From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: "Murthy, Arun R" <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@ursulin.net>,
xaver.hugl@kde.org, harry.wentland@amd.com,
uma.shankar@intel.com, louis.chauvet@bootlin.com,
naveen1.kumar@intel.com, ramya.krishna.yella@intel.com,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/7] User readable error codes on atomic_ioctl failure
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2026 11:03:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aZ1pehb3Q737gUeB@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a6f1c6e3-c226-4aae-b8fc-64c3bac2f251@intel.com>
On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 02:24:42PM +0530, Murthy, Arun R wrote:
> On 24-02-2026 14:16, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 12:46:10PM +0530, Murthy, Arun R wrote:
> >> On 24-02-2026 12:37, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 03:37:39PM +0530, Murthy, Arun R wrote:
> >>>> Any other comments/feedback on this?
> >>> Having random strings as uabi seems like a bad idea.
> >>> How would you make sure those are never changed?
> >> The requirement was to have a string for logging/debugging in the UMD
> >> logs and KMD/display to pass the verbose information.
> >>
> >> Discussions around this.[1][2]
> >>
> >> [1] https://hackmd.io/f3bDn3kyRUalLn4LbMfCVQ#Commit-Failure-Feedback
> >>
> >> [2] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/666193/?series=152276&rev=1
> > So the enum+obj_id thing there is perhaps the only thing that makes
> > sense for compositors.
> >
> > Although I kinda doubt its actual usefulness to drive useful
> > fallback logic because often the restrictions might be a combination
> > of many things, and the kernel can only realistically report one of
> > those things.
> >
> > Anyways, someone really needs to do the actual compositor
> > implementation so that we could see how any of this would
> > even work in practice.
> Xaver is working on the compositor implementation for KWin and has
> commented[3] that the API looks good.
>
>
> [3] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/696982/?series=152275&rev=6
Until we see it I don't think there's any point in constantly
spamming this series.
> Thanks and Regards,
> Arun R Murthy
> -------------------
>
> >> Thanks and Regards,
> >> Arun R Murthy
> >> -------------------
> >>
> >>>> Thanks and Regards,
> >>>> Arun R Murthy
> >>>> -------------------
> >>>>
> >>>> On 23-02-2026 14:45, Arun R Murthy wrote:
> >>>>> EDITME: Imported from f20260210-atomic-v9-5-525c88fd2402@intel.com
> >>>>> Please review before sending.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The series focuses on providing a user readable error value on a failure
> >>>>> in drm_atomic_ioctl(). Usually -EINVAL is returned in most of the error
> >>>>> cases and it is difficult for the user to decode the error and get to
> >>>>> know the real cause for the error. If user gets to know the reason for
> >>>>> the error then corrective measurements can be taken up.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> User will have to check for the capability
> >>>>> DRM_CAP_ATOMIC_ERROR_REPORTING before using this feature so as to ensure
> >>>>> that the driver supports failure reporting.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> TODO: driver specific error codes are to be added and will be done in
> >>>>> the follow-up patches.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> TODO: Once the series is merged the element 'reserved' used for sending
> >>>>> the failure code in struct drm_mode_atomic is to changed to err_code.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The IGT related changes are pushed for review @
> >>>>> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/153330/
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [RFC] changes for libdrm pushed for review @
> >>>>> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/libdrm/-/merge_requests/450
> >>>>>
> >>>>> To: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> >>>>> To: suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
> >>>>> To: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
> >>>>> To: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
> >>>>> To: David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
> >>>>> To: Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>
> >>>>> To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
> >>>>> To: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> >>>>> To: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> >>>>> To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@ursulin.net>
> >>>>> To: xaver.hugl@kde.org
> >>>>> To: harry.wentland@amd.com
> >>>>> To: uma.shankar@intel.com
> >>>>> To: louis.chauvet@bootlin.com
> >>>>> To: naveen1.kumar@intel.com
> >>>>> To: ramya.krishna.yella@intel.com
> >>>>> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> >>>>> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> >>>>> Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>> Changes in v9:
> >>>>> - EDITME: describe what is new in this series revision.
> >>>>> - EDITME: use bulletpoints and terse descriptions.
> >>>>> - Link to v8: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260129-atomic-v8-0-4cb7b0faa051@intel.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>> Arun R Murthy (7):
> >>>>> drm: Define user readable error codes for atomic ioctl
> >>>>> drm/atomic: Add error_code element in atomic_state
> >>>>> drm/atomic: Call complete_signaling only if prepare_signaling is done
> >>>>> drm/atomic: Allocate atomic_state at the beginning of atomic_ioctl
> >>>>> drm/atomic: Return user readable error in atomic_ioctl
> >>>>> drm/i915/display: Error codes for async flip failures
> >>>>> drm: Introduce DRM_CAP_ATOMIC_ERROR_REPORTING
> >>>>>
> >>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c | 31 ++++++++++
> >>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
> >>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c | 3 +
> >>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 25 ++++----
> >>>>> include/drm/drm_atomic.h | 10 ++++
> >>>>> include/uapi/drm/drm.h | 7 +++
> >>>>> include/uapi/drm/drm_mode.h | 37 ++++++++++++
> >>>>> 7 files changed, 165 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>> base-commit: cec43d5c2696af219fc2ef71dd7e93db48c80f66
> >>>>> change-id: 20250728-atomic-c9713fd357e4
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Best regards,
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-24 9:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-23 9:15 [PATCH v10 0/7] User readable error codes on atomic_ioctl failure Arun R Murthy
2026-02-23 9:15 ` [PATCH v10 1/7] drm: Define user readable error codes for atomic ioctl Arun R Murthy
2026-02-23 9:16 ` [PATCH v10 2/7] drm/atomic: Add error_code element in atomic_state Arun R Murthy
2026-02-23 9:16 ` [PATCH v10 3/7] drm/atomic: Call complete_signaling only if prepare_signaling is done Arun R Murthy
2026-02-23 9:16 ` [PATCH v10 4/7] drm/atomic: Allocate atomic_state at the beginning of atomic_ioctl Arun R Murthy
2026-02-23 9:16 ` [PATCH v10 5/7] drm/atomic: Return user readable error in atomic_ioctl Arun R Murthy
2026-02-23 9:16 ` [PATCH v10 6/7] drm/i915/display: Error codes for async flip failures Arun R Murthy
2026-02-23 9:16 ` [PATCH v10 7/7] drm: Introduce DRM_CAP_ATOMIC_ERROR_REPORTING Arun R Murthy
2026-02-23 10:07 ` [PATCH v10 0/7] User readable error codes on atomic_ioctl failure Murthy, Arun R
2026-02-24 7:07 ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-02-24 7:16 ` Murthy, Arun R
2026-02-24 8:46 ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-02-24 8:54 ` Murthy, Arun R
2026-02-24 9:03 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2026-02-24 9:28 ` Jani Nikula
2026-02-24 9:31 ` Murthy, Arun R
2026-02-24 12:07 ` Jani Nikula
2026-03-18 15:26 ` Xaver Hugl
2026-02-23 11:09 ` ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure for User readable error codes on atomic_ioctl failure (rev9) Patchwork
2026-03-18 15:05 ` [PATCH v10 0/7] User readable error codes on atomic_ioctl failure Xaver Hugl
2026-03-23 6:07 ` Murthy, Arun R
2026-03-23 21:19 ` Xaver Hugl
2026-03-24 4:46 ` Murthy, Arun R
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aZ1pehb3Q737gUeB@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=arun.r.murthy@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=harry.wentland@amd.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=louis.chauvet@bootlin.com \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=naveen1.kumar@intel.com \
--cc=ramya.krishna.yella@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
--cc=tursulin@ursulin.net \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
--cc=uma.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=xaver.hugl@kde.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox