>
> crtc_state->infoframes.enable |= intel_hdmi_infoframe_enable(DP_SDP_ADAPTIVE_SYNC);
> @@ -2948,9 +2956,12 @@ static void intel_dp_compute_as_sdp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> as_sdp->mode = DP_AS_SDP_FAVT_TRR_REACHED;
> as_sdp->target_rr = drm_mode_vrefresh(adjusted_mode);
> as_sdp->target_rr_divider = true;
> - } else {
> + } else if (crtc_state->vrr.enable) {
> as_sdp->mode = DP_AS_SDP_AVT_DYNAMIC_VTOTAL;
We do not seem to configure the other bit in DOWNSPREAD_CTRL
properly for AS SDP v2, so technically this value looks to be
illegal. Same for the CMRR case.
The AS SDP (and SDP in general) code seems to have a myriad
of problems. Here are the ones off the top of my head:
- lack of SDP header validation in intel_compare_*_sdp()
- nothing seems to check that AS SDP v2 is actually
supported and not just v1. I suppose maybe the PR+AUX-less
check might be enough for that?
- intel_dp_as_sdp_unpack() target_rr readout looks broken
- intel_dp_as_sdp_pack() hardcodes HB2 instead of getting it
from the input
- atomic updates/double buffering of all video DIPs is probably
completely broken
- already discussed the vblank evasion issues in the previous mail
I suppose we don't need to fix it right now, but just a heads up
that a significant amount of work os needed to get this code into
decent shape.
> as_sdp->target_rr = 0;
> + } else {
> + as_sdp->mode = DP_AS_SDP_AVT_FIXED_VTOTAL;
> + as_sdp->target_rr = 0;
These target_rr assignments look completely redundant.
> }
> }
>
> --
> 2.45.2
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-28 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-28 4:34 [PATCH 0/3] Fix Adaptive Sync SDP for Panel Replay Ankit Nautiyal
2025-10-28 4:35 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/dp: Move computation of as_sdp_after psr and lobf Ankit Nautiyal
2025-10-28 15:23 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-10-28 4:35 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/dp: Allow AS_SDP only if panel replay + auxless alpm is supported Ankit Nautiyal
2025-10-28 15:42 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2025-10-28 4:35 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/display: Take into account AS SDP in intel_dp_sdp_min_guardband Ankit Nautiyal
2025-10-28 5:50 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for Fix Adaptive Sync SDP for Panel Replay Patchwork
2025-10-28 14:08 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aQDkX6dk_Ek5OhpJ@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jouni.hogander@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).